Pivotal response treatment
![]() |
Pivotal response treatment (PRT), also referred to as pivotal response training, is a naturalistic form of
History
Initial attempts to treat autism were mostly unsuccessful and in the 1960s researchers began to focus on behavioral intervention therapies. Though these interventions enjoyed a degree of success, limitations included long hours needed for thousands of trials and limited generalization to new environments. Lynn and Robert Koegel incorporated ideas from the natural language procedures to develop verbal communication in children with autism.[2] They theorized that, if effort was focused on certain pivotal responses, intervention would be more successful and efficient. As they saw it, developing these pivotal behaviors would result in widespread improvement in other areas.
Pivotal response treatment is based on a belief that autism is a much less severe disorder than originally thought.[citation needed]
Theory
Pivotal response treatment is a naturalistic intervention model derived from the principles of applied behavior analysis. Rather than target individual behaviors one at a time, PRT targets pivotal areas of a child's development such as motivation,[3] responsiveness to multiple cues,[4] self-management, and social initiations.[5] By targeting these critical areas, PRT results in widespread, collateral improvements in other social, communicative, and behavioral areas that are not specifically targeted.
The underlying motivational strategies of PRT are incorporated throughout intervention as often as possible, and they include child choice,
The two primary pivotal areas of pivotal response therapy are motivation and self-initiated activities. Three others are self-management,
Support
An article published by Koegel and colleagues in 2015[11] claims that PRT can be up to eight times more effective than standard ABA practices for reducing certain behaviors.
A meta analysis by a team of researchers from Norway published in 2020 concluded that while a statistically significant effect of PRT on expressive language skills could be seen, the "overall certainty of evidence" was of low quality and did not allow the researchers to draw "firm conclusions" about the effectiveness of PRT.[12]