User talk:Chasewc91

I know. I hardly ever do shout, especially on an edit summary, where people can conclude, understandably, that the shouter is not the reliable party. I would have concluded the same. Thanks for re-reviewing. I guess I felt too strongly. Quis separabit? 00:21, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there i see you're editing discography-related article so that's why i'm writing to u. Someone reverted my edit on Azealia Banks discography for no reason like wtf. Please tell that person that if a remix version of single is aviable on iTunes it means those are just promo singles and should be under the section promotional singles. Many featured discographies like this or this work the same way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.130.141.152 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 22 July 2015

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 22:54, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi! Thanks for your response, but I'm confused. The last picture I put on was taken directly from the article, which had been preciously approved. Why can it not be used in the info box? It represents Caitlyn today, rather than the old Bruce Jenner picture. Please explain. Thanks.--Mimi C. (talk) 00:37, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 01:05, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks! Got it! --Mimi C. (talk) 01:43, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am still confused why the images I uploaded are not accepted. I got them through Creative Commons with the correct Attribution that states:

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format & Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Please explain. Thanks.--Mimi C. (talk) 23:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 23:54, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm in agreement with this edit except: that's a free image; why make it so tiny? The entire purpose of an infobox image is to identify the article subject; since we're using a free image, and Houston is predominant anyway, BKB in sunglasses shrunk down fails IMO to identify her as preferred. —

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 04:39, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Cool, thank you. Meantime, per a previous discussion at the article's talk, I think "first cousin once removed" and the like is overkill for an infobox. How about simply "cousin"? —

^ATalkPage 🖖 04:41, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 04:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I tend to agree with that, but I'd have to read the article talk again to see if there was ever anything resembling a consensus on the issue. —

^ATalkPage 🖖 04:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Excuse me, but I believe that's what my edit falls under. "Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content." You already made an edit summary on the Title EP page about how that user's edit didn't use correct English, so I didn't see why I had to do it too. Also, I, and several other editors, know you've been stalking and harassing people editing Trainor's pages, and people have already shown proof of this on other talk pages. For your own good, I would really suggest you cut it out before you're reported to the administrators. --Markhoris (talk) 19:39, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 20:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Also, I don't know what the fuck you're talking about with this: You already made an edit summary on the Title EP page about how that user's edit didn't use correct English, so I didn't see why I had to do it too. Unless I've looked over something, I don't have any recent edits to that article that are marked as minor, when improperly marking minor edits is what I cautioned you against doing.

Chase (talk | contributions) 20:19, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

I recently started a move request. --George Ho (talk) 05:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't know why did you redirect the article for the song 'Bombastic' but I got it back bc I don't think it deserved a redirect User:Sabinbik22 - talk 19:21, 6 August 2015‎

@

WP:NSONG: Songs and singles are probably notable if they have been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label ... This excludes media reprints of press releases, or other publications where the artist, its record label, agent, or other self-interested parties advertise or speak about the work. Only one source that is even somewhat reliable (Idolator

) has discussed the song, and it does not meet the quoted criteria as it is a self-promoting interview with the artist. As you reverted with no reason given and this song clearly does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria, I will be returning the article to a redirect. Please do not restore the article again without leaving an explanatory edit summary on why this song should have an article.

Also, when writing on a talk page, please leave new comments at the bottom of the page and use four tildes (~~~~) so that the date is included along with your username.

Chase (talk | contributions) 20:10, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

This. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 17:57, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what prompted this, but do know you'll be missed if you retire and your work will not be forgotten. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:22, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks,

Chase (talk | contributions) 18:30, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

No problem. Just thought I'd let you know. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:04, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Before reverting changes please discuss. The article on Beyonce describes her as a dancer and in the dancer template there is a height entry. Thus I think it is a relevant piece of information for the article. If the source (Google search DB) is not authoritative enough you can tag the information as not reliable but there is no need to remove it. ziMBRicchio 10:47, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 13:46, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 18:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi Chase. This thoroughly concerns me about the notability of this article. I'm no expert at BLP and article deletion policies, hence why I'm bringing it to your attention. I know it's an awful forum and all but what's been said there made me hesitant to bring this up on the article's talk page. CoolMarc 21:30, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chase (talk | contributions) 21:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

The talk page is run and blanked by her PR team I've noticed... CoolMarc 22:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 21:45, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an editor for whom you left a talk page caution.[1] The thread is Professor JR on political articles. Thank you. - Wikidemon (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning. Please feel free to comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forget Forever. Regards. Abi-Maria (talk) 06:11, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

]

Happy New Year!

	Happy New Year!
	Best wishes for a wonderful 2016! -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 23:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Policy discussion in progress

There is a policy discussion in progress at the Manual of Style which affects the capitalization of "Smells Like Teen Spirit", a question in which you previously participated. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — LlywelynII 11:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that this was more than half a year ago, but I have to disagree with your RM closure. Firstly, with 3 supports and 4 opposes, there is no clear consensus in this discussion "that making the article title more ambiguous is not helpful to the reader", and certainly no consensus to close this as "not moved". Secondly, the opposes by In ictu oculi and 67.70.32.190 failed to address the nominator's rationale, and the oppose by Richhoncho ignored the

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 14:19, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

An editor has asked for a

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Madonna Rebel Heart physical standard cover.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 22:21, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not retire! MaranoFan (talk) 07:23, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where is there consensus for a blatant violation of multiple Wikipedia policies and guidelines? This is now officiallyt disputed, and must be discussed on the talk page. I continue to hold my belief that use of the image in this matter violates multiple Wikipedia policies and guidelines.

It is not being used minimally, as required by NFCC. The small, specific image violates NFCC 8 because it does not improve reader's understanding of the subject more than the album cover also containing the copyrighted work in question does (which improves understanding by identifying the album via its cover, and displaying the copyrighted work "Love Symbol #2"), and is being used twice.

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 18:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

One user in this FFD personally admits that there is no case law on applying Wikipedia NFCC policy to this particular case. ViperSnake151  Talk  04:29, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the discussion was: keep as is. Start a new discussion if you want to see a change.

Chase (talk | contributions) 04:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for keeping an Eye on Adele's Award Page ... is the Lead ok now?

Pauseypaul (talk) 10:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 15:26, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Can you explain to me what the "Deletion review" process entails? I see you renominated them, but I don't understand what the process accomplishes. Thanks. Carbrera (talk) 00:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chase (talk | contributions) 00:51, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

So "endorse" means that they agree with the user who closed the decision, and in this case, they agree that "Truth" should be redirected, while "Asking 4 It" and "Rare" remain articles? Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 00:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's in regards to whether or not the closure was appropriate, not an opportunity to !vote again. Please read the DRV page. Thank you.

Chase (talk | contributions) 01:09, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

These edits lost me. With a few exceptions (that we're getting around to), the majority of the article is well-referenced with the exception of 2014: The Voice. Why the general tag rather than the more specific one? 🖖ATS / Talk 23:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 23:09, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Okay, thanks. Cheers! 🖖ATS / Talk 23:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening. You are invited to participate in the move discussion on

I noticed you made this edit to Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Justin Bieber and was trying to incorporate an acheivement section to Justin Bieber like this one at Lady Gaga. Can you help me with this or is what you wrote an appropriate section? Thanks. Chase (talk) 07:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Like I'm Gonna Lose You, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.  — Calvin999 17:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I changed A-Yo to the second single on the Joanne page and was told the source I added wasn't credible. Some user is obsessively reverting my edits. So I guess it is reliable? --Jennica✿ ^Talk 18:25, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 22:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes that's the one I used and it was touted as unreliable by IndianBio. --Jennica✿ ^Talk 22:13, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chasewc91. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit here, what exactly is the difference between a producer/primary producer and a co-producer? Last I checked, a co-producer is somebody who produces something along with one or more other people. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:03, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 23:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Exact wording from the booklet: "Produced by Mark Ronson, Lady Gaga, BloodPop® and co-produced by Josh Homme, Jeff Bhasker".

Chase (talk | contributions) 23:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

I see. Interesting how they would single out certain people over others like that. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:11, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's common with a lot of album credits (not just Gaga) and doesn't make sense to me. Especially when you see some people credited as "co-producers" and others credited for "additional production". But I do agree that co-producer seems to imply something that 2 or more people produced together, and I see how it can be confusing. But it's best to give the credits as specified by the artist/label.

Chase (talk | contributions) 23:13, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

The notion doesn't make sense to me either. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:32, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious about why you removed the state name from

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 23:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

What about

WP:USPLACE? Magnolia677 (talk) 00:09, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 00:22, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Your reasons for removing the state name also seem supported by policy. And while

MOS:CA does (see this discussion). I have seen this discussed a few places before regarding the removal of the state from places like Manhattan. I won't revert, and will invite you to a discussion if I start something about this someplace. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

I restored Kevin De Clue. The prod rules suggests that if anyone objects to the deletion than it should not be deleted as a prod. While I suppose one might argue that "anybody" doesn't include the subject, it doesn't say that. I've restored it per a request received at OTRS. I will leave it up to you if it should go through the AfD process but I wanted you to be aware of the restoration.--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I believe it's been 7 days since your proposed name change. I was wondering when it would carried out? Thanks! --Jennica✿ / ^talk 22:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chase, did you have any discussion with User:Homeostasis07 regarding the extra album cover in Rebel Heart about its notability? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 13:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Thought so as well, the user is claiming the contrary. Take a look at User_talk:Aspects#Rebel_Heart_revision. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 13:53, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Madonna Rebel Heart physical standard cover.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Homeostasis07 (talk) 16:59, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to weigh in

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 15:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Sure, only if you want to join in. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you removed Popcrush via

An editor has asked for a Move review of Damn (Kendrick Lamar album). Because you were involved in the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. — TheMagnificentist 08:59, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We should have a community discussion to decide if the recurring collaborators should stay. Foxnpichu (talk) 21:19, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 21:37, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

But does everybody agree with you when you say it is “trivial [...] with no context”? Foxnpichu (talk) 10:03, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is the context of it? If there's no context for it and it's just information for the sake of information, it's indiscriminate.

Chase (talk | contributions) 14:47, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Touche, I guess. Foxnpichu (talk) 18:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Chasewc91. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to weigh in this discussion regarding the infobox should keep "playlist" instead of mixtape. Only if you interested. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Chase, Kevin DeClue Here. I was wondering why you took down the WIKI of me? Happy new Year K DeClue [email protected] 68.8.205.184 (talk) 16:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:51, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin DeClue

Chase, My name is Kevin DeClue and I am a multi platinum music producer. I have been #2 on the Billboard charts and have sold 6 million records. A very small percent of the worlds population has done this. You can see thatI co/wrote Mr James Dean as well as Last Song. Someone continues to say that I am not a valuable artist and voted my site down. They then put up a picture of me when I was young singing in a bar. Can you help in any way??

(

WP:BLPs (biographies of living persons). -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 14:10, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

115.164.182.252 (talk) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!

---

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

115.164.182.252 (talk) 18:44, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How are you?

Chase, don't see you much around the Gaga articles nowadays? How's life? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 06:03, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@

Chase (talk | contributions) 15:51, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm fine. Had taken a sabbatical from work, but soon will become busy as well. Are you excited for whatever Gaga has to offer? —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:12, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bangarang#Billboard

Hi. If you have an issue with my edits feel free, and we can reach a consensus. Thanks. 183.171.123.78 (talk) 17:35, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Chasewc91. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scream/Childhood

Can you please split the article of double-A side single Scream/Childhood into two articles: Scream (Michael Jackson and Janet Jackson song) or Scream (Michael Jackson song)

Childhood (Michael Jackson song)

There is a clear consensus here and here on article's talk page.Thank you... -

talk) 15:21, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi @

Chase (talk | contributions) 16:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply ]

January 2020

Hello, back in December, you edited Don't Smile At Me, but your edit was inaccurate. You said that the goal was to keep a chain that goes to other articles, but that is not right. The chronology needs to have every release from discography (in this case, if it’s an EP, album, compilation or live album), rather than just ones with articles. I did not undo your reverts, but MiaHarris74 did. CheatCodes4ever (talk) 23:39, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply ]

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here .
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply ]

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here .
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:17, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here !

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]