Cavity ring-down spectroscopy

Cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) is a highly sensitive

level. The technique is also known as cavity ring-down laser absorption spectroscopy (CRLAS).

A typical CRDS setup consists of a

. The laser is then turned off in order to allow the measurement of the exponentially decaying light intensity leaking from the cavity. During this decay, light is reflected back and forth thousands of times between the mirrors giving an effective path length for the extinction on the order of a few kilometers.

If a light-absorbing material is now placed in the cavity, the

decreases as fewer bounces through the medium are required before the light is fully absorbed, or absorbed to some fraction of its initial intensity. A CRDS setup measures how long it takes for the light to decay to 1/e of its initial intensity, and this "ringdown time" can be used to calculate the concentration of the absorbing substance in the gas mixture in the cavity.

Detailed description

Cavity ring-down spectroscopy is a form of

of time.

${\displaystyle I(t)=I_{0}\exp \left(-t/\tau \right)}$

The principle of operation is based on the measurement of a decay rate rather than an absolute absorbance. This is one reason for the increased sensitivity over traditional absorption spectroscopy, as the technique is then immune to shot-to-shot laser fluctuations. The decay constant, τ, which is the time taken for the intensity of light to fall to 1/e of the initial intensity, is called the ring-down time and is dependent on the loss mechanism(s) within the cavity. For an empty cavity, the decay constant is dependent on mirror loss and various optical phenomena like scattering and refraction:

${\displaystyle \tau _{0}={\frac {n}{c}}\cdot {\frac {l}{1-R+X}}}$

where n is the

. Assuming the sample fills the entire cavity,

${\displaystyle \tau ={\frac {n}{c}}\cdot {\frac {l}{1-R+X+\alpha l}}}$

where α is the absorption coefficient for a specific analyte concentration at the cavity's resonance wavelength. The decadic absorbance, A, due to the analyte can be determined from both ring-down times.

${\displaystyle A={\frac {n}{c}}\cdot {\frac {l}{2.303}}\cdot \left({\frac {1}{\tau }}-{\frac {1}{\tau _{0}}}\right)}$

Alternatively, the

, ε, and analyte concentration, C, can be determined from the ratio of both ring-down times. If X can be neglected, one obtains

${\displaystyle {\frac {\tau _{0}}{\tau }}=1+{\frac {\alpha l}{1-R}}=1+{\frac {2.303\epsilon lC}{(1-R)}}}$

When a ratio of species' concentrations is the analytical objective, as for example in carbon-13 to carbon-12 measurements in carbon dioxide, the ratio of ring-down times measured for the same sample at the relevant absorption frequencies can be used directly with extreme accuracy and precision.

Advantages of CRDS

There are two main advantages to CRDS over other absorption methods:

First, it is not affected by fluctuations in the laser intensity. In most absorption measurements, the light source must be assumed to remain steady between blank (no analyte), standard (known amount of analyte), and sample (unknown amount of analyte). Any drift (change in the light source) between measurements will introduce errors. In CRDS, the ringdown time does not depend on the intensity of the laser, so fluctuations of this type are not a problem. Independency from laser intensity makes CRDS needless to any calibration and comparison with standards.^[1]

Second, it is very sensitive due to its long pathlength. In absorption measurements, the smallest amount that can be detected is proportional to the length that the light travels through a sample. Since the light reflects many times between the mirrors, it ends up traveling long distances. For example, a laser pulse making 500 round trips through a 1-meter cavity will effectively have traveled through 1 kilometer of sample.

Thus, the advantages include:

• High sensitivity due to the multipass nature (i.e. long pathlength) of the detection cell.
• Immunity to shot variations in laser intensity due to the measurement of a rate constant.
• Wide range of use for a given set of mirrors; typically, ±5% of the center wavelength.
• High throughput, individual ring down events occur on the millisecond time scale.
• No need for a fluorophore, which makes it more attractive than laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) or resonance-enhanced multiphoton ionization (REMPI) for some (e.g. rapidly predissociating) systems.
• Commercial systems available.

Disadvantages of CRDS

• Spectra cannot be acquired quickly due to the
  LED or supercontinuum sources^[2][3][4] for CRDS, the light of which can then be dispersed by a grating onto a CCD, or Fourier transformed spectrometer (mainly in broadband analogues of CRDS). Perhaps more importantly, the development of CRDS based techniques have now been demonstrated over the range from the near UV to the mid-infrared.^[5] In addition, the frequency-agile rapid scanning (FARS) CRDS technique has been developed to overcome the mechanical or thermal frequency tuning which typically limits CRDS acquisition rates. The FARS method utilizes an electro-optic modulator to step a probe laser side band to successive cavity modes, eliminating tuning time between data points and allowing for acquisition rates about 2 orders of magnitude faster than traditional thermal tuning.^[6]
• Analytes are limited both by the availability of tunable laser light at the appropriate wavelength and also the availability of high reflectance mirrors at those wavelengths.
• Expense: the requirement for laser systems and high reflectivity mirrors often makes CRDS orders of magnitude more expensive than some alternative spectroscopic techniques.

See also

• Absorption spectroscopy
• Laser absorption spectrometry
• Noise-Immune Cavity-Enhanced Optical-Heterodyne Molecular Spectroscopy (NICE-OHMS)
• Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy (TDLAS)

References

• Anthony O'Keefe; David A.G. Deacon (1988). "Cavity ring-down Optical Spectrometer for absorption measurements using pulsed laser sources". Review of Scientific Instruments. 59 (12): 2544.
  S2CID 6033311
  .
• Piotr Zalicki; Richard N. Zare (15 February 1995). "Cavity ring-down spectroscopy for quantitative absorption measurements". The Journal of Chemical Physics. 102 (7): 2708–2717.
  doi:10.1063/1.468647
  .
• Giel Berden; Rudy Peeters; Gerard Meijer (2000). "Cavity ring-down spectroscopy: Experimental schemes and applications". International Reviews in Physical Chemistry. 19 (4): 565–607.
  S2CID 98510055
  .