Wikipedia talk:WikiProject India/Rajeshbieee

I was just thinking - we should use the check mark to show that an article would pass GNG and an X to show that they wouldn't, just for ease of detecting which ones of these failed guidelines, especially if we have to go back and nominate any for deletion.

Updated instructions, look okay? -- samtar ^whisper 10:24, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Looks great! I figure that this can be helpful if anyone wants to just speed through some and not go through the process of nominating just yet.
  (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:25, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Another question: should we use
  (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Looks good to me :) -- samtar ^whisper 10:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

They were listed for merging by someone since March, so that I thought we should not delete them (at least those which are referenced) now in any case, just let the merge discussion run its way.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should we use a different icon for the redirects? It's not quite a deletion but it's not really a keep either. Right now the sock is arguing that he's a separate account and that his article creation should count for him. Offhand my thought is "no way" but if by some chance he can prove that he isn't a sock, then the amount of deleted and redirected articles could be used to establish a case for him not to get unblocked. You guys' thoughts on this?

It would not harm in any case.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rajeshbieee is lobbying for an unblocking, so if anyone wants to weigh in they can do so on his talk page. Two editors I trust have vouched that he's not a sockpuppet or in other ways, so I've posted some requirements about his unblock if he's unblocked. Namely that he'd have to fix these articles before posting more and that above all else, he'd have to go through AfC and mentorship for at least a year or two before he can be trusted to create articles. I'm kind of leery about this since I don't really know how well he'd do if unblocked but this is a

• Chahoonga Main Tujhe (AfD'd)
• Ponnu Pudichirukku‎
• Jawaani
• Oray Thaai Oray Kulam
• Zid (1976 film)
• Aakhri Muqabla

Three of mines were also deprodded. I sent all of them to AfD; one had sources added, and I withdrew it, two are still at AfD.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm kind of frustrated that people are dePRODing them without providing sources, given the situation. While sure, there may be other sources found by others at AfD, this is a pretty unusual circumstance given the amount of articles we have to wade through.
  (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:28, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  I agree, but I do not think we can do anything about it.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:48, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]