Category talk:Classical genetics

Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This category is supported by the Genetics task force.

History of Science Category‑class

This category is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the category attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles Category This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

What is the purpose of this category? Epistasis was recently moved from Category:Genetics to here, and I'm not sure I entirely agree with it. Epistasis belongs wherever pleiotropy, canalisation, and plasticity go - all current research topics in genetics. Classical genetics sounds a bit like "old and established" genetics, even leaning towards obsolete. Is someone actually going through the entries in Category:Genetics and deciding where they should go? - Samsara 13:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]