Rodríguez v. Popular Democratic Party

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Rodríguez v. Popular Democratic Party of Puerto Rico
U.S. LEXIS 115; 50 U.S.L.W. 4599
Case history
PriorSuperior Court of Puerto Rico, Judgment for Popular Democratic Party
SubsequentSupreme Court of Puerto Rico, Judgment for Carlos Romero Barcelo, Governor of Puerto Rico
Holding
Whether Puerto Rico may, by statute, vest in a political party the power to fill an interim vacancy in the Puerto Rico Legislature. The Supreme Court of Puerto Rico held that such a procedure did not violate the Constitution of the United States.[1]
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Case opinion
MajorityBurger, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
U.S. Const. article I, section 2, and US Const. Amendment 17, clause 2; Art. III, § 8. Article 5.006 of the Puerto Rico Electoral Law

Rodríguez v. Popular Democratic Party, 457 U.S. 1 (1982), was a case in which the

US Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico.[2] The case was of some interest to close followers of the Court as it featured the one and only return of former associate justice, Abe Fortas
, now in private practice, at oral argument on behalf of the appellee.

Background

A member of appellee

inter alia
, that the pertinent statute, as properly construed, requires a by-election only if the party of the legislator vacating the seat fails to designate a replacement within 60 days after the vacancy occurs, and that, if the party selects a single candidate within such period, that candidate is declared "automatically elected to fill the vacancy." The court rejected appellants' contention that this procedure violated the Federal Constitution. While the case was pending before the Puerto Rico Supreme Court, appellee held a primary election in which only its members were permitted to participate, and which resulted in the selection of a person who, pursuant to the Supreme Court's mandate, was sworn in as the new representative from District 31.

See also

References

External links