User contributions for 66.234.33.13

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

02:5802:58, 20 November 2012 diff hist −9‎ Paul Robeson ‎ →‎Spanish Civil War (1937–1939): add a few bytes...no...delete some bytes.....he was an artist.....there is no need to say activist/artistst
02:5302:53, 20 November 2012 diff hist −9‎ Paul Robeson ‎ →‎Spanish Civil War (1937–1939): delete a few bytes

03:4503:45, 28 October 2012 diff hist −70‎ Paul Robeson ‎ actually, that's all he did later in his life was remain unapologetic...............and it saves some bytes to boot
03:4003:40, 28 October 2012 diff hist +51‎ Paul Robeson ‎ persona non grata , orwellian non person, any way u slice the pie i'm getting in trouble on wikipedia, let me roll with this for now
03:3203:32, 28 October 2012 diff hist −6‎ Paul Robeson ‎ c/e
03:2903:29, 28 October 2012 diff hist +2‎ Paul Robeson ‎ c/e: still need work with : "unwavering in his distaste to the policies of the U.S. government."
03:2603:26, 28 October 2012 diff hist +3‎ Paul Robeson ‎ oops
03:2403:24, 28 October 2012 diff hist −48‎ Paul Robeson ‎ no, sorry, its way too many bytes to include that Robeson was really upset that his father suffered as a slave....it can't go in the intro...its too many bytes and its way too concrete...intro means abstract
03:2003:20, 28 October 2012 diff hist −60‎ Paul Robeson ‎ not really against the US only, was against GB and Japan also, and later Australia
03:1703:17, 28 October 2012 diff hist +34‎ Paul Robeson ‎ NOT DEBATABLE: during the the age of McCarthyism has to be in the intro, not even close to being debatable , not even close - its totally mandatory; never debate this point w me
03:1203:12, 28 October 2012 diff hist +27‎ Paul Robeson ‎ needs work: "in his distaste to the policies of the U.S. government." but ill take it for now
03:0503:05, 28 October 2012 diff hist −12‎ Paul Robeson ‎ robeson is complicated dude;
03:0003:00, 28 October 2012 diff hist +10‎ Paul Robeson ‎ us policies, us government....needs a lil rework because of multiple uses of the same phrases but its not that bad
02:4902:49, 28 October 2012 diff hist −7‎ Paul Robeson ‎ c/e
02:4502:45, 28 October 2012 diff hist +42‎ Paul Robeson ‎ needs work: he was against anti-imperialism....but this is still much better:, this needs fixing"becoming politically outspoken against the policies of the US government"......should b imperialism as existed in the US blah blah
02:4002:40, 28 October 2012 diff hist +1‎ Paul Robeson ‎ comma
02:3802:38, 28 October 2012 diff hist −22‎ Paul Robeson ‎ very difficult and very, very important sentence; let me look at this
02:3202:32, 28 October 2012 diff hist −4‎ Paul Robeson ‎ remove specific dates in intro; not important

01:4401:44, 26 October 2012 diff hist +6‎ Paul Robeson ‎ 1) provide segway between 2nd and 3rd paragraph; 2) this is way way way too wordy "in an otherwise all-white cast"...just say significant....put in specifics in the body of the article why it is "significant"...Shakespeare OUT, Othello covers it

02:4402:44, 7 September 2012 diff hist +354‎ Talk:Paul Brown ‎ →‎Failure to account for Jim Brown: new section
02:3602:36, 7 September 2012 diff hist +464‎ User talk:Sarastro1 ‎ →‎request re-review of Paul Brown article: new section
02:3202:32, 7 September 2012 diff hist +325‎ Talk:Paul Brown ‎ Last criticisms
02:2802:28, 7 September 2012 diff hist +928‎ Talk:Paul Brown ‎ →‎Criticisms: new section

02:4502:45, 27 August 2012 diff hist +5‎ Bert Bell ‎ c/e typo
00:0500:05, 27 August 2012 diff hist −176‎ Bert Bell ‎ →‎Philadelphia Eagles (1933–1939): TODO: remove citation needed, my citation supports what I wrote, but its not precise- a full and fair reading of the Blue Laws is needed