User contributions for 220.255.115.209
For 220.255.115.209 talk block log logs filter log
2 November 2007
- 03:4203:42, 2 November 2007 diff hist +811 Talk:Waterboarding →Rampant Political Bias
- 03:3203:32, 2 November 2007 diff hist −515 Waterboarding You've abandoned Talk, conceded that the removed sources do not "literal[ly]" support your claim. To many, the plain English of the statute does not include waterboarding. So you're just pushing POV.
- 03:2403:24, 2 November 2007 diff hist +80 Waterboarding No one is categorically claiming that waterboarding isn't torture.NPOV means that the controversy - and not coming down on one side or the other of the controversy - should be reflected in the lede.
- 03:2103:21, 2 November 2007 diff hist −595 Waterboarding So you concede that the sources removed do not "literally" and explicitly state that w'boarding = torture. Accordingly, you shouldn't be reading your interpretation in. Stick to NPOV.
- 03:1103:11, 2 November 2007 diff hist +380 Talk:Waterboarding →EDIT WAR
- 03:0003:00, 2 November 2007 diff hist +1,077 Talk:Waterboarding →EDIT WAR
- 02:5102:51, 2 November 2007 diff hist +371 Talk:Waterboarding →EDIT WAR
- 02:4802:48, 2 November 2007 diff hist +423 Talk:Waterboarding →EDIT WAR
- 02:4302:43, 2 November 2007 diff hist −515 Waterboarding Er, no. The sources do not state that waterboarding = torture. You are citing them as if they do, and coming down on _conclusively_ on one side of the controversy. Please adhere to NPOV.
- 02:3902:39, 2 November 2007 diff hist +1,593 Talk:Waterboarding →EDIT WAR
- 02:2302:23, 2 November 2007 diff hist −515 Waterboarding There is nothing "weaselly" about NPOV unless you mean to claim that claims that w'boarding is torture = weaselly. Discuss in Talk instead of repeatedly violating NPOV.
- 02:1702:17, 2 November 2007 diff hist +331 Talk:Waterboarding →Rampant Political Bias
- 02:1402:14, 2 November 2007 diff hist +508 Talk:Waterboarding →EDIT WAR
- 02:0402:04, 2 November 2007 diff hist −549 Waterboarding Again, stick to NPOV. Larry Cohen's edit was an excellent compromise that did NOT come down conclusively on one side of the controversy.
- 01:5901:59, 2 November 2007 diff hist +905 Talk:Waterboarding No edit summary
- 01:4701:47, 2 November 2007 diff hist −521 Waterboarding Actually, the Administration does. See e.g., http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/18usc23402340a2.htm. If boarding does not result in organ failure etc., it isn't torture according to this OLC opinion.
- 01:4301:43, 2 November 2007 diff hist +454 Talk:Waterboarding →EDIT WAR
- 01:3601:36, 2 November 2007 diff hist 0 Waterboarding No edit summary
- 01:3501:35, 2 November 2007 diff hist +34 Waterboarding No edit summary
- 01:3401:34, 2 November 2007 diff hist −555 Waterboarding Actually, I am involved in Talk. What exactly is unsourced in my edit? You can't say. Again, you are coming down conclusively on one side of the controversy. Keep it NPOV please.
- 01:3001:30, 2 November 2007 diff hist +291 Talk:Waterboarding →EDIT WAR
- 01:2701:27, 2 November 2007 diff hist −555 Waterboarding Please stop reverting a perfectly good compromise. You are coming down conclusively on one side of the controversy. That is blatant POV. Stick to NPOV, thank you.
- 01:2501:25, 2 November 2007 diff hist +778 Talk:Waterboarding →EDIT WAR
- 01:1601:16, 2 November 2007 diff hist −555 Waterboarding reverted. Stick to the facts and NPOV please. You're coming down on one side dogmatically.
- 01:1301:13, 2 November 2007 diff hist +662 Talk:Waterboarding →EDIT WAR
- 01:0501:05, 2 November 2007 diff hist −555 Waterboarding Larry Cohen's edit was a fair compromise. Do stop mischaracterising the sources. "Severe" pain may or may not include waterboarding seeing as it is a borderline case (people disagree). Stick to NPOV.
1 November 2007
- 23:0723:07, 1 November 2007 diff hist −368 Waterboarding Please keep to NPOV. No editorializing, thank you.
- 23:0523:05, 1 November 2007 diff hist +9 Waterboarding fixed error
- 23:0223:02, 1 November 2007 diff hist −3 Waterboarding Please do not delete "it has been called torture" from the article. That is a fair characterisation of the sources cited.
- 23:0023:00, 1 November 2007 diff hist −595 Waterboarding Refs. 5, 6 & 7 do not define waterboarding as "torture". Rather, they define torture as "severe physical or mental pain/suffering" (and do not say whether waterboarding qualifies). Keep to NPOV pls.
31 October 2007
- 05:3705:37, 31 October 2007 diff hist +29 Foreign relations of Brunei No edit summary
- 05:3605:36, 31 October 2007 diff hist +18 Foreign relations of Brunei No edit summary