User contributions for Great floors

A user with 872 edits. Account created on 2 March 2016.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

19 August 2019

15 August 2019

  • 08:1408:14, 15 August 2019 diff hist −89 TG LurganI came to add Jenny Ní Ruiséil's name - since she's in a lot of the songs - but also tried to put things in order, the article shouldn't be a collection of lists-as-paragraphs

14 August 2019

  • 19:4619:46, 14 August 2019 diff hist +399 User talk:Great floors→‎JP colours: Interesting. I admit, I hadn't thought of colour-blind people. And you'll have to take my word that if you could see the colours, they're awful :-) So we just have to find two colours that are distinguished by something other than hue, e.g. light orange and dark orange. I'll give this a try. ~~~~

4 August 2019

10 June 2019

3 June 2019

2 June 2019

  • 00:1200:12, 2 June 2019 diff hist −356 LibreOfficeremove disputed tag, I've given a link to the licence and the source on the Talk page, please point to something libreoffice is doing, not just an unsourced comment from another wiki
  • 00:0600:06, 2 June 2019 diff hist +1,270 Talk:LibreOffice→‎Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Runtime Libraries: here is the licence: * https://www.libreoffice.org/about-us/licenses/ No mention of Microsoft, runtime or similar. And here's the source code: * https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice I'm no expert, but at first glance I don't see Microsoft files in there. I found some old discussions via google. One says it's not a problem, the necessary files are redistributable, and a second person closed the q

1 June 2019

31 May 2019

1 May 2019

24 April 2019

23 April 2019

  • 23:3323:33, 23 April 2019 diff hist +3 m Talk:Ronda Rousey→‎archiving: add extra indent because a graphic made my comment looked like part of the above
  • 23:3223:32, 23 April 2019 diff hist +492 Talk:Ronda Rousey→‎Archiving: But now no one sees the discussions that explain why the page is the way it is. ::Archiving ''some'' threads when a discussion page gets ''huge'' is sometimes a good idea, but deleting everything from here and putting it into a page that no one looks at is going to cause mistakes to be repeated and it shows a lack of respect for the time that participants put into writing the discussions. ~~~~

15 April 2019

11 April 2019

4 April 2019

3 April 2019

31 March 2019

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)