Draft:Stroma (philosophy)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The stroma (estroma), is for philosophical materialism the name of each part of the perceptible world, Mi (mundus adspectabilis)

These parts could be named as

objects, entities, substances, etc., but the name of stroma is more precise according to Gustavo Bueno's description.[1][2]

The name is a neologism collected from the Stromata text of Clement of Alexandria and from the stroma as a biological envelope

Description

Stroma has three defined parts, inseparable from the operative

subject: The physical part, the psychological part, and the conceptual
part.

These parts were described for the philosophical redefinition of matter as M1, M2, and M3.[3][4] These parts maintain endless circularity.

The physical part (M1) also has inseparable three parts, the interior or dintorno, the contour and the environment. These parts are being permanently studied in biology, mathematics, design..

The psychic or psychological part (M2) refers to the search for truth or subjective expression. This part is the relational part between the physical and conceptual and studied various Social Sciences and arts.

The logical part (M3) of the stroma distinguishes the true from the apparent (language, science and philosophy)

Stromas operate in time evolving from one to another (phenomonology and history)

A stroma can in turn host numerous stromata (classification and categorization)

Examples

- The eagle stroma in flight, from the human operative subject, has a physical M1 part, and in it the contour, its feathers, its beak, its wings ... it has an interior that we assume makes it move. That eagle has an environment like the air, the dam, the forest... the eagle estrone has a psychic part M2 in the human observer that doubts its intentions etc. .. and also a conceptual part M3 some truths already established about the eagle, its concept

- The building stroma consists of parts that make up other parts. The building was before stone or wood that before was a tree, etc. [1]

Concept development

Both the stromatic philosophy[5] of A. Muñoz and the stromatrology[6] of Urbina have been developed from this concept

Various scientific studies in different fields support this concept, especially in the field of sports[7], literature[5], art[8], pictorial art[9], music[8], politics[10] and ecology[11]

Stromatology

The Spanish philosopher Ricardo Sánchez Ortiz de Urbina advocates a stromatological phenomenological philosophy or, briefly, a «stromatology». As soon as the interrelation of its levels and parts is known, this structure gives rise to an architectural one. This architecture also functions as a phenomenological «tectonics», insofar as the fact that the layers or levels occupy higher or lower places becomes essentially significant. Stroma is, in short, a phenomenological level, and «stromatology», therefore, the theory on the functioning of these levels[12]

Stromatic philosophy

The Spanish philosopher Antonio Muñoz Ballesta develops the stromatic philosophy, the conception of the stroma of Philosophical Materialism from a realistic point of view and close to the philosophy of language and literature, taking into account the "Critique of literary reason" of Jesus G. Maestro[13]

The stromatic philosophy redefines, therefore, the Mi of philosophical Materialism in the Stromatic Ei and rationally sustains a new ontology: “There is no M1, nor M2, nor M3 without being stromas"[14]

References

  1. ^ a b Gustavo Bueno, Estroma, retrieved 2021-12-31
  2. ISSN 0926-7220
    .
  3. .
  4. ^ "Gustavo Bueno". fgbueno.es. Retrieved 2022-01-01.
  5. ^
    OCLC 1191455815.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link
    )
  6. ^ "Dialnet Métricas - Documento Introducción a la estromatología". dialnet.unirioja.es. Retrieved 2021-12-30.
  7. OCLC 898025506
    .
  8. ^ a b de Urbina, Ricardo S. O. "Arte, estética y fenomenología". Boletín de estudios de filosofía y cultura Manuel Mindán. 12: 11–30.
  9. ISSN 2530-030X
    .
  10. ^ "Luis Carlos Martín Jiménez, ¿De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de política? En torno al Primer ensayo sobre las categorías de las ciencias políticas, de Gustavo Bueno, El Catoblepas 186:2, 2019". www.nodulo.org. Retrieved 2022-02-03.
  11. ^ Hernández, Rafael Casado. "Filosofía del monte". El Catoblepas. 197.
  12. ISSN 1885-1088
    .
  13. OCLC 1141131081.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link
    )
  14. ^ Muñoz, Antonio (2019). Estromática gnoseológica de la literatura y demás artes». ¿Cómo estudiar la literatura desde la ciencia y la filosofía? (in Spanish). Vigo- Pontevedra (España): Editorial Academia del Hispanismo. Vigo- Pontevedra (España). p. 115.