Samia v. United States
Samia v. United States | |
---|---|
Argued March 29, 2023 Decided June 23, 2023 | |
Full case name | Adam Samia, aka Sal, aka Adam Samic v. United States |
Docket no. | 22-196 |
Citations | 599 U.S. 635 (more) |
Argument | Oral argument |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Questions presented | |
Whether the admission of a codefendant's redacted out-of-court confession that immediately inculpates a defendant based on the surrounding context violates the defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. | |
Holding | |
The Confrontation Clause was not violated by the admission of a non-testifying codefendant’s confession that did not directly inculpate the defendant and was subject to a proper limiting instruction. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh; Barrett (all but Part II–A) |
Concurrence | Barrett (in part) |
Dissent | Kagan, joined by Sotomayor, Jackson |
Dissent | Jackson |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. VI |
Samia v. United States, 599 U.S. 635 (2023), was a
United States Supreme Court case related to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[1]
Background
Adam Samia was tried along with two codefendants for the murder of a real-estate agent that took place in the Philippines. Both of Samia's codefendants admitted to participating in the murder, but disputed the government's jurisdiction over the crime. Samia, however, maintained his innocence.
The
murder for hire
, and conspiracy to commit murder for hire.
Samia appealed to the
United States Courts of Appeals had split on the question of whether a codefendant's redacted out-of-court confession must be assessed in isolation or in a broader context when determining when a violation of the Confrontation Clause
has occurred.
On August 30, 2022, Samia petitioned the
United States Supreme Court
for a writ of certiorari, which was granted on December 13, 2022. Oral arguments were held on March 29, 2023. On June 23, 2023, the Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit in a 6–3 decision.
See also
- Bruton v. United States (1968), a case outlawing the introduction of a codefendant's incriminating confession.
References
- ^ "Supreme Court Considers a Mercenary's Confession and the Confrontation Clause". New York Times. March 29, 2023.
External links
- Text of Samia v. United States, 599 U.S. 635 (2023) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion) Supreme Court (preliminary print)