Girard incident
| Native name | ジラード事件 Jirādo jiken |
|---|---|
| Date | January 30, 1957 |
| Location | Sōmagahara Air Base, Soma, Gunma Prefecture, Japan |
| Type | Shooting of a Japanese civilian |
| Participants | William S. Girard, United States Army Specialist 3/C |
| Outcome |
|
| Casualties | |
| |
| Charges | U.S. Supreme Court case Wilson v. Girard. Girard was demoted by the U.S. Army and received a three-year suspended sentence from Japanese authorities.
IncidentOn January 30, 1957, Naka Sakai, a 46-year-old U.S. Forces Japan for live-fire exercises, and local residents would collect metal from spent ammunition to earn a living. Specialist Third Class William S. Girard, a 21-year-old enlisted man from Ottawa, Illinois, used a grenade launcher mounted on an M1 Garand rifle to fire an empty grenade cartridge at Sakai, which hit her in the back and killed her.[2]
Extradition controversyThe strong Japanese outcry over the killing precipitated a major diplomatic crisis between the United States and Japan and led to a jurisdictional dispute between the Japanese authorities and the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty.[3] The Japanese government, however, held that Girard's actions had taken place during a period of rest, making him subject to Japanese law.[2] Girard had been assigned to guard a machine gun at the firing range in between sessions of target practice; the Japanese contention was that since Girard had not fired a weapon during exercises, he could not be considered as on active duty. Eventually, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and Secretary of Defense Charles E. Wilson, fearing that trampling on Japanese feelings would jeopardize the status of crucial U.S. military bases in Japan, ruled that Girard's specific action "was not authorized", and he was turned over to the Japanese authorities for trial.[4] Girard appealed this decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, but the court declined to intervene, in the case Wilson v. Girard .
American domestic response to Girard's extradition was largely negative, sparking an intense political and media backlash against the John Bricker of Ohio called the decision a matter of "sacrificing an American soldier to appease Japanese public opinion", and the New York Daily News summed up its feelings in a headline: "To the Wolves, Soldier".[2][4] In the midst of the uproar, The New York Times, fearing that American reaction was eroding the good will earned in Asia by the initial decision to extradite, published an article lauding the positive interactions between most U.S. soldiers and Japanese civilians, including photographs of soldiers celebrating Christmas with a Japanese family while clothed in traditional Japanese attire.[5]
TrialAt the trial, a Japanese witness for the prosecution asserted that Girard had yelled a warning to Sakai before firing, but Girard himself denied ever having done so, a statement which shocked and mystified observers. Aftermath and legacyThe massive popular outcry in Japan over the Girard incident led directly to the Eisenhower administration announcing a 40 percent draw down in the number of U.S. troops stationed on Japanese soil, significantly easing tensions between the two nations and reducing local conflicts over military bases.[3] It also helped persuade the Eisenhower administration to agree to a renegotiation of the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty along lines of greater mutuality with Japan, thus solidifying the U.S.–Japan Alliance.[7] Girard himself, who was recorded as having an IQ of 90, was held in little regard by his fellow soldiers, widely viewed as a "bumpkin clown" who drank to excess and ran up debts at various Japanese establishments.[2] After his trial, he went home to America with his Taiwan-born Japanese bride, Haru "Candy" Sueyama, and was booed by fellow servicemen during his return trip.[2]
Sakai's widowed husband, Akikichi, and his six children were compensated with a mere US$1,748.32 ($18,966 in 2023) for their loss, but this monetary offer was perceived as an attempt to buy off justice by many Japanese, and Akikichi stated to U.S. authorities that "I do not thank you for it."[2] Notes
External links |