HD 134439 and HD 134440

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
HD 134439/HD 134440
Observation data
J2000.0      Equinox
2015.5
Constellation Libra
HD 134439
Right ascension 15h 10m 12.012s
Declination −16° 23′ 40.78″
Apparent magnitude (V) 9.066
HD 134440
Right ascension 15h 10m 11.88s
Declination −16° 28′ 41.39″
Apparent magnitude (V) 9.426
Characteristics
HD 134439
Evolutionary stage subdwarf
Spectral type sd:K1Fe-1
Apparent magnitude (U) 10.03
Apparent magnitude (B) 9.837
Apparent magnitude (V) 9.066
Apparent magnitude (R) 8.604
Apparent magnitude (I) 8.160
Apparent magnitude (J) 7.70
Apparent magnitude (H) 7.09
Apparent magnitude (K) 7.04
HD 134440
Evolutionary stage subdwarf
Spectral type sdK2.5
Apparent magnitude (U) 10.69
Apparent magnitude (B) 10.217
Apparent magnitude (V) 9.426
Apparent magnitude (R) 8.913
Apparent magnitude (I) 8.441
Apparent magnitude (J) 7.74
Apparent magnitude (H) 7.27
Apparent magnitude (K) 7.19
Distance
96.5 ± 0.1 ly
(29.59 ± 0.04 pc)
Semi-major axis (a)
300.6"
(0.56 ± 0.25 light-years, 35,000 ± 16,000 AU)
Details
HD 134439
dex
Other designations
GJ 9511, GJ 579.2, BUP 161
GJ 9511A: HD 134439, HIP 74235
GJ9511B: HD 134440, HIP 74234
Database references
SIMBADHD 134439
HD 134440

HD 134439 and HD 134440 are a pair of

arcseconds
every year.

The stars are believed to originate from outside of the

spectral type
would be.

Binary system

It is unknown if HD 134439 and 134440 are actually orbiting each other, as at their distance, they would have to be a minimum 0.14 light-years (8,900 au) apart from each other, which would make them one of the widest binary systems known. Further adding to this, using Gaia data, HD 134440 appears to be 0.54±0.26 light years further than HD 134439,[3] resulting in a true separation of 0.56±0.25 light years from each other. If they are orbiting each other, they would have an orbital period on the scale of 5.3±3 million years, making them one of the longest period binary systems known as well.[citation needed]

Destroyed planet

In a 2018 study, it was found that HD 134440 had a noticeably higher metallicity than HD 134439, which could be potentially explained by the star having engulfed a planet orbiting it, suggesting that it may be possible for planets to form even around stars with extremely low content of planet-forming material.[2]

References