User contributions for 72.223.98.118
For 72.223.98.118 talk block log logs filter log
25 November 2014
- 00:4500:45, 25 November 2014 diff hist +70 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Eric Corbett agrees to a restriction prohibiting him from...
- 00:4100:41, 25 November 2014 diff hist +267 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Eric Corbett agrees to a restriction prohibiting him from...: Proposal 2.3 is not a compromise, but a guarantee of more of these painful discussions about the same editor in the future.
24 November 2014
- 16:3916:39, 24 November 2014 diff hist +330 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Final comments: A checkuser would be OK with me.
- 15:2315:23, 24 November 2014 diff hist +522 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Final comments: After years of disruption and excuses, banning EC is the right thing to do.
- 00:0700:07, 24 November 2014 diff hist +728 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Last warning: No, what I said was...
23 November 2014
- 22:1722:17, 23 November 2014 diff hist 0 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Last warning: Apologies, JohnCD. Didn't mean to cut in front of you.
- 22:1522:15, 23 November 2014
diff hist +499
Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision
WP:VALIDALTPrivacy: A person editing an article which is highly controversial within his/her family, social or professional circle, and whose Wikipedia identity is known within that circle, or traceable to their real-world identity
- 22:0422:04, 23 November 2014 diff hist +499 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Avoid banning Eric: Counter to "Consequences of personal attacks."
- 21:4621:46, 23 November 2014 diff hist +530 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Last warning: "Yes," in this case, is tricksy.
- 21:3521:35, 23 November 2014 diff hist +214 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Last warning: Not an involved party.
- 21:3221:32, 23 November 2014 diff hist +667 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Avoid banning Eric: No.
- 21:1921:19, 23 November 2014 diff hist +1,249 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Last warning: that would still leave room for more of the same
- 02:5502:55, 23 November 2014 diff hist +241 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →"Normal dispute resolution on such matters" and "appropriate channels"
- 02:3102:31, 23 November 2014 diff hist +510 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Unanswered concern: new section
19 November 2014
- 08:0408:04, 19 November 2014 diff hist +201 Wikipedia talk:Civility →Survey: Support
- 07:3607:36, 19 November 2014 diff hist +185 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Neotarf again: question
- 07:2507:25, 19 November 2014 diff hist +1,064 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Unfit for purpose?: he now says he's "willing" but...
- 05:0405:04, 19 November 2014 diff hist +280 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Robert McClenon: tired of references to "cultural imperialism" and "kumbayah singers"
- 05:0005:00, 19 November 2014 diff hist +174 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Robert McClenon: which?
- 04:5604:56, 19 November 2014 diff hist +412 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Robert McClenon: No Lightbreather, Neotarf, and Carolmooredc in Banning Policy case
17 November 2014
- 19:1419:14, 17 November 2014 diff hist +10 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →{{anchor|Troublesome priests}}Turbulent priests
- 19:1219:12, 17 November 2014 diff hist +1,306 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →{{anchor|Troublesome priests}}Turbulent priests: diffs and perspective
- 17:5617:56, 17 November 2014 diff hist +325 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention/Gender gap Bottom of page link, just in case.
- 03:4303:43, 17 November 2014 diff hist +166 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention →Symbolic change: no women?
15 November 2014
- 03:5003:50, 15 November 2014 diff hist +257 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Ping drafting arbitrators: "like a parrot" isn't nice
- 02:3602:36, 15 November 2014 diff hist +93 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention →Thoughts on editor retention and women
- 02:3102:31, 15 November 2014 diff hist +247 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention →Thoughts on editor retention and women
- 02:1202:12, 15 November 2014 diff hist +1 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention →Thoughts on editor retention and women
- 02:1002:10, 15 November 2014 diff hist +223 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention →Thoughts on editor retention and women
- 02:0302:03, 15 November 2014 diff hist +120 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention →Thoughts on editor retention and women
- 01:5501:55, 15 November 2014 diff hist +50 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention →Thoughts on editor retention and women
- 01:5001:50, 15 November 2014 diff hist +1,318 Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention →Thoughts on editor retention and women: it's not "all men" and "all women"; and the (generally) male way is not "the norm" and the (generally) female way is not "weak" or "inferior"
- 01:0201:02, 15 November 2014 diff hist +63 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Ping drafting arbitrators
14 November 2014
- 23:5523:55, 14 November 2014 diff hist +1,275 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →All I wanted was the actual word to be added to the record: Regarding Sitush's use of "dramatic"
- 21:0221:02, 14 November 2014 diff hist +35 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Behavior during a case may be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision
- 21:0121:01, 14 November 2014 diff hist +199 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Ping drafting arbitrators: What Writegeist says.
- 20:5920:59, 14 November 2014 diff hist +150 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Behavior during a case may be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision: What Capeo says.
- 19:2319:23, 14 November 2014 diff hist +10 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →All I wanted was the actual word to be added to the record: m
- 19:1619:16, 14 November 2014 diff hist +718 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →All I wanted was the actual word to be added to the record: drama queens, the vapors, hissy fits, hysterics, and so on
- 19:0219:02, 14 November 2014 diff hist +1,002 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Ping drafting arbitrators: new section
- 18:5918:59, 14 November 2014 diff hist +6 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Propose banning Sitush
- 18:5718:57, 14 November 2014 diff hist +65 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Two requests about the gender gap topic bans
- 18:3218:32, 14 November 2014 diff hist +475 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Behavior during a case may be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision: appropriate contributions, good points
- 18:1018:10, 14 November 2014 diff hist +744 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Cunt, tosser wanker etc: then, again
- 16:0216:02, 14 November 2014 diff hist +1,098 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →This edit of Eric's from today strikes me as deserving a block: Behavior during the case counts, too.
- 02:2102:21, 14 November 2014 diff hist +557 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Two requests about the gender gap topic bans: "The sooner the misconceived 'Task Force' ... is disbanded, the sooner harmony will be restored" are not collaborative words.
- 01:4701:47, 14 November 2014 diff hist +488 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Eric's Proposed Remedies: equally disruptive, in different ways
- 01:3901:39, 14 November 2014 diff hist +264 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →Carol and Neotarf: agree with SlimVirgin
- 01:3501:35, 14 November 2014 diff hist +374 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →All I wanted was the actual word to be added to the record: in fact
- 01:2901:29, 14 November 2014 diff hist +356 Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision →What is "that word"?: yes, give "the word"