Kallikratis Programme
Kallikratis programme | ||
---|---|---|
Hellenic Republic | ||
Long title
| ||
Citation | Kallikratis programme (3852/2010) (in Greek). 7 June 2010. | |
Territorial extent | Bill title 3852/2010 | |
Introduced by | Government of Greece | |
Amended by | ||
Kleisthenis I Programme (2019) |
| ||
---|---|---|
|
||
The Kallikratis Programme (Greek: Πρόγραμμα Καλλικράτης, romanized: Prógramma Kallikrátis) is the common name of Greek law 3852/2010 of 2010, a major administrative reform in Greece. It brought about the second major reform of the country's administrative divisions following the 1997 Kapodistrias reform.
Named after ancient Greek architect
History
Administrative reforms in the 1990s
1994 reforms under the socialist
Part of the subsequent
With the territorial reforms of the 1990s, Greece has been cited as the first southern European country to follow a coercive top-down approach for territorial reforms, an approach rather typical for northern European countries.[9] Though strengthened by the 1990s reforms, the prefectural second-tier level however did not meet expectations. Largely subverted by an uncoordinated but convergent anti-reform opposition, the reformed prefectures lost a number of important competences following court decisions. The numerous controversies largely undermined public trust in the prefectural level.[10]
The failed Kapodistrias II
After the electoral victory of the liberal-conservative
Only after the
Putting administrative efficiency first, the top-down reform plan was criticized as subordinating questions of
Kallikratis: New attempt at administrative reform
Following the landslide victory of the socialist
The law was adopted in May 2010 and was implemented following the
Reforms as part of the Kallikratis plan
Former (Kapodistrias, 1998–2010) | New (Kallikratis, 2011) | |
---|---|---|
decentralized agencies of national administration |
13 administrative districts ("administrative regions", Διοικητική περιφέρεια, Diikitiki periferia) |
7 administrative districts ("decentralized administrations", Αποκεντρωμένη Διοίκηση, Apokendromeni Diikisi) headed by a general secretary appointed by the Minister of Interior .
|
secondary, regional-level self-governing entities |
51 prefectures (Νομοί, Nomi) or "nomes", headed by a popularly elected Prefect (Νομάρχης) and governed by the popularly elected Prefectural Council (Νομαρχιακό συμβούλιο). Some prefectures were grouped into larger administrative super-prefectures or "hypernomarchies"), while Attica Prefecture was further subdivided into four administrative prefectures ("nomarchies"). |
13 regions (Περιφέρεια, Periferia) or "peripheries",headed by a popularly elected Governor (περιφερειάρχης, periferiarchis) and governed by the popularly elected Regional Council (Περιφερειακό συμβούλιο, perifereiakó symvoúlio). Regions are further subdivided into regional units (περιφερειακή ενότητα, periferiaki enotita), often corresponding to the former prefectures, and headed by a vice-regional governor (αντιπεριφερειάρχης, antiperifereiárchis). |
primary, local-level self-governing entities |
914 municipalities (Δήμος, Dimos), further subdivided in:
120 communities (Κοινότητα, kinotita) |
325 municipalities (Δήμος, Dimos), further divided in:
|
Local administrative reform
Population | Municipalities | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Before 2010 | After 2011 | |||
Number | Share | Number | Share | |
up to 5,000 | 548 | 53% | 45 | 14% |
up to 10,000 | 259 | 25% | 28 | 8% |
up to 50,000 | 186 | 18% | 192 | 59% |
up to 100,000 | 31 | 3% | 49 | 15% |
> 100,000 | 10 | 1% | 13 | 4% |
Total | 1034 | 100% | 325 | 100% |
The Kallikratis Programme further reduced the number of
To improve public transparency, local authorities are now generally obliged to make public all their decisions via the internet. Furthermore, a Local Ombudsman was established to support both citizens and enterprises in coping with local administrations. New Financial Committees and Executive Committees were established to help professionalize financial accounting, and to monitor the local administrations. In communities with more than 10,000 residents, a Committee for the quality of life and a Consultation Committee is established. Aimed at improving local allocation of municipal resources, the Consultation Committee consists of representatives of local stakeholders such as businesses, trade unions, chambers and NGOs.[19]
Regional administrative reform
At the same time the programme abolished the 51 self-governing
In return, the central tasks of the national administration were transferred to seven larger, newly created "decentralized administrations" (Αποκεντρωμένη Διοίκηση, Apokendromeni Diikisi). Headed by a general secretary appointed by the
Subsequently, from
Decentralized administrations | Regions | Number of municipalities |
---|---|---|
Macedonia–Thrace | Central Macedonia | 22 |
Eastern Macedonia and Thrace | 38 | |
Epirus–Western Macedonia | Western Macedonia | 12 |
Epirus | 19 | |
Thessaly–Central Greece | Thessaly | 25 |
Central Greece | 25 | |
Peloponnese–Western Greece–Ionian Islands | Peloponnese | 26 |
Western Greece | 19 | |
Ionian Islands | 7 | |
Attica | Attica | 66 |
Aegean | North Aegean | 8 |
South Aegean | 34 | |
Crete | Crete | 24 |
Reactions
Scholarly assessments
Scholars of Southern European studies have described the Kallikratis reform as surprising, as it abolished a great number of prestigious and powerful political posts, which ahead of the looming crisis would have been regarded indispensable for keeping party clientelism alive. Bertrana and Heinelt described the Papandreou government's decision as using a singular window of opportunity to overcome long-standing resistance against reform. While in regard to the massive-scale top-down approach deviating from a Southern European strategy,[9] compared to federal states such as Germany, interaction between national and subnational levels remains relatively weak with the subnational levels remaining strictly separated from the deconcentrated administration of the central government.[23] Also, state supervision remains largely confined to a posteriori control[23] of the legality of a subnational entity's activity.[24]
Howard Elcock suggested that in spite of all efforts, officialdom's reluctance makes securing transparency a continuing struggle, so the Greek citizen remained an administré rather than a participant in government[7][page needed]. Unnecessary decimation of local community organization led, in several occasions, to further minimization of participation. In the meantime, the hasty manner through which the law came into action paralyzed local authorities' initiative and independent funding.[25]
Kallikratis and austerity
Akrivopoulou et al. pointed out that the Kallikratis program needs to be seen in the context of the general effort to create a smaller state. They point to specific provisions in the First and even more so in the Second Memorandum concerning the role of local governance for overall austerity.[26]
Nicos Souliotis pointed out that the Kallikratis plan fosters the transfer of austerity policies to the local administrations, as the devolution of responsibilities to the subnational levels has not been accompanied by the transfer of the financial resources required to fulfil the responsibilities.[27][page needed]
See also
References
- ^ "Law 3852/2010" (in Greek).
- ^ "Law 4555/2018" (in Greek).
- ^ Hlepas & Getimis (2011), p. 425 f..
- ^ Vamvakas (2012), p. 26.
- ^ Vamvakas (2012), p. 29.
- ^ Vamvakas (2012), p. 31.
- ^ ISBN 978-0-415-56927-9.
- ^ "Detailed census results 1991" (PDF) (in Greek and French). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-03.
- ^ a b Bertrana & Heinelt (2013), p. 83 f.
- ^ Hlepas & Getimis (2011), p. 427 f..
- ^ a b Hlepas (2011), p. 76
- ^ a b Hlepas (2011), p. 77
- ^ a b c d Hlepas (2011), p. 84
- ^ Hlepas & Getimis (2011), p. 431.
- ^ Hlepas & Getimis (2011), p. 425.
- ISBN 978-92-64-16689-9.
- ^ Hlepas (2013), p. 261.
- ^ a b Hlepas (2013), p. 260
- ^ Hlepas (2013), p. 267.
- ISBN 978-92-64-20140-8.
- ^ Hlepas (2013), p. 265.
- ISBN 978-1-137-02543-2.
- ^ a b Bertrana & Heinelt (2013), p. 79.
- ^ Dacoronia (2012), p. 373.
- ^ "Ανάβρα: Το θαύμα που... έσβησε". 2017-09-23.
- ^ Akrivopoulou, Dimitropoulos & Koutnatzis (2012), p. 664.
- ISBN 978-1-4462-5219-2.
Literature
- Akrivopoulou, Christina; Dimitropoulos, Georgios; Koutnatzis, Stylianos-Ioannis G. (2012). "The "Kallikratis Program"" (PDF). Istituzioni del Federalismo (3): 653–693.
- Bertrana, Xavier; Heinelt, Hubert (2013). "The Second Tier of Local Government in the Context of European Multi-Level Government Systems: Institutional Setting and Prospects for Reform" (PDF). Revista Catalana de Drét Public (46): 73–89. .
- Dacoronia, Eugenia (2012). "Greece". In J. M. Smits (ed.). Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (2nd ed.). ISBN 978-1-84980-415-8.
- Hlepas, Nikolaos-Komninos (2011). "The Impact of local government reforms in Greece: a critical overview". In Lucica Matei; Spyridon Flogaitis (eds.). Public Administration in the Balkans – from Weberian bureaucracy to New Public Management. Editura Economicǎ. pp. 67–87. ISBN 978-973-709-531-2.
- Hlepas, Nikos; Getimis, Panagiotis (2011). "Greece: Prefectures". In ISBN 978-0-19-956297-8.
- Hlepas, Nikolaos-Komninos (2013). "Local government in Greece". In Ángel Manuel Moreno (ed.). Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: A Comparative Legal Perspective. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública. pp. 257–282. ISBN 978-84-7351-417-0.
- Vamvakas, Nancy (2012). Europeanizing Greece: The Effects of Ten Years of EU Structural Funds, 1989-1999. ISBN 978-1-4426-4141-9.
External links
- ΦΕΚ A 87/2010, Full text of Law 3852/2010 (Kallikratis programme) in the Government Gazette of the Hellenic Republic
- ΦΕΚ B 1292/2010, List of primary and secondary organizations of local self-government as a result of the Kallikratis programme in the Government Gazette of the Hellenic Republic (in Greek)