User contributions for Shardok
Appearance
A user with 156 edits. Account created on 16 June 2009.
24 July 2022
- 14:1014:10, 24 July 2022 diff hist +2 TV advertisements by country →United States: today again, this section of rhe article rly needs a rework or someone needs to get recent data; bcuz all the information is from articles posted between 2005-2013, and acts like that all is "Today". Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 14:0714:07, 24 July 2022 diff hist +2 TV advertisements by country →United States: Changing very old wording that said "Today" to the yr that the source claiming such was actually posted. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
11 July 2022
- 20:0320:03, 11 July 2022 diff hist +193 Talk:Disability Pride Week No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
7 May 2022
- 16:1516:15, 7 May 2022 diff hist +5 Dude If dude evolved to mean any "male person" then it shud probs point out originally that dude meant a specific kind of *male* person; rather than vaguely sayin person from the start and then switchin to male person later in the paragraph. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
30 March 2022
- 04:1304:13, 30 March 2022 diff hist +557 Talk:Applied behavior analysis →In 2020, the FDA banned the use of electrical stimulation devices... but a circuit court overturned this: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
19 March 2022
- 01:1501:15, 19 March 2022 diff hist +1,134 Talk:Adult diaper →Seann Odoms is wrongly implied to work for Men's Health: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
27 June 2020
- 11:4311:43, 27 June 2020 diff hist +1 Creampie (sexual act) →Health risks: Inclusivity matters; happy pride. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:4011:40, 27 June 2020 diff hist +2 Creampie (sexual act) forgot to change pronoun Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:3911:39, 27 June 2020 diff hist +2 Creampie (sexual act) Not only males can ejaculate using their dicks; Intersex ppl exist and as do trans ppl. Simply making things more inclusivrly worded cuz is necessary to show support. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
21 June 2020
- 06:5006:50, 21 June 2020 diff hist +139 Autism Fixed very outdated introduction that suggested that Aspergers is still a new diagnosis someone can be given. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 05:0605:06, 21 June 2020 diff hist +31 Monaco →Government: deadlink Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
20 June 2020
- 12:0812:08, 20 June 2020 diff hist +1,902 Talk:Cluster B personality disorders →Dr. Baron-Cohen: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:5411:54, 20 June 2020 diff hist +4 Cluster B personality disorders →Cluster B traits and common symptoms: Added hypwrlink to Dr. Baron-Cohen's wili page as ppl deserve to be able to easily discover tbat this mans theories were all bunk and tbat he also posited that Autistic people have no empathy 9.9 Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 11:5011:50, 20 June 2020 diff hist +287 User talk:Shardok No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
15 June 2020
- 02:3202:32, 15 June 2020 diff hist −43 Three Percenters →Foundation and membership: CNN is a secondary source. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
25 September 2019
- 08:2508:25, 25 September 2019 diff hist +238 Talk:Rebecca Sugar No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:2308:23, 25 September 2019 diff hist +162 Talk:Rebecca Sugar No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:2108:21, 25 September 2019 diff hist +15 Rebecca Sugar →Career: pronouns Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:1608:16, 25 September 2019 diff hist +2 Rebecca Sugar →Early life: correct pronoun usage Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:1308:13, 25 September 2019 diff hist +10 Rebecca Sugar She is not a woman, she is a nonbinary woman. It is wrong to change it back to woman just because no woman has ever done what she has done. Guess what; the first woman to become what she became... Is not her, because she's not a woman. It's someone else who should not go down as the second, because that someone else is actually a woman and not a nonbinary woman. Nonbinary people, even ones that align strongly with another gender, do not want recognition of achievements that are not ours to... Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
1 May 2019
- 12:5012:50, 1 May 2019 diff hist 0 Chilling Adventures of Sabrina (TV series) →Cast and characters: Re-added Lachlan Watson as a Main character because they play a main character who was in every episode of season one and likely same for season two but I haven't yet seen. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 12:4712:47, 1 May 2019 diff hist +25 Chilling Adventures of Sabrina (TV series) Re-added Lachlan Watson as a Main character because they play a main character who was in every episode of season one (and likely same for season two, but only three episdoes in myself). No reason they shouldn't be there. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
1 July 2013
- 20:0920:09, 1 July 2013 diff hist +247 Talk:GameCrazy No edit summary
- 20:0820:08, 1 July 2013 diff hist +28 m GameCrazy Clarifying a bit on the two locations.
24 July 2012
- 08:1608:16, 24 July 2012 diff hist +47 m Torchlight II →Availability
11 July 2012
- 09:2009:20, 11 July 2012 diff hist +10 m Chronostasis The claim that we Only notice it when looking at a watch goes against a few other claims, such as those in the first and last paragraph.
9 June 2012
- 04:1004:10, 9 June 2012 diff hist +2,196 m David Willis (cartoonist) →Dumbing of Age: Fixed typos
21 May 2012
- 07:4307:43, 21 May 2012 diff hist +248 Talk:Dragon's Dogma →Released on PC?
- 07:4107:41, 21 May 2012 diff hist +15 m Dragon's Dogma →Reception: Reworded first sentence of criticism, made it sound like there Was free fast travel in game, which is false.
- 07:4007:40, 21 May 2012 diff hist +1,539 Dragon's Dogma →Reception: I hate being impartial. I wanted to write this entire section using only quotes from those that scored >80 for it, but I felt obligated to throw in those psychos scoring it around 40-60... Even if they are crazy.
17 December 2011
- 03:2503:25, 17 December 2011 diff hist −9 m Face of Mankind Can't find anywhere that they claim to be getting it rated... And I think it'd be rated on ESRB's website by now if they were.
- 03:2103:21, 17 December 2011 diff hist −4 m Face of Mankind No edit summary
- 03:1803:18, 17 December 2011 diff hist +201 m Face of Mankind Fixed the lack of titles >.<
- 03:1503:15, 17 December 2011 diff hist +4,657 Face of Mankind →Description
23 July 2011
- 18:0818:08, 23 July 2011 diff hist −28 m Cheesesteak No edit summary
11 July 2011
- 06:0206:02, 11 July 2011 diff hist +2 m Talk:The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim →Pre-Order Bonuses?
- 06:0106:01, 11 July 2011 diff hist +244 Talk:The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim →Pre-Order Bonuses?
- 05:5705:57, 11 July 2011 diff hist −158 Women in the military by country →United States: Marked as unreferenced before, someone removed marking but still no reference. Saved sentence on talk page to add in later if anyone Does have a reference.
- 05:5305:53, 11 July 2011 diff hist −12 m Quotation marks in English No edit summary
- 05:5105:51, 11 July 2011 diff hist +2 m Quotation marks in English →Incorrect usage
29 May 2011
13 May 2011
- 00:4000:40, 13 May 2011 diff hist +543 Talk:Brink (video game) →Bias on the reception section
- 00:3400:34, 13 May 2011 diff hist +6 Brink (video game) Undid revision 428823950 by Flash512 (talk) According to Metacritic: 77: Generally Positive. 69: Mixed/Average. 74: Generally Positive. Poor would be mostly 40 and under. Mixed to poor 40-55
12 May 2011
- 12:0712:07, 12 May 2011 diff hist +43 Brink (video game) →Reception: Every other game with metacritic between 70 and 80is listed as relatively positive or so that I've seen. "mixed reviews" are generally 60-70 or so.
11 May 2011
- 05:4905:49, 11 May 2011 diff hist +5 Brink (video game) →Pre-order bonuses: UK has a Wal-mart equivalent (ASDA?), don't they? Any refs?
- 05:4305:43, 11 May 2011 diff hist +12 m 2011 PlayStation Network outage Undid revision 428510623 by Yellowdesk (talk) See Talk: Current tag Stays.
- 01:0201:02, 11 May 2011 diff hist −7 m Brink (video game) →Reception: I almost want to change that to "Brink received reviews upon release." Anything else seems to add too much bias. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baldur%27s_Gate:_Dark_Alliance_II#Critical_reception Based opening statement on prior norm
9 May 2011
- 21:1021:10, 9 May 2011 diff hist −20 2011 PlayStation Network outage →Sony Online Entertainment outage: Other guy never mentioned, nor did he make either quote. And apparently it doesn't make sense who made which quote if someone thought they both made the quotes. 3 people and 2 quotes, really?
- 06:5006:50, 9 May 2011 diff hist −13 2011 PlayStation Network outage →Unencrypted personal details: Saying such as passwords is A: Not needed B: Misleading. It's misleading because as is stated later down; passwords were hashed, which technically isn't encrypted.
- 06:4706:47, 9 May 2011 diff hist +319 User talk:Shardok →Comments by security experts