User contributions for 71.174.135.36

13 February 2016

• 18:4018:40, 13 February 2016 diff hist +342‎ User talk:71.174.135.36 ‎ →‎February 2016
• 18:3418:34, 13 February 2016 diff hist +208‎ User talk:71.174.135.36 ‎ →‎February 2016
• 18:3218:32, 13 February 2016 diff hist +288‎ User talk:71.174.135.36 ‎ →‎If I put something on my talk page it's because I want it there: new section
• 18:2918:29, 13 February 2016 diff hist +208‎ User talk:71.174.135.36 ‎ →‎February 2016
• 18:2718:27, 13 February 2016 diff hist +287‎ User talk:71.174.135.36 ‎ →‎If I put something on my talk page it's because I want it there: new section
• 18:2518:25, 13 February 2016 diff hist +209‎ User talk:71.174.135.36 ‎ →‎February 2016
• 18:2418:24, 13 February 2016 diff hist +345‎ User talk:71.174.135.36 ‎ →‎February 2016
• 18:2218:22, 13 February 2016 diff hist +245‎ User talk:71.174.135.36 ‎ →‎February 2016
• 18:0718:07, 13 February 2016 diff hist +549‎ User talk:71.174.135.36 ‎ →‎February 2016
• 17:5617:56, 13 February 2016 diff hist +491‎ Drake equation ‎ looked at it and the cite used is from an organization not a person so self-published objection is BS
• 17:4117:41, 13 February 2016 diff hist +208‎ User talk:71.174.135.36 ‎ →‎February 2016
• 17:3217:32, 13 February 2016 diff hist +491‎ Drake equation ‎ first how do you know it is a self published website and second what policy bans its use?

12 February 2016

• 01:1401:14, 12 February 2016 diff hist +3‎ Talk:Drake equation ‎ →‎Copyrights and fair use
• 01:1101:11, 12 February 2016 diff hist +199‎ Talk:Drake equation ‎ →‎Copyrights and fair use
• 01:0801:08, 12 February 2016 diff hist +264‎ Talk:Drake equation ‎ →‎Copyrights and fair use
• 01:0601:06, 12 February 2016 diff hist +491‎ Drake equation ‎ →‎The values used for the Drake equations may be optimistic

10 February 2016

• 16:5416:54, 10 February 2016 diff hist +12‎ Talk:Drake equation ‎ →‎Copyrights and fair use
• 16:5316:53, 10 February 2016 diff hist +1‎ Talk:Drake equation ‎ →‎Copyrights and fair use
• 16:5316:53, 10 February 2016 diff hist +206‎ Talk:Drake equation ‎No edit summary
• 00:2600:26, 10 February 2016 diff hist +655‎ Talk:Drake equation ‎ →‎Re: Sun is a normal star
• 00:1900:19, 10 February 2016 diff hist +228‎ Talk:Drake equation ‎ →‎Copyrights and fair use

9 February 2016

• 23:5923:59, 9 February 2016 diff hist +452‎ Drake equation ‎ Fair use applies to EVERYBODY. It is how copyright law is exercised.
• 23:5723:57, 9 February 2016 diff hist +285‎ Talk:Drake equation ‎ →‎Copyrights and fair use: new section
• 23:5523:55, 9 February 2016 diff hist +452‎ Drake equation ‎ The fair use legal doctrine states that small portions of copyrighted works can be used. If they can'
• 23:5323:53, 9 February 2016 diff hist +199‎ Talk:Drake equation ‎ →‎Re: Sun is a normal star
• 23:4623:46, 9 February 2016 diff hist +452‎ Drake equation ‎ →‎The values used for the Drake equations may be optimistic
• 23:2323:23, 9 February 2016 diff hist +1,073‎ Drake equation ‎ No OR- read the cites - and reality is what it is
• 19:3719:37, 9 February 2016 diff hist +9‎ Drake equation ‎ →‎The values used for the Drake equations may be optimistic
• 18:3918:39, 9 February 2016 diff hist +454‎ Drake equation ‎ →‎The values used for the Drake equations may be optimistic
• 18:3918:39, 9 February 2016 diff hist +610‎ Drake equation ‎ Read the citation
• 18:2918:29, 9 February 2016 diff hist +610‎ Drake equation ‎ Tipler points out that since we haven't seen any sign of old/ancient civilizations in the galaxy there are none, or that could just be another government conspiracy
• 04:1804:18, 9 February 2016 diff hist +612‎ Talk:Drake equation ‎ →‎Current estimate of fP

6 February 2016

• 20:2320:23, 6 February 2016 diff hist +775‎ Talk:Drake equation ‎ →‎Re: Sun is a normal star: new section

3 February 2016

• 04:3404:34, 3 February 2016 diff hist +108‎ Drake equation ‎ →‎The values used for the Drake equations may be optimistic
• 04:1904:19, 3 February 2016 diff hist −1‎ Drake equation ‎ →‎The values used for the Drake equations may be optimistic
• 03:5603:56, 3 February 2016 diff hist −2‎ Drake equation ‎ →‎The values used for the Drake equations may be optimistic
• 03:5403:54, 3 February 2016 diff hist +319‎ Drake equation ‎ →‎The values used for the Drake equations may be optimistic: additional cite
• 03:5203:52, 3 February 2016 diff hist +112‎ Drake equation ‎ →‎The values used for the Drake equations may be optimistic: Adding cite
• 03:4903:49, 3 February 2016 diff hist +350‎ User talk:Isambard Kingdom ‎ →‎This is why I hate wiki editors
• 03:4003:40, 3 February 2016 diff hist +414‎ User talk:Isambard Kingdom ‎ →‎This is why I hate wiki editors
• 03:1403:14, 3 February 2016 diff hist +6,823‎ Drake equation ‎ Not copied from external source
• 03:1103:11, 3 February 2016 diff hist +6,823‎ Drake equation ‎ Lat I checked "I don't like it" is not a valid reason to delete material from a wiki article. Am I wrong?
• 03:0903:09, 3 February 2016 diff hist +349‎ User talk:71.174.135.36 ‎ →‎February 2016
• 03:0103:01, 3 February 2016 diff hist +283‎ User talk:Isambard Kingdom ‎ →‎This is why I hate wiki editors: new section
• 02:5602:56, 3 February 2016 diff hist −1‎ Fermi paradox ‎ →‎The values used for the Drake equations are inaccurate: moved a portion to improve consistency
• 02:4702:47, 3 February 2016 diff hist +6,823‎ Drake equation ‎ →‎Fermi paradox Tag: Possible vandalism
• 01:3501:35, 3 February 2016 diff hist +402‎ Fermi paradox ‎ →‎The values used for the Drake equations are optimistic
• 00:5500:55, 3 February 2016 diff hist +298‎ Talk:Fermi paradox ‎ →‎tried to add material on some factors of the Drake equation
• 00:3100:31, 3 February 2016 diff hist +4‎ Talk:Fermi paradox ‎ →‎Finding planets or finding data glitches
• 00:3100:31, 3 February 2016 diff hist +502‎ Talk:Fermi paradox ‎ →‎Finding planets or finding data glitches