User contributions for Hsynylmztr
A user with 98 edits. Account created on 24 May 2021.
7 March 2022
- 18:2118:21, 7 March 2022 diff hist +462 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →WP:NORACISTS by Kurdo890
- 17:2717:27, 7 March 2022
diff hist +31
Yılmaz Güney
Undid revision 1074657222 by FDW777 (talk)
UndoReverted
- 17:1717:17, 7 March 2022 diff hist −53 m User talk:Kurdo890 →March 2022: correction current
- 17:1417:14, 7 March 2022 diff hist +188 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →WP:NORACISTS by Kurdo890: new section
- 17:1417:14, 7 March 2022 diff hist +662 User talk:Kurdo890 →March 2022: new section
- 12:2312:23, 7 March 2022 diff hist +302 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →WP:NOTHERE by Hsynylmztr
- 12:0612:06, 7 March 2022 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:Hsynylmztr (Result: )
- 12:0512:05, 7 March 2022 diff hist +241 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:Hsynylmztr (Result: )
- 12:0012:00, 7 March 2022 diff hist −1,360 User talk:Hsynylmztr "Sən Avşar istə yenidən orduna qatılaq" -Afshar Turkomans to Nader Shah when he ascended to the throne Tag: Manual revert
- 11:4711:47, 7 March 2022 diff hist +603 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:Hsynylmztr (Result: )
- 11:3911:39, 7 March 2022 diff hist +1,677 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}} (Result: ): new section
- 11:3811:38, 7 March 2022 diff hist +524 User talk:HistoryofIran →March 2022: new section Tag: Reverted
- 10:4910:49, 7 March 2022 diff hist +1,351 User talk:HistoryofIran →March 2022: new section Tag: Reverted
- 10:4410:44, 7 March 2022 diff hist +493 Talk:Nader Shah →Origins of the Afsharid dynasty
6 March 2022
- 09:1509:15, 6 March 2022
diff hist +662 m
Nader Shah
Undid revision 1073918210 by HistoryofIran (talk)
UndoReverted
- 09:1409:14, 6 March 2022 diff hist +494 Talk:Nader Shah →Origins of the Afsharid dynasty
25 February 2022
- 11:4411:44, 25 February 2022 diff hist +986 Talk:Nader Shah →Origins of the Afsharid dynasty
- 11:2211:22, 25 February 2022 diff hist +769 User talk:HistoryofIran →Nadir Shah's Turkic identity: new section Tag: Reverted
- 07:0407:04, 25 February 2022
diff hist +662
Nader Shah
Undid revision 1073811255 by HistoryofIran (talk) Please check the talk page. This was about the origins of the Afsharid dynasty, not personal to Nadir Shah. Source clearly mentiones the Turkoman origins, Napoleons and Italians are not a right comparison since Afsharids are literally an Oghuz tribe and entire Oghuz group migrated to what is now Iran together with their monarchs.
UndoReverted
- 07:0307:03, 25 February 2022 diff hist +486 Talk:Nader Shah →Origins of the Afsharid dynasty: new section
- 06:4006:40, 25 February 2022 diff hist +98 Charge (warfare) Since you ignored my answer on the talk page and other users also disagree with you, I restore the old version with your corrections included. Please bring a citation if you want to use these exact words. If you were not going to discuss, why did you open a talk section with my name as a title?
- 06:3906:39, 25 February 2022 diff hist +221 Talk:Charge (warfare) →Vandalism by {{u|Hsynylmztr}}
- 06:1606:16, 25 February 2022 diff hist +861 Talk:Seljuk Empire →Issue with Turko Persian label
24 February 2022
- 19:5319:53, 24 February 2022 diff hist +290 Talk:Seljuk Empire →Issue with Turko Persian label
- 16:5616:56, 24 February 2022 diff hist +662 Nader Shah Detail about the origins of the Afsharid dynasty Tag: Reverted
- 10:4610:46, 24 February 2022 diff hist +16 Talk:Charge (warfare) →Vandalism by {{u|Hsynylmztr}}
- 10:4510:45, 24 February 2022 diff hist +3,051 Talk:Charge (warfare) →Vandalism by {{u|Hsynylmztr}}
23 February 2022
- 05:5105:51, 23 February 2022 diff hist +259 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase Requesting protection for Charge (warfare)
- 05:4605:46, 23 February 2022
diff hist +108
Charge (warfare)
Undid revision 1073416588 by LaHire07 (talk) Why did you change it again without reaching a consensus? You were warned on the talk page for edit warring. Please bring a source with a quotation, then edit. Please don't talk personally with me.
UndoReverted
22 February 2022
- 10:0010:00, 22 February 2022 diff hist +2,950 Talk:Battle of Poitiers →LaHire07's edits
21 February 2022
- 17:3717:37, 21 February 2022
diff hist +108
Charge (warfare)
Undid revision 1073223014 by LaHire07 (talk) Your edit doesn't have any source. Anyone who read these logs can see who is acting childish here.
UndoReverted
- 06:4506:45, 21 February 2022
diff hist +108 m
Charge (warfare)
Undid revision 1073042874 by LaHire07 (talk) edit with no sources is reverted
UndoReverted
20 February 2022
- 18:0718:07, 20 February 2022
diff hist +108
Charge (warfare)
Undid revision 1073031905 by LaHire07 (talk) Watch the language you use. I reverted your edit because you didn't bring any source. Add a source and its okay
UndoReverted
- 18:0518:05, 20 February 2022 diff hist −15 m Karboğazı ambush You keep being malevolent despite I provided every source you asked for. First, you asked for the book, then the page, then the quote. I provided them all every time you asked but you keep reverting my edit without any source at all. Be as honorable as Mesnil and accept the reality. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 17:3417:34, 20 February 2022
diff hist +108 m
Charge (warfare)
Undid revision 1072454580 by LaHire07 (talk) no source
UndoReverted
- 17:2917:29, 20 February 2022 diff hist −15 Karboğazı ambush you can't say it is unreliable just because you can't believe it. Bring any other reliable source that says otherwise. They gave Mesnil his sword because they were honorable people, and Mesnil tried to fight and save his soldiers. This alone deserves respect. If we consider he was invading their homeland, we can say Turkish soldiers were generous in their acts. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
9 February 2022
- 20:5320:53, 9 February 2022 diff hist +376 m Ayran origins
8 February 2022
- 17:0717:07, 8 February 2022 diff hist −15 m Karboğazı ambush Should we change every information on Wikipedia as ( ... claim) after checking who wrote it
- 16:5816:58, 8 February 2022 diff hist +1,573 Karboğazı ambush →The clash
- 15:0215:02, 8 February 2022 diff hist +285 Talk:Karboğazı ambush →44 Turkish soldiers
- 14:3314:33, 8 February 2022 diff hist −15 Karboğazı ambush Again, numbers are from the official battle report. Do not change the title until you disprove its reliability. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 14:3114:31, 8 February 2022 diff hist +425 Talk:Karboğazı ambush →44 Turkish soldiers
- 14:1514:15, 8 February 2022 diff hist +244 Talk:Karboğazı ambush →44 Turkish soldiers
7 February 2022
- 21:4021:40, 7 February 2022
diff hist −41
Karboğazı ambush
Undid revision 1070497097 by LaHire07 (talk) The numbers are not provided by the author. It's from the battle report and the author just quoted it.
Undo
- 21:3821:38, 7 February 2022 diff hist +884 Talk:Karboğazı ambush →44 Turkish soldiers
- 13:0113:01, 7 February 2022 diff hist +193 Talk:Karboğazı ambush →44 men
- 12:5612:56, 7 February 2022 diff hist +122 Karboğazı ambush →POW and other casualties
- 12:4412:44, 7 February 2022 diff hist +292 m Karboğazı ambush source with quote
- 12:3812:38, 7 February 2022 diff hist +1,125 Talk:Karboğazı ambush →44 Turkish soldiers
- 12:2212:22, 7 February 2022 diff hist +290 m Karboğazı ambush source with quote
