User contributions for 75.132.95.79

22 September 2007

• 15:3215:32, 22 September 2007 diff hist +241‎ Women in Christianity ‎ added prophetical text concerning jezebel from revelation
• 15:1515:15, 22 September 2007 diff hist +210‎ Women in Christianity ‎ →‎Characteristics of a Godly woman: added more content
• 14:5714:57, 22 September 2007 diff hist +4‎ Women in Christianity ‎ →‎Characteristics of a Godly woman: added kjv
• 14:5614:56, 22 September 2007 diff hist +348‎ Women in Christianity ‎ →‎Characteristics of a Godly woman: more content
• 14:4414:44, 22 September 2007 diff hist +124‎ Women in Christianity ‎ more content to godly women
• 14:3714:37, 22 September 2007 diff hist +810‎ Women in Christianity ‎ added content to-characteristics of a godly woman
• 13:5513:55, 22 September 2007 diff hist −3,987‎ Women in Christianity ‎ one edit at a time please,if you want to revert something, examine the reason for each edit. example: "womens influence in the home" this is a web page and no author named go read wiki,reliable source
• 04:0704:07, 22 September 2007 diff hist +442‎ Talk:Women in Christianity ‎ comment on certain editors agenda
• 03:5203:52, 22 September 2007 diff hist +77‎ Talk:Women in Christianity ‎ status of article as of time and date
• 03:4503:45, 22 September 2007 diff hist −70‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed citation that does not even mention the author. it is certainly original research......Good Bye......CLICK
• 03:0003:00, 22 September 2007 diff hist +327‎ Women in Christianity ‎ was eve created in the image of God?
• 02:4102:41, 22 September 2007 diff hist −3,765‎ Women in Christianity ‎ document your disagreement on a edit by edit basis afaprof is the one who did the mass editing. one click and 21 edits vanished. every edit i make is documented.

21 September 2007

• 22:5722:57, 21 September 2007 diff hist +1,396‎ Talk:Bosnians ‎ no trolling here prijatelu just my observation. that is why it is on talk page and not on main article. wikipedia also says you are not to remove editors comments from talk...cao glup
• 22:4422:44, 21 September 2007 diff hist +19‎ Women in Christianity ‎ added strongs number 831 which is a more reliable trusted source than kroeger who is an extremist. the reader can study the matter and come to their own conclusion...Good Bye Kroeger.....CLICK
• 22:3622:36, 21 September 2007 diff hist −325‎ Women in Christianity ‎ the word authentein means by main stream interpreters "to dominate" kroeger according to her biography entered seminary to rebutt male heirarchy. she is an extremist and against wikipedia policy.
• 17:5517:55, 21 September 2007 diff hist −62‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed ref 21, original research, source not credible............Good Bye.....CLICK
• 17:5217:52, 21 September 2007 diff hist −496‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed the "many scholars" this is a weasel word and the text is uncited by a reliable source and is expository...Good Bye......CLICK
• 17:4917:49, 21 September 2007 diff hist −185‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed editorializing and speculation about a text of scripture....Good Bye.....CLICK
• 17:4817:48, 21 September 2007 diff hist −105‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed editorializing of kroegers interpretation of the word authentein
• 17:4517:45, 21 September 2007 diff hist +2‎ Women in Christianity ‎ replaced recent scholarship with catherine c kroeger
• 17:3217:32, 21 September 2007 diff hist −318‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed as extremist source per wikipedia see; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources
• 17:3017:30, 21 September 2007 diff hist −318‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed as extremist source see wikipedia; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources
• 15:4215:42, 21 September 2007 diff hist −245‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed "editorialization of the fourth view. ...criticised by whom? .....Now its gone......CLICK
• 15:3915:39, 21 September 2007 diff hist −89‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed editorializing concerning the roman churches position in contrast to western civilization
• 15:2115:21, 21 September 2007 diff hist 0‎ Women in Christianity ‎ neutrality tag
• 15:2015:20, 21 September 2007 diff hist +8‎ Women in Christianity ‎ added neutrality tag
• 14:5114:51, 21 September 2007 diff hist −102‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed "interpreters" and the adams rib arguement
• 14:4314:43, 21 September 2007 diff hist −62‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed reference to junias there is no scholarly consensus that this name is masculine or feminine.
• 14:3114:31, 21 September 2007 diff hist −555‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed exposition of the cited text.
• 14:2114:21, 21 September 2007 diff hist −798‎ Women in Christianity ‎ removed original research per wp:sps the "christian think tank" is one mans original research. .....CLICK
• 13:5913:59, 21 September 2007 diff hist −57‎ Women in Christianity ‎ Why would anyone use a message board as a citation.....???? It's now gone......CLICK
• 05:2805:28, 21 September 2007 diff hist +416‎ User talk:ZorgBuford5858 ‎ article; christian views about women will always remain corrupt
• 05:1905:19, 21 September 2007 diff hist +223‎ Talk:Women in Christianity ‎ added link to editors talk page for review
• 04:5404:54, 21 September 2007 diff hist +71‎ Talk:Women in Christianity ‎ reply
• 04:4704:47, 21 September 2007 diff hist +900‎ Talk:Women in Christianity ‎ reply to Cme Gbm
• 04:3404:34, 21 September 2007 diff hist +834‎ Talk:Women in Christianity ‎ reply to CME GBM
• 04:1704:17, 21 September 2007 diff hist +3‎ Women in Christianity ‎ added spacing
• 04:1504:15, 21 September 2007 diff hist 0‎ Women in Christianity ‎ changed the word one to the word the........Satan, this is not the place to insert the JEPD theory
• 04:0904:09, 21 September 2007 diff hist −80‎ Women in Christianity ‎ This "house of Israel" interpretation is theology 101
• 02:5702:57, 21 September 2007 diff hist −368‎ Women in Christianity ‎ deleted text that was exposition and pov of the editor
• 02:4802:48, 21 September 2007 diff hist +229‎ Talk:Women in Christianity ‎ →‎The entire section about Jesus interactions with women needs to be removed
• 02:4502:45, 21 September 2007 diff hist +59‎ Women in Christianity ‎ afapro removed an entire heading citing "corrected spelling punctuation errors"....?????
• 02:3402:34, 21 September 2007 diff hist −435‎ Women in Christianity ‎ editors cannot reach consensus on the definition of prostatis...readers will be directed to thayers and strongs and allow the reader conclude for themselves the definition

19 September 2007

• 14:2814:28, 19 September 2007 diff hist +1,787‎ Talk:Women in Christianity ‎ added heading and will address several contentious issues with other editors.
• 13:2713:27, 19 September 2007 diff hist −85‎ Women in Christianity ‎ the greek word could very well mean what you say. but the context will not allow for it. ..paul said, and of myself also....your rendering imlies that she presided over paul.???
• 02:0302:03, 19 September 2007 diff hist +1,396‎ Talk:Bosnians ‎ dont undue unless you have an explanation

18 September 2007

• 23:4723:47, 18 September 2007 diff hist +1‎ Women in Christianity ‎ attempted to add a space between complementarian and block = history
• 23:1523:15, 18 September 2007 diff hist +290‎ Women in Christianity ‎ marriage separation divorce remarriage
• 22:2422:24, 18 September 2007 diff hist +3‎ Women in Christianity ‎ added the word is
• 22:2222:22, 18 September 2007 diff hist +11‎ Women in Christianity ‎ changed the phrase "pauls letters" plural which implies multiple mentions to ..once in one of pauls letters