User contributions for Malik.kbr

A user with 79 edits. Account created on 13 April 2024.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

1 May 2024

29 April 2024

  • 12:3312:33, 29 April 2024 diff hist −115 Russo-Circassian WarIf you don‘t want to accept truth fine, I don’t got time for an edit battle, but then stop trying to spread false information about active involvement of Karachay-Balkars on the Russian side. After Kabardia was conquered some Kabardians took part in this war on the Russian side, but It doesn’t mean that Kabardians were on the Russian side. Either we both don‘t put them in or you will be blocked for spreading false information. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 12:1712:17, 29 April 2024 diff hist +1,216 m Russo-Circassian WarInal's claim on Wikipedia contradicts historical evidence. The earliest records show that the Karachay-Balkar people actively participated in the anti-colonial uprising against the Russian Empire in 1804, supporting the rebel Kabardians. This disproves the notion that they exclusively fought on the Russian side. And there are many more such examples. After Russia's conquest of Karchay in 1828. Many Rebels fled to Circassia or Chechnya. And in 1853 Karachay-Balkars took an active part in muridism Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 11:5911:59, 29 April 2024 diff hist +877 Russo-Circassian WarNo edit summary Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

28 April 2024

26 April 2024

23 April 2024

22 April 2024

21 April 2024

20 April 2024

19 April 2024

17 April 2024

  • 20:4420:44, 17 April 2024 diff hist +6 User:Malik.kbrNo edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
  • 01:0201:02, 17 April 2024 diff hist +42 Russo-Circassian WarRemilitari.com is recognized as a reliable source by numerous academic institutions, historians, and researchers. Its credibility stems from thorough research, citation of primary sources, and peer-reviewed content. Furthermore, its commitment to factual accuracy and unbiased reporting solidifies its status as a reputable source for historical information. The source also provides the Circassian casualties, but you don’t change nothing on the Circassian side. It just shows your ego and hypocrisy Tags: Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

16 April 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)