Ernest Brooks (photographer)

This is a good article. Click here for more information.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Ernest Brooks
WWI images
Children2
AwardsOrder of the Crown (Belgium)
Croix de Guerre

Brooks on the Western Front, 1917

Ernest Brooks (23 February 1876 – 1957) was a British photographer, best known for his war photography from the First World War. He was the first official photographer to be appointed by the British military, and produced several thousand images between 1915 and 1918, more than a tenth of all British official photographs taken during the war. His work was often posed and formal, but several of his less conventional images are marked by a distinctive use of silhouette. Before and immediately after the war he worked as an official photographer to the Royal Family, but was dismissed from this appointment and stripped of his official honours in 1925, for reasons that were not officially made public.

Early life

A front-line combat photograph: soldiers of the Wiltshire Regiment going "over the top" on 7 August 1916, during the Battle of the Somme.[1]
Wounded British soldiers and German prisoners heading to the rear during the Battle of Bazentin Ridge (part of the battle of the Somme), 19 July 1916.[2]
Image taken by Brooks during the Battle of Broodseinde, showing a group of soldiers of the 8th East Yorkshire Regiment moving up to the front, silhouetted against the skyline.[3][4]

Brooks was born on 23 February 1876 at

Draycott Moor near Faringdon, the son of a farm labourer.[5] He grew up near Windsor, Berkshire, where his father afterwards worked in the Great Park, and as a child frequently encountered members of the Royal Family.[6]

After leaving school in 1890, he worked as a boy on the estates, where one of his duties was to look after a mule given to

Career

His first encounter with photography came after he took a position in the household of Lady Vivian, widow of

Realising that he could support himself on this income, Brooks left Lady Vivian's employment, and returned to Windsor. Here, he worked as a freelance newspaper photographer, using his contacts within the royal household to arrange access to his subjects. After a short period, he became an official photographer to the Royal Family. In 1906 he accompanied

Alfonso XIII, where he took the first formal portrait of the couple before their wedding.[9]

Brooks' photographs were published in numerous newspapers including the

exclusive rights.[12] Each photograph sold for around 10s 6d.[13]

In late 1910, he accompanied the Duke of Connaught to South Africa, and the next year went with King George V to India for the Delhi Durbar, where he had the opportunity to photograph the King on a tiger hunt as well as in more formal contexts.[14] After returning from India he left the royal household to open a studio on Buckingham Palace Road in central London,[15] meanwhile continuing to describe himself as the Official Photographer to the King and Queen.[16]

World War I

After the outbreak of the First World War he served in the

Gallipoli landings were being prepared, Winston Churchill (then First Lord of the Admiralty), who had himself been a war correspondent, arranged for there to be journalists and photographers accompanying the expeditionary force. Brooks, as a professional photographer already in uniform, was appointed as the Admiralty official photographer.[10] In March 1916, he was transferred from the Admiralty to the War Office, given the honorary rank of second lieutenant and appointed the official photographer for the Western Front.[18]

He was the only professional photographer to cover the

Beaumont Hamel.[19] In 1917 he was appointed a Chevalier of the Belgian Order of the Crown.[20] In 1918, he covered the Italian campaign and naval activity.[21] The same year, he was awarded the French Croix de Guerre.[22]

After the war

He later returned to royal service, accompanying the

Mildred Harris Chaplin, passed herself off as the niece of a local dignitary in order to be photographed, whilst another offered Brooks a bribe of a thousand dollars to arrange a picture. Brooks admitted that he "nearly gave in", but backed out at the last minute for fear of offending the Prince. He was less successful in avoiding offence with another photograph, this time of the Prince in his bath during the voyage. After it was published, George V called it inappropriate and Brooks was reprimanded.[24]

For reasons that were not publicly disclosed, in 1925 his appointment as a royal photographer was cancelled

McClure's Magazine, "Kings, Princes, Governors", which gave "intimate anecdotes" of the royal court.[28] An American newspaper speculated that his downfall was connected to another indiscreet photograph of the Prince of Wales, showing the Prince dressed in a woman's kimono and wig after appearing in a play;[29] however, this photograph was taken and published in October, during the Prince's return from a trip to South America, well after Brooks had departed.[30]

In 1926, he filed for

1939 National Register, he was living in Clapham with his wife and two daughters, and listed his occupation as "unemployed press photographer".[34]

Brooks later moved with his wife to Hendon, where he lived until his death in 1957.[35]

Style and legacy

Much of his wartime work, though technically proficient and consistent,[36] was rather conventional, often involving posed photographs rather than more candid impromptu shots of his subjects.[37] His work was noted as being characterised by a "conscious seeking after a publishable photograph",[36] and it was recorded that he occasionally persuaded soldiers to pose for staged pictures of routine activity in the trenches.[38] However, he was insistent that combat photographs were never faked – "we have strict instructions not to do – we have never done it".[39] He had a fondness for a dramatic use of silhouette, with images composed to show soldiers walking along a ridge against the light. These images, where individual men were not easily recognisable, often were used to illustrate the "anonymous heroes" of the war.[40]

Brooks was the first and the longest-serving of the British war photographers, and took more than 4,400 images.[41] This was the most of any individual photographer, and represented more than 10% of all the official photographs.[42] A large collection of his photographs is now held by the Imperial War Museum, and a second collection is held by the National Library of Scotland as part of Earl Haig's papers; both have been digitised.

Several formal images from his pre-war service with the Royal Family are held by the

Princess Alexandra, taken at their wedding.[43] There are also two portraits of the young Prince John, both in 1913.[44]

References

  1. ^ Imperial War Museum. "The First World War 1914 – 1918: The Western Front: The Somme Offensive 1916 (Q 1142)". Imperial War Museum Collections Search. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
  2. ^ Imperial War Museum. "The Battle of the Somme 1 July – 18 November 1916 (Q 800)". Imperial War Museum Collections Search. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
  3. ^ Imperial War Museum. "Official First World War Photographers (Q 2978)". Imperial War Museum Collections Search. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
  4. ^ National Library of Scotland. "(311) C.2494 – Troops moving up at eventide – men of a Yorkshire regiment on the march". First World War 'Official Photographs'. Retrieved 21 February 2012.
  5. ^ Draycott Moor is taken from the 1881 census; in later censuses he often gave Kingston Bagpuize. The date of birth is given as 23 February 1876 in the 1939 Register, and his reported ages match this in all available censuses, but in his Royal Naval service record he dropped two years and gave his birth as 23 February 1878.
  6. ^ Brooks (1921), p. 204
  7. 1902 Coronation procession – and likely in 1901; Brooks mentions in passing that he had "Regimental Number 1", and this appears to have been assigned in 1901
    .
  8. ^ Brooks (1921), pp. 204-5. The identification of the Vivian household ("a lady of quality") is based on the twins being Maids of Honour to Queen Alexandra, which is referred to by Brooks.
  9. ^ Brooks (1921), pp. 205-07.
  10. ^ a b Carmichael, p. 36
  11. ^ The Guardian carried a photograph of the "King's Children at Balmoral", 22 September 1910; this is the first picture in their files attributed to Brooks.
  12. ^ Brooks (1921), p. 209
  13. ^ Brooks (1921), p. 206
  14. ^ Brooks (1921), pp. 207-8
  15. ^ Brooks (1921), p. 208
  16. ^ London telephone directory for January 1914, p. 131; 1915, p. 101
  17. ^ "Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve: Records of Service, WW1—Image details—Brooks, Ernest". DocumentsOnline. The National Archives. Retrieved 7 August 2009.
  18. ^ Carmichael, p. 48
  19. ^ Carmichael, p. 49
  20. ^ "No. 30302". The London Gazette (Supplement). 21 September 1917. p. 9862.
  21. ^ Bourne, p. 40; Carmichael, p. 66
  22. ^ "No. 30568". The London Gazette. 8 March 1918. p. 3095.
  23. ^ Brooks (1921), p. 211
  24. ^ Brooks (1921), p. 212
  25. ^ The Times, 6 May 1925; p. 19
  26. ^ "No. 33044". The London Gazette. 5 May 1925. p. 3025.
  27. ^ "Hockey Match Scene". Norwood News. 7 April 1925. p. 4.
  28. ^ "Publications". Ballymena Observer. 11 September 1925. p. 6.
  29. ^ "Those "Awful" Pictures which Peeved Royalty". Sarasota Herald-Tribune. 27 December 1925. p. 22.
  30. ^ "Our Notebook". Illustrated London News. 24 October 1925. p. 16.
  31. ^ "No Assets". Westminster Gazette. 21 May 1926. p. 4.
  32. ^ "Scene at a Ball: Press Photographer who was Ejected". Hartlepool Northern Daily Mail. 13 July 1928. p. 5.
  33. Hulton Press Library; nos. 2666173 and 3355372 at Getty Images
    .
  34. ^ "1939 England and Wales Register – London, Wandsworth, AXRD". ancestry.co.uk. Ancestry. Retrieved 28 May 2020.
  35. ^ "Ernest Brooks, photographer at Historic Camera". historiccamera.com.
  36. ^ a b Carmichael, p. 39
  37. ^ Carmichael, pp. 61–63
  38. ^ Carmichael, p. 52
  39. ^ Fraser
  40. ^ Carmichael, p. 63
  41. ^ Bourne, p.40
  42. ^ Carmichael, p. 142
  43. ^ "Ernest Brooks – National Portrait Gallery". npg.org.uk. Retrieved 18 June 2020.
  44. Hulton Press Library; nos. 3304766 and 3305272 at Getty Images
    .

Sources

External links