Category talk:Wikipedia multilingual support templates

	Templates
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Templates, a group dedicated to improving the maintenance of Wikipedia's templates. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TemplatesWikipedia:WikiProject TemplatesTemplate:WikiProject TemplatesTemplates articles

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Category‑class

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles Category This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. This category is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Shouldn't Template:lang-nds direct to Low German since that's the name of the article? —  AjaxSmack  23:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

please, please stop creating these {{

}} directly. What you are doing is creating a crapload of templates that do nothing else but transclude another template. Which is a bad idea already for concerns of server load. I would even recommend scrapping that too, and spell out the langauge link in the text, as in

[[French language|French]]: ''{{lang|fr|langue}}''.

All "multilingual support templates" we should need are {{

]

From what I remember, template transclusion hasn't been an issue as far as the server load is concerned for quite a while now. As long as transcluded templates are not frequently edited (and {{lang-xx}} templates are certainly not edited often), the server load effects of requesting a transcluded template vs. a regular template are pretty much the same. And since the server load isn't an issue, then there is really no compelling reason to sacrifice convenience these templates offer.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What Ëzhiki said above, in 2007, is even more true today over 7 years later.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  07:26, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why do some lang templates render the content in italics (e.g. {{lang-hr}}, {{lang-nl}}), while others do not (e.g. {{lang-bg}}, {{lang-el}})? I think that no italics would be preferable, but above all these templates should be consistent. GregorB 21:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I get it now: Latin script - italics; not a Latin-based script - no italics. That's MoS. GregorB (talk) 18:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]