If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features.

The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts".

This is an automated message sent out by Addbot to all wikiprojects per request ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 20:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have just signed up as a member of the taskforce. I'm completely new to this but live in a world of Victorian Novels so am keen to get involved. Please accept my apologies if I'm not meant to post this kind of message here - it's going to take a while to learn to navigate my way around here! I hope that I can contribute any useful knowledge I may possess on this subject and look forward to kind people helping to steer me in the right direction! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scheherazade73 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am a new member as of 19 October 2012. I am very interested in 19th century literature, and I have been perusing some of the larger novel articles. I'd love to assist in any way I can, and I'm very excited for this project. - Leahrodrig (talk) 16:07, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have a couple incomplete sets of Sir Walter Scott's novels, both with engraved frontispieces. An example is at

Short answer yes - not necessarily as a replacement for first edition covers or material though. Also I would size them slightly smaller and I would concentrate on inproving each artciel as you go through. So work up the text part of

Bride of Lammermoor first. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 08:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I only replace title pages if they're really bad quality, and/or not actually first edition. Unfortunately, we have a lot of both. As for size: I tend to make them just big enough that the infobox text doesn't wrap - it seems to look tidier to me. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 11:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I also have a lot of The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman images, though that's a little early for this task force. A couple of them are up for Featured picture, not that anyone's voting on them, mind. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 11:37, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to WikiProjects with

If any members are interested, please visit the GA sweeps page for further details and instructions in initiating a review. If you'd like to join the process, please add your name to the running total page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles from the worklist or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. With ~1,300 articles left to review, we would appreciate any editors that could contribute in helping to uphold the quality of GAs. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 21:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have conducted a reassessment of the article as part of the

I'm here after reading the plot summary of The Way We Live Now. It's apparently based more on a television adaptation than on the novel: virtually every paragraph contains some detail that's not true of the book. The situation seems to call for a complete rewriting of the summary; but I'm loath to undertake such a major edit without registering and participating in discussion.

I'm currently re-reading the book and making notes for a revised summary. If I can do that without crashing the system too badly, I would be willing to expand some of the stub articles on Trollope novels, at least to the tune of adding plot summaries.

Ammodramus (talk) 20:00, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have finally screwed up my courage to hit the "Save page" button on The American Senator. This is the first time I've tried writing a WP article, and I'm not sure what to do next. I've looked for articles that should link to it, and think I've found everything; but I haven't created redirect pages, disambiguation pages, &c. Advice would be appreciated.

--Ammodramus (talk) 15:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Better late than never, but very good article. You are certainly on the right track! Keep it up! ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 06:01, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the article on Jules Verne's novel Five Weeks in a Balloon could be improved, see in particular my comment at Talk:Five_Weeks_in_a_Balloon#Inconsistent_scientific/technological_reference. Could somebody please take a look?--Gautier lebon (talk) 09:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, nearly all wikiproject topics will be effected.

The two opposing positions which have the most support is:

1. supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
2. opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect

Comments are welcome. Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment.

Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced article if they are not sourced, so your project may want to pursue the projects below.

List of cleanup articles for your project

If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see: Cleanup listings A list of examples is here

Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages"

If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation page", contact me,

Watchlisting all unreferenced articles

If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me,

Ikip 02:13, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this task force still active. If not, I would be interested in helping to re-activate, galvanise an effort regarding 19th century literature/novels. Currently, I am working on upgrading the article on She to GA status, and then hope to do the same for some of Ann Radcliffe's works (esp The Romance of the Forest) - I know Radcliffe isn't strictly speaking 19th century, but close enough! :)

Anyone interested in giving this (dead?) body a poke? ✽ Juniper§ Liege ^(TALK) 05:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at >>>Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/19th century task force/Unreferenced BLPs<<<

If you do not want this wikiproject to participate, please add your project name to this list.

Thank you. Okip 02:49, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I think that the characters of these novels (especially A Tale of Two Cities) need more comprehensive articles on them. Can some of us take a look at these? Chandra K-R (talk) 02:45, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recently I have been auto-tagging articles about novels which have been assessed as stubs by WPNovels, some of the assessments of these pages are out of date, please help sort the articles and screen for out of date assessments at Category:Novel stubs, Thank you, Sadads (talk) 15:50, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Started a discussion for improving the above page on its talk if anyone's interested. jamdav86 (talk) 11:46, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]