File talk:Cher Lloyd - Sorry I'm Late (Official Album Cover).png

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Album cover

@

]

It's best to include the main album cover, which would include the Parental Advisory label. I'll go ahead and upload it. ]
And I'm pretty sure I already mentioned this point in June, when ]
No change in the album cover? Maybe it's just my device, but it looks identical to the last. ]
Clear your cache. Also, ]
I see it now. I linked up above to Epic's website, and it is the explicit album cover. ]

The fact you guys had this discussion without me present, and deem as a "consensus" or a final discussion is kind of against Wikipedia. Anyway, when the album cover was on Epic's press site, it was WITHOUT THE LABEL. I did NOT edit it out. I have the original file if you do wish to see it. The Epic press site is offline, and when it was last online, Cher was removed. To make an accusation is wrong and kind of insulting. In fact the filename, ripped from Epic's press, is CL_SorryImLate_Explicit_5x5_noPA Glossy Photo_0. It was uploaded without a Parent sticker. As such, the non-tagged cover should remain until a more formal decision and discussion is had, per the site's policy on consensus. I have zero reason to lie, to regardless of that,

it's not assuming good faith to make accusations against someone continuously. This was the URL, however, like I've stated, the Epic's press site has been taken offline. And this is what would've been the URL for the image, but again, the press site no longer exists, and was unaware of archiving back then, or I would have archived. livelikemusic my talk page! 00:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

To be honest, I don't really have a preference on the matter. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It should be used without the

parental advisory emblem affixed to the cover, where we have another adequate cover without one.The Cross Bearer (talk) 00:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

@]
No, I was not online. I was offline, at work. If I could get the page through Wayback Machine I would, but only the main page (Epicpublicity.com) is available. And I thought this would've been a nearly two-year issue, I would've attempted to make an archive of the page. livelikemusic my talk page! 01:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(←)

]

You ARE accusing me by saying it is alternated, when it is not altered. I swear on my father's grave that it is not altered, and came from the URL's provided above. That is an accusation, and that is showing that it's not good faith in my part. livelikemusic my talk page! 01:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
From ]
Just to prove a point, I have the data from Epicpublicity.com, to show that's where the image came from, again, just to prove a point that I'm being accused of something I did not do (with my personal info blocked out, for privacy reasons). 1 livelikemusic my talk page! 02:03, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AND, Slovakia online retailer here showcases the explicit album cover without the explicit tag. Which while that it not a lot to go on, it is an online retailer that contains the untagged image. livelikemusic my talk page! 02:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done responding to your victim rant, as I've explained numerous times why no one is attacking you, but the image from the Slovakian website is suitable. ]
I'm gonna drop this whole thing after this. LLM, first of all, thank you for finding another website for the album cover. Now the album cover is notable. No one was accusing you? I believe we were wanting to talk out the policy on the album cover, per case of ]
@
Ilovechristianmusic: I would add Wikipedia is not censored to the parental advocacy movement, where this emblem on her music on an encyclopedia could deem it as being unsavory and revolting giving it a tremendously bad negative connotation.The Cross Bearer (talk) 23:27, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
@]
@
Ilovechristianmusic: Do as you wish, and see if other editors agree with your so-called density of thought, with regards to the parental advisory?The Cross Bearer (talk) 06:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

@

]

@
FRINGE, and unacceptable to use with regards to the cover artwork. You are more than obliged to say in the text, the album has been issued with a parental advisory warning, in the text.The Cross Bearer (talk) 22:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]