User contributions for 66.65.110.16

For 66.65.110.16 talk block log logs filter log
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

17 September 2022

16 September 2022

14 September 2022

11 September 2022

10 September 2022

20 July 2022

18 July 2022

  • 09:5809:58, 18 July 2022 diff hist −11‎ Jonas Mekas ‎ Edited awkward use of English. Research doesn’t talk. It is the interpreter of the data and/or evidence who makes a claim on the basis of their research. People who have studied basic historical methods know this. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 09:5109:51, 18 July 2022 diff hist +12‎ Jonas Mekas ‎ Revised language to be more charitable to Casper. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 09:4909:49, 18 July 2022 diff hist −400‎ Jonas Mekas ‎ Deleted irrelevant quote. What do Hoberman’s personal issues with Mekas have to do with the controversy? Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 09:4709:47, 18 July 2022 diff hist +894‎ Jonas Mekas ‎ Added back quote from Robert van Voren, which LolKafka abruptly deleted after it had been part of the controversy for many months. A controversy without opposing viewpoints is not a controversy. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 09:3609:36, 18 July 2022 diff hist +1,034‎ Talk:Jonas Mekas ‎ →‎Controversy over wartime activities: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 09:2509:25, 18 July 2022 diff hist +539‎ Jonas Mekas ‎ Reinserted reference to the recent scholarship of Saulius Sužiedėlis who is cited approvingly elsewhere in the article in other contexts. It is worth including that the leading expert on Lithuanian far-right parties and the Lithuanian Holocaust disputes Casper’s claims. It’s unfortunate that this fact inconveniences LolKafka’s efforts to libel Mekas. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 09:1909:19, 18 July 2022 diff hist +273‎ Jonas Mekas ‎ Cited source which is an interview with an emeritus scholar of the Lithuanian Holocaust (cited elsewhere in article) and a respected Lithuanian journalist. If LolKafka thinks the historian is not a valid source, why did they add another citation by the scholar in another section and why does Casper cite the scholar in his article? Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 09:1509:15, 18 July 2022 diff hist −224‎ Jonas Mekas ‎ Revised LolKafka’s change, which give undue emphasis to Casper’s claims. Editor refuses to acknowledge that a major historian of the Lithuanian Holocaust with decades more experience than Casper has questioned Casper. A totally pro-Casper bias that continuously privileges one historians views over that of a far more established scholar. Tags: references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

17 July 2022

24 May 2022

13 May 2022

4 May 2022

  • 19:0919:09, 4 May 2022 diff hist −1,004‎ Jonas Mekas ‎ Removed addition that lies at the very heart of the controversy over Mekas. LolKafka1888 is confusing the chronology of events and failing to explain key descrepencies. The LAF was forced underground by the Nazis. If that’s the case, Mekas was a member of the anti-Nazi resistance. LolKafka1888 is continuously trying to libel Jonas Mekas. Their entire argument rests on the deeply flawed research of one graduate student who has a track record of making misleading claims. Tags: references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 04:1804:18, 4 May 2022 diff hist −1,005‎ Jonas Mekas ‎ Deleted severe discrepancy. How can Jonas Mekas have worked for a newspaper published by the LAF from 1941 to 1942 if the LAF had been banned by the Nazis in September, 1941? This needs to be explained by LolKafka1888 if they are going to make this allegation. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithuanian_Activist_Front Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

3 May 2022

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/66.65.110.16"