Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternative views/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

There is a Request for Comment at the Talk page for transhumanist politics. The Transhumanist Party recently finished an American bus tour – should it be mentioned in the "History" section of the article? –Haptic-feedback (talk) 07:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi folks! They could sure use a few eyes over at Water fluoridation. Please have a quick look at the history and please drop by Talk:Water fluoridation#April 28, 2016 to share your thoughts. Many, many thanks. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Would talk:holocaust revisionism fall in this project's scope? Trying to father input on what to name or how to present an article conservatively designed to highlight basic reliably publicized changes in statistical estimates of death counts or camp sites. Basically to cover legitimate revisionism rather than the illegitimate kind which often needs to negationism or denialism.

People seem to think a source need s to use the exact phrase to be counted in a field and can't acknowledge a changed number estimate is a revisionist. --Ranze (talk) 08:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

The alternative view of those who claim to be targeted individuals (TIs) is being described as a delusion at the electronic harassment article. I have tried to change that but failed, despite a Washington Post article Mind Games that is acceptable as a reliable source. Any assistance would be welcome. (for some reason I cannot give you a link to the Wikipedia "Electronic Harassment" article) Jed Stuart (talk) 04:22, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Icannotthinkofagoodusername (talk · contribs) is adding the project template to people from Jerry Fallwell to Mussolini, and to White Supremacy. Perhaps someone from the project could check the additions and advise him? Thanks. Doug Weller talk 18:08, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

And an IP, 92.28.226.240 (talk · contribs) - to the KKK article, Margaret Thatcher, atheism, Hitler, etc. Doug Weller talk 18:10, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

The account has been blocked, and the account's edits and IP's edits reverted. Johnuniq (talk) 00:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

RfC here SPECIFICO talk 15:29, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

    Eaterjolly (talk) 09:54, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

This argument of mine is irrelevant, because it was based on the false premise of scope. This project's scope is limited to fields of endeavor, not strictly any "views".Eaterjolly (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

There is a deletion debate here at

Greetings WikiProject Alternative views/Archive 4 Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

• Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards,

I propose clarifying:

• Theology is a field, religion is not.
• Political Science is a field, politics is not.
• Philosophy is a field, spirituality is not.

etc..

Also seems like a lot of these articles are about minority religions, political stances, people with lots of different unrelated views, etc.

I think it would be best to start removing articles which aren't either about a view itself or a major developer of a view. Individuals, organizations, and media designed to promote these ideas should not be included. 12.168.201.132 (talk) 07:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

I've reverted you at the NWO conspiracy theory talk page, that's still poly sci.Doug Weller talk 07:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

I've reverted you at some articles. The way you are defining "field" is odd in some of these cases; for example, this one. It is easy to argue that a

talk

) 20:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

There is currently an RfC about the outcome of the presidential election here. Participation would be appreciated. This project is being contact because it is listed as one of the projects on the Donald Trump talk page. Thanks. SW3 5DL (talk) 17:03, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Donald J. Trump. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot

21:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Soylent (food)

listed at Requested moves

here. —RMCD bot

06:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories listed at Requested moves

John F. Kennedy assassination fringe theories. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot

03:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Soylent (food)

listed at Requested moves

here. —RMCD bot

17:02, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Blue quartz

The redirect Blue quartz, which currently points to Quartz, has been nominate at RfD. As google hits suggest there is significant interest in blue quartz in the "new age", alternative medicine and other similar fields, your input to the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 7#Blue quartz is invited. Thryduulf (talk) 14:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Soylent (food)

listed at Requested moves

here. —RMCD bot

19:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Mind control

listed at Requested moves

Mind control to be moved to Brainwashing. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot

23:00, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Zionist Occupation Government conspiracy theory listed at Requested moves

Zionist Occupation Government. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot

01:47, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Popular pages report

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative views/Archive 4/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

• The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
• The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
• The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Alternative views, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:15, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Nephite

listed at Requested moves

here. —RMCD bot

10:30, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Ancient astronauts listed at Requested moves

Ancient aliens. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot

14:15, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

WikiProject Chiropractic

Just started a new wikiproject. Since this project touches shares a small amount of pages with it, some people on this project might be interested in joining, soI figured I'd post here.

WP:CHIROPRACTIC. SEMMENDINGER (talk

) 13:02, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Two-Spirit

listed at Requested moves

here. —RMCD bot

09:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Liberal eugenics

listed at Requested moves

here. —RMCD bot

15:14, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Finland does not exist listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Finland does not exist to be moved to Finland does not exist (meme). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:17, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Alex Jones (radio host)

listed at Requested moves

here. —RMCD bot

10:59, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming to be moved to List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 16:30, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

United States pro-life movement

listed at Requested moves

here. —RMCD bot

19:45, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Scope question: morality and ethics

Does "moral philosophy" count as a "field" and, by extension, would "alternative morals" fall under the scope of "alternative views"?

2600:1702:1740:2CA0:BD29:37B9:F5AE:274E (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Yes, to the extent that it is notable. The project has a broad scope, ranging from the sciences to the humanities, including moral philosophy. Tim Smith (talk) 04:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Move Alternative Views to Alternative views

Hmmm. I noticed that the name of this project is Alternative views, but the project banner read Alternative Views, leading to a redirect to the project. I thought I'd move the project banner name to match the project name. After I did that I realised that a number of pages and categories linked to the project were also named Alternative Views. I started to change these, then realised what a task I had set myself, and it's now nearly 3 in the morning in the UK, and I wished I'd not started this! At this point I don't know if it's best to roll back everything I've done, or to continue. But whichever way it's going to be, I think it needs some discussion and consensus, and that I should stop messing about. I'll check back here later on today to see what people think should be done. SilkTork (talk) 01:47, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

I've restored everything. If there's anything I missed, please let me know, and I'll rectify it. SilkTork (talk) 09:06, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Archives

I have organised the archives so they are now in date order and in three pages linked from the talkheader box at the top of the page. There are now just three archive pages instead of 21, and I have archived the discussions on this page up to the start of this year. I have removed the old archive box as it just duplicates the archive list in the talkheader box. SilkTork (talk) 09:51, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, SilkTork! Tim Smith (talk) 04:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

RfC on List of cryptids

I am letting you know of an rfc to merge List of cryptids. Which ever way the wind blows you are welcome to join in. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice; I've added my opinion and encourage others to do the same. List of cryptids is our 33rd most viewed article (out of over 1,300 in WikiProject Alternative views). Tim Smith (talk) 01:31, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Discussion

A discussion of interest to the members of this project can be found at Talk:Conspiracy theory#"Without credible evidence". Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Conspiracy theory lead RfC

Editor input is requested at Talk:Conspiracy theory#Lead (RfC). Thank you. Leviv ich 20:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposal to

blacklist Natural News

There is a proposal to add

WP:RSN § Natural News. — Newslinger talk

22:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

"Great Replacement" move discussion

Interested users may wish to join a requested move discussion at

Talk:The Great Replacement that concerns this project. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk

) 09:05, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposal to merge WikiProject Alternative views into WikiProject Skepticism

There is a proposal to

merge WikiProject Alternative views into WikiProject Skepticism. If you are interested, please participate at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skepticism § Proposal to merge WikiProject Alternative views into WikiProject Skepticism. — Newslinger talk

01:11, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:23, 27 October 2019 (UTC)