Acacitli

On the other hand, the Journal provides a clearer and more coherent list based on older sources calculating in the Indigenous way, from which the inconsistencies of the periods of the other lists are observed and studied. In the same manner as the previous list, he was converted

might certainly seem the same, but it is not. This list advocates placing 12-house in 1205 and 13-cane in 1219, that is, 52 years later.'

The Annals of Tlatelolco present a different list that does not clear up the problem in its entirety, taking into account that

cuauhtlahtohqueh. Starting from the year 8-casa 1253 and going back to the year 1-acatl 1155, he was placed as successor of Cuauhtlequetzqui in 1205 (12-casa) established in Tlemaco to Apanteuctli, who replaced Acacitli until his death in 1236 (4-tecpatl) in Apazco

.

It is also useful to mention that it is preferable to bring the

cuauhtlahtohqueh in the historically true since 1240; First, the sources themselves indicate events that are excessively mythologized, incoherent, contradictory and not very corroborable in reality. ^[9]

See also

• List of Tenochtitlan rulers

Notes

1. ^ ^{a b} Berdan & Anawalt (1997): p. 5.
2. ^ Chimalpahin (1997): pp. 36–37.
3. BnF
   ) that succeeds the Second Relation and precedes the Third Relation is "Brief Memorial on the Foundation of the City of Culhuacan" (in the original fol. 15r: Memorial breue sobre la fundaçiô de la ciudad de Culhuacan), so it is an abbreviation.
4. America and Europe, this also causes the Mexica chronology to extend into the past towards even more remote times and most of the inconsistencies arise.(Hernández Maciel 2019
   ).
5. ^ There are other versions (one by Chimalpahin) that do not expose Acacitli, so they will not be mentioned.
6. Toltec
   , the binomial of nine (9). It was eventually standardized to nine
   cuauhtlahtohqueh
   from the third to the fifth, which, according to the Memorial of Colhuacan complemented on this occasion by the Diary give us to understand that they are "filler": Citlallitzin: 'venerable star' (1219–1234), Tzimpantzin: 'venerable standard-bearer' (1234–1235) and Tlazohtzin: 'venerable appreciated' (1235–1239). (Hernández Maciel 2019, p. 1).
7. ^ Calendric-symbolic binomial that represents the end/beginning of an event or events, so other sources point to the foundation in this year.
8. ^ That instead, the Third relation (from the same Chimalpahin) clarifies this "gap" by placing Iztacmixcoatl, who would be the "initiator" of the first Mexica royal lineage.
9. ^ Well, that's how the sources interpret it.

References

• Berdan, Frances F; Patricia Rieff Anawalt (1997). The Essential Codex Mendoza. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 5.
  ISBN 0-520-20454-9
  .
• ISBN 0-8061-2921-2
  .
• García Granados, Rafael (1952). "3 Acacitli". Diccionario Biográfico de Historia Antigua de Méjico. Méjico: Instituto de Historia. pp. vol. 1, p. 2.
• Hernández Maciel, Francisco Jesús (2019). ¿Se equivocó Chimalpahin? La manera indígena de contar el tiempo [Was Chimalpahin wrong? The indigenous way of counting time] (in Spanish). Guadalajara, México: Estudios cronológicos.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Acacitli.