Hamilton v. Alabama (1961)
| Hamilton v. Alabama | |
|---|---|
 U.S. LEXIS 167 | |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Ex parte Hamilton, 271 Ala. 88, 122 So. 2d 602 (1960), cert. granted, 364 U.S. 931 (1961). |
| Holding | |
| Absence of counsel for petitioner at the time of his arraignment violated his rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Douglas, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. XIV | |
Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52 (1961), was a case heard by the
not guilty. He had then been convicted and sentenced to death. The Court ruled unanimously that the absence of counsel at the time of his arraignment violated Hamilton's due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment
.
See also
External links
Works related to Hamilton v. Alabama (1961) at Wikisource- Text of Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U.S. 52 (1961) is available from: Findlaw Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |