George W. Grace

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
George W. Grace
Alfred L. Kroeber
Academic work
InstitutionsSouthern Illinois University, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
Doctoral studentsRobert Blust
Main interestsAustronesian languages

George William Grace (8 September 1921 in

linguist who specialized in historical and comparative linguistics, ethnolinguistics, and Austronesian languages, especially the Oceanic languages of Melanesia. He joined the Department of Linguistics at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa in 1964, serving three years as chair (1966–1969) and three decades as editor of Oceanic Linguistics (1962–1991), a journal he founded while teaching anthropology at Southern Illinois University
(1960–1964).

Biography

Grace was raised on the

Malayo-Polynesian
linguistics at the Bishop Museum.

He completed a Ph.D. dissertation in 1958 under

East-West Center
in Honolulu (1964), he was hired by the newly formed Department of Linguistics at the University of Hawaiʻi, where he has remained, apart from further fieldwork in New Caledonia (1970, 1971–1973) and New Guinea (1976).

Theoretical work

Apart from his research on Austronesian languages, Grace also worked on more theoretical questions close to philosophy of language like the relationship between language and thought. In his book The Linguistic Construction of Reality, he discusses two opposed views of language that he claims are present in the linguistic research community of his time. What he means by "view" is a definition of language by linguists and also by society at large, what we think it is and how it works. He introduces his own terminology and calls them the Mapping-view and the Reality-construction-view of language, with him being a proponent of the latter. [2] Grace presumes that proponents of the Mapping-view think of different languages as dividing up the same objective world into different categories, quite like different political maps divide up the same territory in different ways. The Reality-Construction-view on the other hand says that each language embodies a different conceptual construction of reality, which is a stronger claim than the Mapping-view's. [3] One key difference between the two views is their attitude towards the postulate that "anything that can be said in one language can be said in any other language",[4] which translates as the claim that translation from one language to another is always possible. According to Grace, the Mapping-view accepts this postulate, while the Reality-Construction-view rejects it. [5] His unconventional terminology has been suggested as one reason why his theoretical work has received comparatively little attention in the scientific community. [6]

Reality-Construction

As mentioned above, Grace was an advocate of what he called the Reality-Construction-view of language. He believed that through language, we construct our own, specific realities that we live in. This happens on two levels: First, an entire language contains a certain view of the world, which he calls a Conceptual World. Second, each time we say something we construct a certain Conceptual Event that reflects how we have chosen to characterize that which we want to talk about. We do this by means of the lexical and grammatical resources a language provides. [7] To put it in another way, he says that each language has a certain number of things that can be talked about, and certain ways of talking about these things that may not exist in other languages. [8] His theory is substantially influenced by the writings of

Etienne Bonnet de Condillac and Wilhelm von Humboldt. [9]

Selected publications

Notes

  1. ^ Obituary in the Honolulu Star Advertiser, 24 Jan 2015.
  2. ^ Grace 1987, p. 3-15.
  3. ^ Grace 1987, p. 6-7.
  4. ^ Grace 1987, p. 55.
  5. ^ Grace 1987, p. 55-57.
  6. ^ Blust 2015, p. 592.
  7. ^ Grace 1987, p. 28-34.
  8. ^ Grace 1987, p. 98-102.
  9. ^ Grace 1987, p. 5.

References

External links

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_W._Grace&oldid=1217654016"