User contributions for 178.143.40.241

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

00:2700:27, 9 May 2024 diff hist +2‎ Barium sulfate ‎ →‎Radiometric measurements current
00:1600:16, 9 May 2024 diff hist +32‎ Talk:Phosphorescence ‎ add title current
00:1600:16, 9 May 2024 diff hist +663‎ Talk:Phosphorescence ‎No edit summary Tag: New topic
00:0600:06, 9 May 2024 diff hist +153‎ Phosphorescence ‎ Undid revision 1222943785 by Zaereth (talk) The citation does not support your original research claim that this is a "completely random process". Namely, the cited source does not contain a single occurrence of the word "random" or "randomness" (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong; I only searched for the terms in my PDF viewer without reading the entire document).
Undo
00:0300:03, 9 May 2024 diff hist +53‎ Phosphorescence ‎ Undid revision 1222944295 by Zaereth (talk) Your lovely little essay fails to address the fact that Joule (or electron-volt) is not a unit of force; it is a unit of energy (or work). If the article says the hole creates a *force* which can be measured in electron-volts, that statement is factually incorrect and must be rectified. This is a matter of fact, not opinion.
Undo

21:0221:02, 2 May 2024 diff hist +146‎ Cycle detection ‎ →‎Gosper's algorithm: archive link
20:3620:36, 2 May 2024 diff hist −11‎ Cycle detection ‎ →‎Advantages: fix error in logical reasoning
20:1320:13, 2 May 2024 diff hist +756‎ Pigeonhole sort ‎ Put the example back. Examples are good. It is natural to learn from examples, we should not remove them. Let's stop making WP worse by removing good examples ok? current