Fin-de-Siècle Splendor
Fin-de-Siècle Splendor: Repressed Modernities of Late Qing Fiction, 1848-1911 is a 1997 non-fiction book by
Background
The title "Fin-de-Siècle Splendor" refers to a renewal of society as well as decadence and loss of previous values that Wang argued appeared in both Chinese and European literary societies of that time period.[3]
At the time Wang worked at Columbia University as a professor of Chinese literature.[3]
Wang defined the start of the "late Qing Dynasty" as beginning in 1849,
Contents
The book analyzed over sixty works,[6] including around twenty novels.[4] It covers four genres of late Qing fiction: chivalric and court case, courtesan (novels with erotic and sentimental themes), "novels of exposure", and "science fantasy".[7] David Wang argued that until the time his book was published, these genres had not received sufficient attention from historians specializing in Chinese fiction nor from literary critics.[8]
Most genres were already accepted ways of classifying Qing Dynasty fiction.[9] Chivalric and court-case books are a combination of two genres: one about judges, or court-case works, and one about a heroic individual who seeks to right wrongs, or chivalric (侠义; xiáyì) works.[10] Some categorizations of novels originated from Lu Xun.[1] In Chinese, Lu Xun referred to the prostitution novels as 狭邪小说; xiáxié xiǎoshuō, and to the "novels of exposure," which document poor urban residents and their troubles and criticize society, as 谴责小说; qiǎnzé xiǎoshuō.[10] Wang used Lu Xun's categorizations of novels but referred to them under different names.[1]
The "science fantasy" classification is an original idea from Wang.[11] The science fantasy (科学小说; kēxué xiǎoshuō) novels combined Chinese traditional storytelling with Western science fiction;[10] the Chinese storytelling genre is called zhiguai (志怪) in Mandarin.[11] Librarians and publishers usually call this genre, which usually includes late 20th century Chinese fiction, as "science fiction and fantasy."[1]
In his principal chapters, 2 through 5,[1][8] he introduces particular works, some of which are lesser-known and some of which are well-known and explains why he believes they are modern. Some of the content originated from his 1993 Chinese-language book Xiǎoshuō Zhōngguó: Wǎn Qīng dào dāngdài de Zhōngwén xiǎoshuō (小說中國:晚清到當代的中文小說 "China's Novels: Chinese-language Novels of the late Qing Dynasty through the present day") and other earlier works written by him.[12]
Philip F. Williams of Arizona State University stated that some people reading the book may need to consult other scholarly reference guides in order to help them understand Fin-de-Siècle Splendor due to the absence of edition, publication, and serialization information of some works chronicled within the book.[1]
Wang decided not to write about
Introduction and chapters
The book's introduction is 12 pages long,[1] and discusses Wang's explanation of the term "repressed modernities".[14] The author argues why he believes late Qing Dynasty fiction is "modern" in the book's introduction, and he defines modernity as, in the words of Helena Heroldová of Archiv Orientální, "a phenomenon that is new and innovative" and that, in her words, he thought that modernity combined possibilities of new things.[3] Wang stated that Qing works used new types of characters, ideologies, narrative formats, situations, and themes.[12] Wang was opposed to the idea that modernity meant developing linearly into something more advanced.[3]
"Repressed Modernities," Chapter 1, describes the historical conditions in the Qing Dynasty. Heroldová argued that it was an extension of the introduction.
"Edifying Depravity: The Courtesan Novel," the second chapter, discusses courtesan novels. Wang argues that concepts of
"Justice Undone, Chivalric and Court-case Fiction," Chapter 3 discusses chivalric and court case books, which Wang argues influenced later works made regarding China's revolutions.
"Abject Carnival: Grotesque Exposés," Chapter 4 discusses "novels of exposure,"
"Confused Horizons: Science Fantasy," Chapter 5, discusses science fantasy novels and how they helped usher in development in the science and technology field.
Chapter 6, "Return to Go: Contemporary Chinese Fiction and Its late Qing Antecedents," discusses how Chinese fiction from the late 1980s to the present,
C. D. Alison Bailey of the University of British Columbia argued that the court case and chivalric chapter and the science fantasy chapter both had the "most persuasive, indeed fascinating" analysis.[6]
Reception
Bailey argued that the book was "an innovative, energetically argued, and important book, as varied and rich as the period and genres it opens up for us so fruitfully and eloquently."[6] She argued that sometimes it seemed like "modernity" was used to mean "variety".[6] Bailey believed that some of the summarization present in the book did not adequately cover its depth due to the coverage of works unfamiliar at the time to the audience and the book's scope itself. She stated that sometimes there was too much repetition, believing that Wang might have been unsure about the comprehension levels of his readers, and that there were errors in romanizations and other mistakes in typing. She also stated the bibliography and glossary were not fully developed.[6]
Eide concluded that the book as a whole "will serve as a useful source book for future research" and that the four primary chapters "are very well argued".[22]
Hegel wrote that the book is equally "informative" and "fascinating to read" since Wang used "great enthusiasm and authority" when writing it.[2] While Fin-de-Siècle Splendor had bibliographic referencing for cited works that had been reprinted recently, Hegel argues that the book should have included that referencing for all of the works cited. Hegel concluded that his criticisms were "small" and that the book is "an excellent introduction to the literature of that period."[21]
Heraldová stated that the book was an "important contribution".[10]
Michel Hockx wrote in the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society that the book is "a joy to read" due to the author's "enthusiasm and devotion".[23]
Huters argued that the book was "the best introduction to and analysis of late Qing fiction that exists in any language."[5] Huters argued that by expanding the scope of late Qing fiction, Wang inadvertently blurred the distinction between that genre and early 20th century Chinese fiction, and he also argued that the deliberate vagueness and redefining of "the modern," "modernism" and "modernisms" "serves simply to push back the definition of the modern to a point seventy years before 1919."[24]
Xiaobing Tang of the University of Chicago wrote that overall the book "should be recognized as an important development in the much needed research on late-Qing fiction"; he disagreed with some of the conclusions made by Wang about the nature of the genre.[25]
J. W. Walls of
Williams stated that the arguments were done "cogently" and that it is "a major contribution to scholarship on late imperial and twentieth- century Chinese fiction."[1]
See also
References
- Bailey, C. D. Alison ()
- Eide, Elizabeth (1999). "Fin-de-Siècle Splendor: Repressed Modernities of Late Qing Fiction, 1849-1911 by David Der-wei Wang". 62 (2). )
- )
- Heroldová, Helena (January 1998). "David Der-wei Wang, "Fin-de-Siècle Splendor. Repressed Modernities of Late Qing Fiction, 1849-1911". Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic
- )
- Huters, Theodore (JSTOR 2658419.)
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link - Tang, Xiaobing ()
- Walls, J W (December 1997). "Fin-de-siecle splendor: Repressed modernities of late Qing fiction, 1849-1911". Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries.
- Williams, Philip F. (Thefreelibrary
Notes
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Williams, p. 371.
- ^ a b c Hegel, p. 202. "David Wang's 王德威 project here[...]with great enthusiasm and authority, making his book as fascinating to read as it is informative."
- ^ a b c d e f Heroldová, p. 285 (Archive)
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Williams, p. 372.
- ^ a b Huters, p. 173.
- ^ a b c d e Bailey, p. 92.
- ^ a b Walls.
- ^ a b Eide, p. 294. "The four chapters on these topics constitute the nucleus of the book."
- ^ Tang, p. 623-624.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Heroldová, p. 286 (Archive)
- ^ a b Tang, p. 624.
- ^ a b c Hegel, p. 203.
- ^ Williams p. 371-372.
- ^ a b Tang, p. 623.
- ^ a b Hegel, p. 204.
- ^ Tang, p. 626.
- ^ Hockx, p. 503 - States that Lao Can is in both Chapters 3 and 4
- ^ Hegel, p. 204-205.
- ^ a b c d e f g Hegel, p. 205.
- ^ Hegel, p. 205-206.
- ^ a b Hegel, p. 206.
- ^ a b Eide, p. 395. "In short, he wants to show how the modernist tendencies[...]He largely succeeds."
- ^ Hockx, p. 504.
- ^ Huters, p. 174.
- ^ Tang, p. 630.