Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rocketry/Titles/Round 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was implement --GW_Simulations

Talk 09:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Details

This is a follow-up to the

Talk 21:24, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Page moves

Splits

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d e f g The "(rocket family)" disambiguator was added too late in the original proposal to include this move
  2. ^ a b To keep in line with other rockets in the same family
  3. ^ Accidentally omitted from original proposal
  4. ^ Technically not a missile
  5. ^ a b Article was created after proposal had been made

Discussion

  • Please discuss the proposal here. --GW_Simulations
    Talk 21:24, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Comments after closure

What was the reason for the SS-N-23 → R-29RM Shtil and R-29RMU Sineva split? Both are very small articles and both missiles seem to have the same NATO designation.

Offliner (talk) 16:11, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Note