User contributions for Fetrekkie
A user with 62 edits. Account created on 20 November 2009.
5 January 2012
- 14:3014:30, 5 January 2012 diff hist +659 m Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Added in links to earlier Wikipedia Discussion pages for easy access by new readers
17 October 2010
- 15:2315:23, 17 October 2010 diff hist +1,818 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer No edit summary
16 October 2010
- 19:1419:14, 16 October 2010 diff hist +760 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer →October 16, 2010
- 18:2418:24, 16 October 2010 diff hist +339 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer →October 16, 2010
- 18:1118:11, 16 October 2010 diff hist +96 Jacobsen v. Katzer →External links
- 17:3917:39, 16 October 2010 diff hist +97 Jacobsen v. Katzer →External links
- 16:5116:51, 16 October 2010 diff hist +96 Jacobsen v. Katzer →External links
- 16:4216:42, 16 October 2010 diff hist +3 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Grammar correction
- 16:3316:33, 16 October 2010 diff hist +2 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer No edit summary
- 16:3116:31, 16 October 2010 diff hist +241 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Grammar & punctuation changes
- 14:4714:47, 16 October 2010 diff hist +50,464 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer The final Original September 27, 2010 article as contributed to by all of us over the years.
6 October 2010
- 06:0006:00, 6 October 2010 diff hist +826 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Response to VQuakr's comment.
- 04:2204:22, 6 October 2010 diff hist +4,210 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Additional input in response to DGG's actions. Removed Discussion headers as the discussion is not in disput. The Discussion Section is for discussion.
30 August 2010
- 16:4816:48, 30 August 2010 diff hist +342 Dalvik (software) It appears this was removed by mistake. We re-inserted the "copyright" court decision referenced by a blog comment input of CAFC 2008-1001 (Federal Circuit of Appeals, Washington, DC)
27 August 2010
- 12:2712:27, 27 August 2010 diff hist +343 Dalvik (software) Additional information with possible implication from a recent CAFC Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruling
7 June 2010
- 18:2518:25, 7 June 2010 diff hist +1,790 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Overview section recommendation to be posted: Combination of input from individuals
- 18:0518:05, 7 June 2010 diff hist +52 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer →Wiki Article "Work in Process": new section
4 June 2010
- 19:5119:51, 4 June 2010 diff hist +1,217 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Overview Section: Input requested
3 June 2010
- 11:5411:54, 3 June 2010 diff hist +808 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Comments to 136.152.155.19
- 11:4011:40, 3 June 2010 diff hist +5,844 Jacobsen v. Katzer Undid insertion as no agreement exists; Overview section followed by background is to be addressed first with subsequent sections following. Wiki article should not be touched during this process.
1 June 2010
- 16:4316:43, 1 June 2010 diff hist +5,324 Jacobsen v. Katzer Reinserted original Wiki Section with footnotes. (Undid Htsimson's revision because FEtrekkie and Htsimson didn't reach agreement).
- 16:0916:09, 1 June 2010 diff hist +519 Jacobsen v. Katzer Reinserted original Wiki Article Section BECAUSE we haven't agreed to that section's restructuring. See FEtrekkie's discussion (talk page)
- 15:5415:54, 1 June 2010 diff hist +1,741 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Input as to how to proceed with Wiki article. Affirming undoing Htsimson's changes to Wiki article
29 May 2010
- 11:0311:03, 29 May 2010 diff hist +142 Jacobsen v. Katzer Inserted "POV-Check" into each section to be reviewed, both by FEtrekkie and Htsimson. See May 29th Discussion section for FEtrekkie's comments.
- 10:5610:56, 29 May 2010 diff hist +649 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Input to Htsimson regarding Wiki article
20 May 2010
- 02:5802:58, 20 May 2010 diff hist +39 Jacobsen v. Katzer Inserted POV-Check
- 02:5402:54, 20 May 2010 diff hist +994 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Comments to Hstimson regarding POV-Check
17 May 2010
- 14:3014:30, 17 May 2010 diff hist −62 Jacobsen v. Katzer Removed POV insertion: See 17 May 2010 comments by FEtrekkie on Discussion Page
- 14:2814:28, 17 May 2010 diff hist +737 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Responding to 99.101.191.131 comments. Basis for removal of POV posting explained. Article left as written 16 May 2010 with exception of one reference added to background segment.
- 14:0614:06, 17 May 2010 diff hist +258 Jacobsen v. Katzer Added additional reference regarding JMRI business status; MRIA May 2005 Reporter Newsletter denoting JMRI as a new business member.
15 May 2010
- 12:5212:52, 15 May 2010 diff hist +293 Jacobsen v. Katzer Reinserted "Further Reading" section as Court Document 338 provides a very good impartial overview of the JvK case. Minor corrections (spelling, dates, clarifications,etc), removed POV heading
13 May 2010
- 12:0212:02, 13 May 2010 diff hist +402 Jacobsen v. Katzer Undid revision 361425325 by 99.101.199.131 (talk)Reason: Document 338 (Order Denying Foreign Discovery) was added to the “Further
9 May 2010
- 14:3414:34, 9 May 2010 diff hist +343 Jacobsen v. Katzer Removed the use of the word "ocassionally" as this indicates an unsupported opinion.
7 May 2010
- 19:4819:48, 7 May 2010 diff hist +17 Jacobsen v. Katzer Insertion of page number for Court Document 373
- 19:4719:47, 7 May 2010 diff hist +353 Jacobsen v. Katzer Court Document 373, page 22 shows Jacobsen was a business. Recommend Hstimson take the time to carefully read the documents before changing the article.
4 May 2010
- 16:1016:10, 4 May 2010 diff hist −54 Jacobsen v. Katzer Removed POV now that Hstimson and others have provided input over an extended period of time without changing materially the substance of the article.
- 16:0816:08, 4 May 2010 diff hist −72 Jacobsen v. Katzer Removed POV now that Hstimson and others have provided input over an extended period of time without changing materially the substance of the article.
- 15:5915:59, 4 May 2010 diff hist +544 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Input to Hstimson's comment
- 15:5715:57, 4 May 2010 diff hist +242 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Input to Hstimson's comment
24 April 2010
- 15:0115:01, 24 April 2010 diff hist +1,596 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Input to Hartboy, Npdoty and Vhkane
6 April 2010
- 20:2720:27, 6 April 2010 diff hist +2,330 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer →Point of view dispute: Additional comments to Hartboy
- 15:2215:22, 6 April 2010 diff hist +950 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer →Point of view dispute: Additional comments
5 April 2010
- 09:5909:59, 5 April 2010 diff hist −62 m Jacobsen v. Katzer Cleaned up the movement from the top of the page to the Patent Section; POV
- 09:5609:56, 5 April 2010 diff hist +2,235 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer →Point of view dispute: Addition of our comments from research into the JVK case.
- 09:0609:06, 5 April 2010 diff hist +16 m Jacobsen v. Katzer Moved POV to the specific section in disupute: The Patent Section (See discussion section)
17 March 2010
- 00:2000:20, 17 March 2010 diff hist −16 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Rearranged "Recent Revision" Comments so "most current input" is at the top of the section
- 00:1300:13, 17 March 2010 diff hist −1,132 Jacobsen v. Katzer Replaced original introduction with factual overview. Reason: original introduction is a repeat (duplicate) of various sections within the body of the Wikipedia article.
16 March 2010
- 13:5013:50, 16 March 2010 diff hist +776 Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer Open comments to Freepen and 22.73.27.92; thanking these individuals for their input.
- 13:2913:29, 16 March 2010 diff hist +148 Jacobsen v. Katzer Refinement/correction of recent modifications;(1) Insertion for paragraph space, (2) Refinement of patent statement, (3) Refinement of Anti-Slapp statement, (4) ( )'s for release definition
14 March 2010
- 02:0702:07, 14 March 2010 diff hist −188 m Jacobsen v. Katzer Removed footnote #24 referring to trainpriority's web site per comment made on discussion page by "Anonymous".
