Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles
WT:GAN .
|
WikiProject Good articles was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 18 September 2013. |
WikiProject Good articles was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 24 September 2014. |
|
|||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
improving my article
Hello everybody, this Walt . I am trying to improve my article, I expect some basic tips and recommendation.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Masterwork_Cymbals#draft_of_Masterwork_cymbals
Featured quality source review RFC
Editors in this WikiProject may be interested in the
A new newsletter directory is out!
A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
- – Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
WugBot update
Hi all, I've started testing a new version of WugBot that should improve the way the
On another note there is a discussion at GAN about splitting the biology and medicine category. An apparent problem is that Legobot probably can't handle that change and updates seem unlikely. If there's consensus for splitting that category I'd be willing to take over that task from Legoktm and make the needed changes. Comments on this are welcome. Wugapodes [thɑk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 03:25, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
- I've updated the bot. The report should be updated in a few hours by the new version, let me know if you see any problems. Wugapodes [thɑk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɹɪbz] 19:11, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Should we mark this project as inactive/defunct?
Hi all. It looks like there's not much traffic at this project page anymore, and instead conversations related to the GA process broadly are happening at
- Done This seems uncontroversial. I've left a note redirecting folks to ]