User contributions for 99.101.199.131

3 June 2010

• 06:0406:04, 3 June 2010 diff hist −11,119‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Revert vandalism, defined as repeated changes in violation of dispute policy

1 June 2010

• 22:5022:50, 1 June 2010 diff hist −5,844‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Restore edit of patent section that achieved concensus, without objection as to fact, bias or other content issue, on talk page
• 22:4322:43, 1 June 2010 diff hist +1,228‎ Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Reply to FEtrekkie

31 May 2010

• 02:2702:27, 31 May 2010 diff hist +1,163‎ Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Reply to 64.134.147.62's arguments about the facts

29 May 2010

• 20:0720:07, 29 May 2010 diff hist +5,006‎ Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Add references to draft patent section; comment on next steps

24 May 2010

• 06:3406:34, 24 May 2010 diff hist +708‎ Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Comments on proposed settlement discussion bullet point in patent section

20 May 2010

• 14:1814:18, 20 May 2010 diff hist +64‎ Battenberg Cup ‎ cite for Enterprise 2007
• 14:1614:16, 20 May 2010 diff hist +64‎ Battenberg Cup ‎ add cite for kearsage 2008
• 14:1514:15, 20 May 2010 diff hist +64‎ Battenberg Cup ‎ add citation for Ike 2006
• 01:1201:12, 20 May 2010 diff hist +29‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Mark copyright section as disputed, see talk page and most recent edit by WonkaWonka
• 01:1001:10, 20 May 2010 diff hist +1,004‎ Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ coment on dispute, tags and recent commits

17 May 2010

• 09:0609:06, 17 May 2010 diff hist −29‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Restore POV-section dispute tag, removed earlier today without any explanation. Unilateral removal of POV dispute tags is against Wikipedia policy
• 09:0309:03, 17 May 2010 diff hist +96‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Restore POV dispute, removed earlier today without any explanation. Unilateral removal of POV dispute tags is against Wikipedia policy

16 May 2010

• 17:3417:34, 16 May 2010 diff hist +65‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Katzer-Britton agreement can be cited because its public. Since FreePen wants terms in this paragraph, discussion of why agreement is available is appropriate balance.
• 17:2917:29, 16 May 2010 diff hist +3‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Correct timeline, site source for how Katzer's misuse of decoderpro.com was first noticed; asymmetry between two "infringe" sections was opinion, treat them both the same
• 17:1917:19, 16 May 2010 diff hist −23‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ 2nd edit to remove other half 14:24, 16 May 2010 edit by "FreePen"; no citation for his "fact" re Britton as developer
• 17:1017:10, 16 May 2010 diff hist −23‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ remove 14:24, 16 May 2010 edit by "FreePen"; no citation for his "fact" that Britton was a JMRI developer; Britton not on developer list

15 May 2010

• 15:1915:19, 15 May 2010 diff hist −293‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Undid revision 362255868 by Fetrekkie (talk); POV still disputed; changing tags not 'minor'; rest is opinion
• 04:2804:28, 15 May 2010 diff hist −100‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ removed opinion about purpose of terms; even if person who keeps editing it in has first hand knowledge, WikiPedia is an encyclopedia, not place to make statements
• 04:2504:25, 15 May 2010 diff hist +125‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Add parallel construction on trademark usage
• 04:2204:22, 15 May 2010 diff hist −402‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Primary documents without context or referent are against WikiPedia policy; WikiPedia is not a collection of links Tag: section blanking
• 04:2104:21, 15 May 2010 diff hist −1‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ remove minor typo (where did the "minor edit" box go?
• 04:2004:20, 15 May 2010 diff hist −345‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Fix broken reference URLs (you wouldn't do that intentionally, would you WonkaWonka?), use common reference form.
• 04:1704:17, 15 May 2010 diff hist +106‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Restore fact that Katzer filed agreement publicly, along with previously removed citation. Fact follows from mention in previous sentence of confidentiality, added by Katzer
• 04:1404:14, 15 May 2010 diff hist +2‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Fix paragraph break
• 04:1304:13, 15 May 2010 diff hist −37‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Removed ", which he never requested by Britton" (nice grammar, Matt!); not evidenced, no concensus shown
• 04:1204:12, 15 May 2010 diff hist −507‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Removed original research: characterization of comment in primary document; no other characterization referenced
• 04:0304:03, 15 May 2010 diff hist −38‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Remove statement that Britton was JMRI "develper" (nice spelling, Matt), no evidence provided, violates original research policy

14 May 2010

• 22:4722:47, 14 May 2010 diff hist +660‎ Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Point out user Wonkawonka is just a rename of Fetrekkie account. Really, you have to do better than that to bypass community editing.
• 22:3922:39, 14 May 2010 diff hist +2‎ Talk:Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Put back correct "to" and "from" in comment, as taken from change history

11 May 2010

• 06:2006:20, 11 May 2010 diff hist −402‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Remove for 2nd time misleading link, reinserted 19:47, 7 May 2010 by Fetrekkie without comment. If you want it back, justify it. Tag: section blanking
• 06:1506:15, 11 May 2010 diff hist +456‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Correct statement and sequence of copyright arguemnts.
• 06:0206:02, 11 May 2010 diff hist 0‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Correct misspelling typical of Katzer's style

9 May 2010

• 18:3318:33, 9 May 2010 diff hist 0‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Correct mistatement of date to agree with cited document, and make it clear that event predated Katzer's reaction to it
• 18:2018:20, 9 May 2010 diff hist −122‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Removed "based upon" as opinion; the reference given on that sentence provides no support for it

8 May 2010

• 08:1408:14, 8 May 2010 diff hist +130‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Improve characterization of open source development, provide reference; misunderstanding of FOSS methods seems present throughout entry
• 08:0208:02, 8 May 2010 diff hist +32‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Restore proper quote from Court's ruling that had been removed without comment or justification by Fretrekkie
• 07:5507:55, 8 May 2010 diff hist −294‎ Jacobsen v. Katzer ‎ Restore undo by anon IP 184.76.40.253|184.76.40.253; only reason given was "opinion", without citation; original edit described facts in evidence