User contributions for 75.159.18.67

24 May 2009

• 07:2507:25, 24 May 2009 diff hist +3‎ Gothic metal ‎No edit summary
• 05:4805:48, 24 May 2009 diff hist −23‎ Virgin Black ‎ sorry but no
• 03:5603:56, 24 May 2009 diff hist −45‎ Technical death metal ‎
  Undid revision 291169638 by Zlogdan (talk
  ) source does not state death is a tech death band

23 May 2009

• 19:2819:28, 23 May 2009 diff hist +258‎ User talk:A Sniper ‎No edit summary
• 19:2519:25, 23 May 2009 diff hist +101‎ Death (metal band) ‎ If neither source says they are tech death, then they can't be used to prove this statement. Atleast read your own sources
• 19:2419:24, 23 May 2009 diff hist +501‎ Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ‎No edit summary
• 19:1619:16, 23 May 2009 diff hist −48‎ Death (metal band) ‎ Fraid not. See
  WP:R
  . If Metal observer is not a reliable site, BNR sure as hell isn't. But just to be sure I'm going to put it on the notice board and see what others think Tag: references removed
• 02:2802:28, 23 May 2009 diff hist +101‎ Death (metal band) ‎ Not my pov, both wikipedia policy and common sence dictate that you cannot support a statement with a source that didn't back up your claims
• 02:1902:19, 23 May 2009 diff hist −48‎ Death (metal band) ‎ Not good source, one guy does not make reliable Tag: references removed

22 May 2009

• 21:2521:25, 22 May 2009 diff hist +101‎ Death (metal band) ‎ Sources do not bak up the stements made in this article, ie. sources do not state that death is a technical death metal band, so they cannot be used to prove that they are a member of said genre