User contributions for WWIReferences
A user with 382 edits. Account created on 13 February 2018.
27 May 2019
- 08:2508:25, 27 May 2019 diff hist +1,322 User talk:NiD.29 →Foster Mounting on Nieuport 16: new section
23 May 2019
- 17:4917:49, 23 May 2019 diff hist +36 Nieuport 11 Actually - if we're talking about the introduction of the 16 (XVI) with a synchronised gun the time is about right - early foster mounts were fitted to 11s (XI)
20 May 2019
- 11:4411:44, 20 May 2019 diff hist 0 Aladdin Looking for the right word here - if "attributed to" is a little kind to Galland and "stole from" is too blunt? He did mention Diab in his diary, at least.
- 11:3211:32, 20 May 2019
diff hist +68
Aladdin
Please, we've had so much to and fro on this one! If we need to change the reference there are stacks already there in the "sources" section of the article - in fact do we need to have them here, in the lede as well?
Undo
- 11:1411:14, 20 May 2019 diff hist −128 Talk:Roman numerals →All civilisations are limited by the state of their science and technology!: rearrange my own post(s) here
- 11:0111:01, 20 May 2019 diff hist +588 Talk:Roman numerals →All civilisations are limited by the state of their science and technology!: A further thought
- 10:4510:45, 20 May 2019 diff hist +520 Talk:Roman numerals →All civilisations are limited by the state of their science and technology!: Hope I'm not treading on anyone's toes here!
- 10:1910:19, 20 May 2019
diff hist +8
Roman numerals
"XVI" can't be a "valid" roman numeral for "MLX" however liberal we are in allowing variants. At the very least it "MAY be an error" which is all the existing text says.
Undo
19 April 2019
- 04:5404:54, 19 April 2019 diff hist −8 Manfred von Richthofen No edit summary
13 April 2019
- 19:0219:02, 13 April 2019 diff hist −26 Royal Aircraft Factory S.E.5 After all that - a messed up reference!
27 March 2019
- 08:5508:55, 27 March 2019 diff hist −32 Aviation in World War I No edit summary
19 March 2019
- 10:4010:40, 19 March 2019 diff hist +5 Royal Aircraft Factory B.E.2 →Survivors and reproductions: fixed?
- 10:3310:33, 19 March 2019 diff hist +263 Royal Aircraft Factory B.E.2 →Survivors and reproductions: add cite
- 09:4909:49, 19 March 2019 diff hist −14 Royal Aircraft Factory B.E.2 →Variants: This needs to be succinct - it is a summary of matter already much more comprehensively covered elsewhere in the article. But the whole tailplane was changed, not just the elevators, and the wings had a different planform and lateral control system, rather than just being a staggered version of the old wing, as implied in this edit.
13 March 2019
- 02:2402:24, 13 March 2019
diff hist −23
Synchronization gear
Undid revision 887487940 by Mirko. .diego (talk)
Undo
1 March 2019
- 01:0601:06, 1 March 2019 diff hist −29,211 User:WWIReferences/sandbox Blank as article now fixed current Tag: Blanking
26 February 2019
- 21:2421:24, 26 February 2019 diff hist +1 Aladdin Fix references etc.
24 February 2019
- 22:0622:06, 24 February 2019 diff hist +253 Aladdin Added ref to another page on same site as one cited in recent edit - useful background on Hanna/Youhenna - changed format of cite to Harvard format used for other academic references in this article.
- 21:5921:59, 24 February 2019 diff hist 0 User:WWIReferences/sandbox final?
- 21:5121:51, 24 February 2019 diff hist −166 User:WWIReferences/sandbox harvard 2
- 21:4621:46, 24 February 2019 diff hist 0 User:WWIReferences/sandbox →Bibliography: alphabet 2
- 21:4421:44, 24 February 2019 diff hist 0 User:WWIReferences/sandbox →Bibliography: alphabet
- 21:4221:42, 24 February 2019 diff hist +183 User:WWIReferences/sandbox Harvard 1
- 21:3821:38, 24 February 2019 diff hist −29 User:WWIReferences/sandbox fixing 3
- 21:3621:36, 24 February 2019 diff hist +5 User:WWIReferences/sandbox fixing 2
- 21:3321:33, 24 February 2019 diff hist −45 User:WWIReferences/sandbox fixing 1
- 21:2521:25, 24 February 2019 diff hist +305 User:WWIReferences/sandbox former edit
- 21:2121:21, 24 February 2019 diff hist +28,958 User:WWIReferences/sandbox Copy article for editing
21 February 2019
- 23:3723:37, 21 February 2019 diff hist +4 Aviation in World War I Since the article is primarily in English rather than American - have standardised spelling of "aeroplane" (actually this was also a common U.S. spelling in this period anyway!) Good to be consistent within an article on points like this, anyway.
- 23:2123:21, 21 February 2019
diff hist −1
J. W. Dunne
Original punctuation makes better sense.
Undo
- 22:5622:56, 21 February 2019 diff hist −17 Aladdin Pedanticism (either way) seems rather silly in this context - no need to vary the name used for the "main" article in this wikilink.
12 February 2019
- 03:0703:07, 12 February 2019 diff hist 0 Messerschmitt Bf 109 Teat edit?
- 02:3802:38, 12 February 2019 diff hist +2 Royal Aircraft Factory B.E.2 →Western Front: This seems to have been the original word used - since the claim was a particularly wild one, as well as being later denounced as libellous by both enquiries "claimed" is surely better than "said" in this context.
- 02:2602:26, 12 February 2019 diff hist −16 Royal Aircraft Factory B.E.2 →Western Front: more tweaks
- 02:1202:12, 12 February 2019 diff hist +85 Royal Aircraft Factory B.E.2 Further tweak of wikilink to produce exact text intended - other minor changes to made section read more clearly and naturally.
- 01:5201:52, 12 February 2019 diff hist −52 Royal Aircraft Factory B.E.2 →Western Front: A link to another wiki article does not need to go "external" - just use double square brackets "[[" - with the actual article name! - rearranged clauses in sentence for clarity.
12 January 2019
- 04:4404:44, 12 January 2019 diff hist +463 Talk:Royal Aircraft Factory F.E.9 →Sesquiplane?: Uncle!
26 November 2018
- 00:0000:00, 26 November 2018 diff hist +1,441 Talk:Nieuport 17 →Flights of fancy and Gun synchronisation: Chiming in on forum style debate!
4 November 2018
- 19:3619:36, 4 November 2018 diff hist −8 Bentley BR2 →Design and development: "Comfortable" or not - it was to be in English!
31 October 2018
- 20:2420:24, 31 October 2018 diff hist +339 Talk:Roman numerals →Edits made very late at night!!: At least I don't seem to have mucked anything up!
29 October 2018
- 12:2012:20, 29 October 2018 diff hist −21 Nieuport 17 →Survivors and replicas: CE - Empty verbiage.
- 12:1412:14, 29 October 2018 diff hist +2 Nieuport 17 →Operational history: No variant form of English I am familiar with!
- 12:0912:09, 29 October 2018 diff hist −5 Nieuport 17 →Derivatives: CE, a little neater?
- 12:0212:02, 29 October 2018 diff hist +1 Nieuport 17 →Design: Just hit me on re-reading this - or does "tub" have a technical meaning in this context?
11 October 2018
- 22:4022:40, 11 October 2018 diff hist −99 Synchronization gear →The decline and end of synchronization: More succinct text reads better(?) and does not lose any important nuance(?) - see what you think anyway.
- 12:5812:58, 11 October 2018 diff hist −36 John Brown's Body →Other related texts: Although it could be cleaned up a bit
- 12:5312:53, 11 October 2018 diff hist −38 John Brown's Body →Other related texts: NOT the kind of statement that the "citation needed" template is useful for, although if some helpful soul can find the odd website (for illustration rather than verification!)
21 September 2018
- 05:5005:50, 21 September 2018 diff hist −11 Messerschmitt Bf 109 "Oxford commas" not Wikipedia style
20 September 2018
- 22:4522:45, 20 September 2018 diff hist +5 Aladdin →References: Improve layout of long reflist
31 August 2018
- 05:4605:46, 31 August 2018 diff hist −7 Aladdin →Television: Assuming this is good faith edit I have wikified it