Mary de Bohun

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Mary de Bohun
Countess of Northampton
Countess of Derby (by courtesy)
refer to caption
Mary as a child in the Psalter of Mary de Bohun
Bornc. 1369/70
Died4 June 1394
Peterborough Castle, Kingdom of England
Burial6 July 1394
Spouse
FatherHumphrey de Bohun, 7th Earl of Hereford
MotherJoan Fitzalan

Mary de Bohun (c. 1369/70[a] – 4 June 1394) was the first wife of Henry Bolingbroke, Earl of Northampton and Hereford and the mother of King Henry V. Mary was never queen, as she died before her husband came to the throne as Henry IV.

Early life

Mary was a daughter of

Richard FitzAlan, 10th Earl of Arundel, and Eleanor of Lancaster
.

Mary and her elder sister,

Edward III.[1] In an effort to keep the entire inheritance for himself and his wife, Thomas of Woodstock pressured the child Mary into becoming a nun.[3] In a plot with John of Gaunt, Mary's aunt took her from Thomas' castle at Pleshey back to Arundel whereupon she was married to Henry Bolingbroke, the future Henry IV.[3]

Marriage and children

Mary married Henry—then known as Bolingbroke—on 5 February 1381,[4] at Arundel Castle. It was at Monmouth Castle, one of her husband's possessions, that Mary gave birth to her first child, the future Henry V, on 16 September 1386. Her second child, Thomas, was born probably at London shortly before 25 November 1387.[5]

Her children were:[b]

Death

Mary de Bohun died at Peterborough Castle, giving birth to her daughter Philippa.[11] She was buried in the collegiate Church of the Annunciation of Our Lady of the Newarke, Leicester, on 6 July 1394.[12][13][14]

Ancestry

Notes

  1. ^ "Mary (born in 1369-70) was naturally a matter of considerable interest to Buckingham. As long as she remained single, the entire Bohun inheritance would fall to him.[1]
  2. ^ According to some sources,[6][7] in 1382 she had a son who died shortly after birth. This is incorrect, as it is based on a misreading of a contemporary account book, by J. H. Wylie, in his biography of Henry IV (published in the 19th century). Wylie missed a line which made clear that the boy in question was Mary's nephew, Humphrey, 2nd Earl of Buckingham. There is no evidence that there was any child born to Mary at this time (when she was only about 14).[5]

References

  1. ^ a b c Given-Wilson 2016, p. 26.
  2. ^ Ward 1995, p. 21.
  3. ^ a b Goodman 2013, p. 276.
  4. ^ Brown & Summerson 2010.
  5. ^ a b Mortimer 2007, p. appendix 3.
  6. ^ Ward 2006, p. 49.
  7. ^ Staley 2006, p. 229.
  8. ^ a b c d e f Allmand 1992, p. 8-9.
  9. ^ Panton 2011, p. 74.
  10. ^ Panton 2011, p. 370-371.
  11. ^ Given-Wilson 2016, p. 86.
  12. ^ Richardson 2011, p. 352.
  13. ^ Luxford 2008, p. 130.
  14. ^ Knighton 1995, p. 551.

Sources

External links