User contributions for 177.9.140.87

22 June 2016

• 00:2700:27, 22 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Claims that doesn't match with references, as well as deletions which exceed the disputed sentence. More details at Talk Page!!!
• 00:1800:18, 22 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Claims that doesn't match with references, as well as deletions which exceed the disputed sentence. More details at Talk Page!!!
• 00:1200:12, 22 June 2016 diff hist +4‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 00:1000:10, 22 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Claims that doesn't match with references, as well as deletions which exceed the disputed sentence. More details at Talk Page!!!
• 00:0400:04, 22 June 2016 diff hist +3‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 00:0300:03, 22 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Claims that doesn't match with references, as well as deletions which exceed the disputed sentence. More details at Talk Page!!!
• 00:0200:02, 22 June 2016 diff hist +578‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section

21 June 2016

• 23:4823:48, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Claims that doesn't match with references, as well as deletions which exceed the disputed sentence. More details at Talk Page!!!
• 23:4423:44, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Your claims doesn't match with references, as well as your deletion exceed the disputed sentence. More details at Talk Page!!!
• 23:4123:41, 21 June 2016 diff hist +1‎ Brazilian Army ‎ typo
• 23:3923:39, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Your claims doesn't match with references, as well as your deletion exceed the disputed sentence. More details at Talk Page!!!
• 23:3923:39, 21 June 2016 diff hist −3‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 23:3823:38, 21 June 2016 diff hist +528‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 23:1823:18, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Your claims doesn't match with references, as well as your deletion exceed the disputed sentence. More details at Talk Page!!!
• 23:1523:15, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Your claims doesn't match with references, as well as your deletion exceed the disputed sentence. More details at Talk Page!!!
• 23:1223:12, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Text already neutral, your claims doesn't match with references, as well as your deletion exceed the disputed sentence. More details at Talk Page!!!
• 23:0623:06, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Text doesn't match with references, deletion exceed the disputed sentence, more details at Talk Page!!!
• 23:0523:05, 21 June 2016 diff hist +758‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 22:4822:48, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Text doesn't match with references, deletion exceed the disputed sentence, more details at Talk Page!!!
• 22:4722:47, 21 June 2016 diff hist +328‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 22:3922:39, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Text doesn't match with references, deletion exceed the disputed sentence, more details at Talk Page!!!
• 22:3522:35, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Reversion Details at Talk Page
• 22:3222:32, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Reversion Details at Talk Page
• 22:2922:29, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Reversion Details at Talk Page
• 22:2622:26, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Talk Page
• 22:2522:25, 21 June 2016 diff hist +6‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 22:2322:23, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ The Article is already Neutral and with Text that match with its references, contrary to Your claims... Talk Page!
• 22:2222:22, 21 June 2016 diff hist +44‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 22:2122:21, 21 June 2016 diff hist +282‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 22:1522:15, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ No, it haven't. Talk Page
• 22:1022:10, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Details at Talk Page
• 22:0822:08, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ AGAIN: Your text doesn't match with references, as well as the text deleted by you has no relation with it, as evidenced in Talk Page!!!
• 22:0422:04, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Reverting Recurrent vandalism at Opening section, AGAIN: Your references doesn't match with Your claims, as evidenced in Talk Page
• 22:0122:01, 21 June 2016 diff hist +6‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 21:5721:57, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Your text doesn't match with references, as evidenced in Talk Page!!!
• 21:5121:51, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Your text doesn't match with references, as evidenced in Talk Page!!!
• 21:4621:46, 21 June 2016 diff hist −313‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Reverting Recurrent vandalism at Opening section, See Talk Page
• 21:4121:41, 21 June 2016 diff hist −234‎ Brazilian Army ‎ AGAIN: Your text doesn't match with references, as evidenced in Talk Page!!!
• 21:3521:35, 21 June 2016 diff hist −234‎ Brazilian Army ‎ AGAIN: Contrary to the presente text, Your claims doesn't match with Your references, as evidenced in Talk Page!!!
• 21:3121:31, 21 June 2016 diff hist +147‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 21:2821:28, 21 June 2016 diff hist −224‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Reverting Recurrent vandalism at Opening section, AGAIN: Contrary to the presente text, Your claims doesn't match with Your references, as evidenced in Talk Page
• 21:2621:26, 21 June 2016 diff hist +284‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 21:2321:23, 21 June 2016 diff hist −224‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Reverting Recurrent vandalism at Opening section, AGAIN: Your references doesn't match with Your claims, as evidenced in Talk Page
• 21:1621:16, 21 June 2016 diff hist −224‎ Brazilian Army ‎ The references doesn't match with our claims, as evidenced in Talk Page
• 21:1221:12, 21 June 2016 diff hist −224‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Reverting Recurrent vandalism at Opening section over the years, which has no support on References, See Talk Page
• 21:1021:10, 21 June 2016 diff hist −224‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Isn't enough to say so, it must to be prooven - Talk Page
• 21:0621:06, 21 June 2016 diff hist −224‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Not really, Talk Page
• 21:0521:05, 21 June 2016 diff hist +61‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section
• 21:0321:03, 21 June 2016 diff hist −224‎ Brazilian Army ‎ Book references, Talk Page
• 21:0321:03, 21 June 2016 diff hist +376‎ Talk:Brazilian Army ‎ →‎Recurrent vandalism at Opening Section