Chemoton

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
theoretical biologist Tibor Gánti. Gánti conceived the basic idea in 1952 and formulated the concept in 1971 in his book The Principles of Life (originally written in Hungarian, and translated to English only in 2003).[1][2]
He suggested that the chemoton was the original ancestor of all organisms.

The basic assumption of the model is that life should fundamentally and essentially have three properties:

origin of life as it provides a philosophy of evolutionary units.[4]

Property

The chemoton is a protocell that grows by metabolism, reproduces by biological

membrane lipids, but it is highly dynamic, leaving small gaps that close and open frequently. This unstable structure is important for new amphipathic molecules to be added, so that a membrane is subsequently formed. This will become a microsphere. Due to metabolic reaction, osmotic pressure will build up inside the microsphere, and this will generate a force for invaginating the membrane, and ultimately division. In fact, this is close to the cell division of cell wall-less bacteria, such as Mycoplasma. Continuous reactions will also invariably produce variable polymers that can be inherited by daughter cells. In the advanced version of the chemoton, the hereditary information will act as a genetic material, something like a ribozyme of the RNA world.[5]

Significance

Origin of life

The primary use of the chemoton model is in the study of the chemical origin of life. This is because the chemoton itself can be thought of as a primitive or minimal cellular life as it satisfies the definition of what a cell is (that it is a unit of biological activity enclosed by a membrane and capable of self-reproduction). Experimental demonstration showed that a synthesised chemoton can survive in a wide range of chemical solutions, it formed materials for its internal components, it metabolised its chemicals, and it grew in size and multiplied itself.[6]

Unit of selection

As it is scientifically hypothesised that the first replicating systems must be simple structure, most likely before any enzymes or templates existed, chemoton provides a plausible scenario. As an autocatalytic but non-genetic entity, it predates the enzyme-dependent precursors of life, such as RNA World. But being capable of self-replication and producing variant metabolites, it possibly could be an entity with the first biological evolution, therefore, the origin of the unit of Darwinian selection.[7][8][9]

Artificial life

The chemoton has laid the foundation of some aspects of artificial life. The computational basis has become a topic of software development and experimentation in the investigation of artificial life.[10] The main reason is that the chemoton simplifies the otherwise complex biochemical and molecular functions of living cells. Since the chemoton is a system consisting of a large but fixed number of interacting molecular species, it can effectively be implemented in a process algebra-based computer language.[11]

Comparison with other theories of life

The chemoton is just one of several theories of life, including the hypercycle of Manfred Eigen and Peter Schuster,[12] [13] [14] which includes the concept of

(M,R) systems[15]
Robert Rosen, autopoiesis (or self-building)[17] of Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela, and the autocatalytic sets[18] of Stuart Kauffman, similar to an earlier proposal by Freeman Dyson.[19]
All of these (including the chemoton) found their original inspiration in
What is Life?[20] but at first they appear to have little in common with one another, largely because the authors did not communicate with one another, and none of them made any reference in their principal publications to any of the other theories. (Gánti's book[1] does include a mention of Rosen, but this was added as an editorial comment, and was not written by Gánti.) Nonetheless, there are more similarities than may be obvious at first sight, for example between Gánti and Rosen.[21] Until recently[22][23][24]
there have been almost no attempts to compare the different theories and discuss them together.

Last Universal Common Ancestor (LUCA)

Some authors equate models of the origin of life with LUCA, the Last Universal Common Ancestor of all extant life.[25] This is a serious error resulting from failure to recognize that L refers to the last common ancestor, not to the first ancestor, which is much older: a large amount of evolution occurred before the appearance of LUCA.[26]

Gill and Forterre expressed the essential point as follows:[27]

LUCA should not be confused with the first cell, but was the product of a long period of evolution. Being the "last" means that LUCA was preceded by a long succession of older "ancestors."

References

  1. ^
    ISBN 9780198507260
    .
  2. ISBN 9780306477850
    .
  3. S2CID 10634307
    .
  4. PMID 17624859
    .
  5. ISBN 9780198502944
    .
  6. doi:10.1108/eb005677
    .
  7. ISBN 9780691007045
    .
  8. PMID 16330052
    .
  9. S2CID 6988070
    .
  10. ISBN 9781139494595
    .
  11. PMID 21818258
    .
  12. S2CID 42131267
    .
  13. S2CID 1812273
    .
  14. S2CID 1812273
    .
  15. doi:10.1007/BF02477890
    .
  16. ^ Rosen, R. (1991). Life Itself: a comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life. New York: Columbia University Press.
  17. ^ Maturana, H. R.; Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: the realisation of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
  18. PMID 5803332
    .
  19. S2CID 30423925
    .
  20. ^ Schrödinger, Erwin (1944). What is Life?. Cambridge University Press.
  21. PMID 25988381
    .
  22. PMID 21763318
    .
  23. PMID 24690545
    .
  24. S2CID 207946798
    .
  25. PMID 34575021
    .
  26. PMID 28536033
    .
  27. S2CID 44428292
    .

External links
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chemoton&oldid=1218972461"