Talk:2021 Minar-e-Pakistan mass sexual assault: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
Extended confirmed users
16,687 edits
Extended confirmed users
16,687 edits
Line 181: Line 181:
:Pl. do suggest. Thanks
:Pl. do suggest. Thanks
:[[User:Bookku| Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge']] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 14:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
:[[User:Bookku| Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge']] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 14:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

== Edit dif 1104699210 ==

Edit dif 1104699210 needs dispute resolution.

Edit dif 1104699210 with misleading summary, seems to delete sourced and important content; same time adds content in [[Wikipedia:WikiVoice|WP:Wikivoice]] giving credence to victim blaming conspiracy theory against a female victim, even though medico-legal examination report clearly supports female victim's case, hence such content changes breach [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:SUSPECT&redirect=no WP:SUSPECT] Wikipedia conventions. I shall elaborate both the issues in separate sub sections below.

Creation and addition of conspiracy theories seemingly in an efforts to mislead and [[Wikipedia:CENSOR|censor]] against victim, seem to be result of psychological process of [[Wikipedia:I just don't like it|I just don't like it]] (denial) since incidence happened in precincts of a national monument on national independence day.

* '''Misleading summary''' of edit dif: ".. Added later developments, removed the rest from lede as it is covered below .."


'''Deletion'''

'''Deleted content''': ".. According to a medico-legal examination, the victim was found to have dozens of bruises and scratches on her body including her chest, waist, legs, and elbow, plus inflammation on the neck and hands.<ref>{{Cite web |date=20 August 2021 |title=Medical report of Ayesha Akram reveals severe bruises on victim's body |url=https://mmnews.tv/medical-report-of-ayesha-akram-reveals-severe-bruises-on-victims-body/ |access-date=13 October 2021 |website=MM News TV |language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=20 August 2021 |title=Minar-e-Pakistan incident: Victim's medico-legal assessment completed {{!}} Dunya News |url=http://video.dunyanews.tv/index.php/en/mustwatch/137289/Minar-e-Pakistan-incident:-Victim%27s-medico-legal-assessment-completed |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210820071859/https://dunyanews.tv/en/Pakistan/615740-Minar-e-Pakistan-incident-Victim-medico-legal-assessment-completed |archive-date=August 20, 2021 |access-date=13 October 2021 |website=video.dunyanews.tv}}</ref> The silence of the large group of spectators present, the inadequate response of security guards during the event, and the delayed police response were criticised.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Arjio |first=Nazeer |date=25 August 2021 |title=Pakistan Needs To Devise A Strategy Against Widespread Sexual Terrorism |url=https://www.thefridaytimes.com/pakistan-needs-to-devise-a-strategy-against-widespread-sexual-terrorism/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210825150659/https://www.thefridaytimes.com/pakistan-needs-to-devise-a-strategy-against-widespread-sexual-terrorism/ |archive-date=25 August 2021 |access-date=18 September 2021 |website=The Friday Times – Naya Daur |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Hyat |first=Kamila |date=27 August 2021 |title=The world of women |url=https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/883597-the-world-of-women |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210827012231/https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/883597-the-world-of-women |archive-date=27 August 2021 |access-date=19 September 2021 |website=www.thenews.com.pk |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=19 August 2021 |title=Outrage in Pakistan after hundreds of men crowd female TikToker, tearing her clothes |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/south-asia/pakistan-independence-day-tiktok-assault-b1904538.html |access-date=19 September 2021 |website=The Independent |language=en}}</ref> .."

a) Important parts of the content body are to be included in lede and not vice versa hence edit summary is misleading one.

b) When victim is under huge pressure of victim blaming 'medico-legal examination' is core supportive factor and needs to find place in article lede itself.

c) Failure in attending untoward incidence at a national monument that too on national independence day whatever the nature of incidence might be is glaring security flaw and needs to find mention in the lede itself.


'''Addition'''

".. The case later turned out to be a pre-planned incident for getting fame and extortion money during police investigation.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Desk |first=News |date=2021-08-19 |title=Investigation Reveals Ayesha Akram Planned Minar E Pakistan Incident As A Publicity Stunt With Her Partner Rambo |url=https://pakistanfrontier.com/2021/08/19/investigation-reveals-ayesha-akram-planned-minar-e-pakistan-incident-as-a-publicity-stunt-with-her-partner-rambo/ |access-date=2022-08-16 |website=The Pakistan Frontier |language=en-US}}</ref> Audiotapes emerged of victim and her associate Rambo about the planning which later on both blamed one another for blackmailing.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-10-09 |title=Minar-e-Pakistan incident: Tiktoker Rambo claims Ayesha Akram wanted to extort money from suspects |url=https://www.geo.tv/latest/374867-minar-e-pakistan-incident-tiktoker-rambo-claims-ayesha-akram-wanted-to-extort-money-from-suspects |access-date=2022-08-16 |website=Geo.tv |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2021-10-11 |title=Minar-e-Pakistan incident: New audio tape exposes ‘extortion plan’ of Ayesha Akram and Rambo |url=https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/11-Oct-2021/minarepakistan-incident-new-audio-tape-exposes-alleged-extortion-plans-of-ayeshaakram-and-rambo |access-date=2022-08-16 |website=Daily Pakistan Global |language=en}}</ref> .."


d) Above accusations are improper and unfair defamatory against female victim. Pakistan's legal culture itself allows accused to settle criminal legal cases against monitory benefit to victim. When men benefit in huge number of cases in rampant honor crime against women then men are not blamed but women are and credence [[WP:undue]] weightage to such conspiracy theory is cause of concern.

e) Above accusations still not part of official charge sheet against the female victim. Case is still in the court likely to be heard some time in coming couple of months. before giving credence to conspiracy theory IMHO respected editors wait for court rulings.

f) As I have gone through other article discussions even accused names are not supposed to be mentioned until charge sheet is filed. IMHO It is against Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:SUSPECT&redirect=no WP:SUSPECT] and conventions.


[[User:Bookku|&#32;Bookku, &#39;Encyclopedias &#61; expanding information &#38; knowledge&#39;]] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 04:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)




[[User:Bookku|&#32;Bookku, &#39;Encyclopedias &#61; expanding information &#38; knowledge&#39;]] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 04:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:27, 17 August 2022

Relevant discussions

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 11:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One (brutal) criminal event doesn't justify a Wikipedia article (sorry)

Sorry: how sad this crime and accident may be, Wikipedia can't and shouldn't qualify every incident, sexual or otherwise, to merit a Wikipedia lemma. (See also Wikipedia:Notability.) --Corriebertus (talk) 13:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Corriebertus: Thanks for your frank opinion. Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 13:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with
WP:NOTNEWS). I could help clean up and improve this article, but at this point it is not clear if it would meet Wikipedia:Notability (events). Best to wait a few months, even a year, and see if RS are still talking about it.VR talk 13:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Continuation of event coverage




  • December 2021

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 09:04, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trajectory of crime in precincts of Minar-e-Pakistan and Lahore

[1]

References

  1. ^ https://www.dawn.com/news/1641229/case-against-400-for-harassing-making-fun-of-youtuber , https://images.dawn.com/news/1188213/twitter-users-renew-calls-of-yes-all-men-after-woman-assaulted-by-400-men-at-minar-e-pakistan , https://www.dawn.com/news/1641195 , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOwAZFVlgYI&t=31s , https://pakistanfrontier.com/2021/08/19/investigation-reveals-ayesha-akram-planned-minar-e-pakistan-incident-as-a-publicity-stunt-with-her-partner-rambo/ https://www.brandsynario.com/another-female-tiktoker-blames-the-victim-for-minar-e-pakistan-incident/ https://www.dawn.com/news/1642014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRgtGl_yfww https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ny4a3DZjx8 https://dailytimes.com.pk/807469/police-submits-report-in-tiktoker-assault-case/ https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/883597-the-world-of-women https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/887777-minar-e-pakistan-incident-court-releases-98-suspects https://tribune.com.pk/story/2318994/new-world-same-violence-the-questionable-freedom-digital-spaces-enable-for-women https://www.thefridaytimes.com/pakistan-needs-to-devise-a-strategy-against-widespread-sexual-terrorism/ https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/pakistan-police-release-155-suspects-arrested-in-the-sexual-assault-of-a-youtuber-girl/article36333256.ece https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/09-Sep-2021/court-trashes-plea-seeking-case-against-tiktoker-ayesha-akram-friend , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9w99p-mXOOk&t=4s , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFAIP5nTnI , https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/11-Oct-2021/minar-e-pakistan-incident-new-audio-tape-exposes-extortion-plan-of-ayesha-akram-and-rambo , https://www.bolnews.com/trending/2021/10/iqrar-ul-hassan-apologizes-for-supporting-ayesha-ikram-after-her-audio-leak/ , https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/12-Oct-2021/3-more-arrested-as-minar-e-pakistan-harassment-case-takes-another-twist , https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/13-Oct-2021/minar-e-pakistan-incident-another-audiotape-of-ayesha-akram-rambo-surfaces , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAIsPEb4FYE , interview with Dolphin Force man : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Woi7_zc5SA , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iUwQ3gIlyE https://www.dawn.com/news/1650972/minar-i-pakistan-case-complainants-associate-seven-others-arrested https://www.dawn.com/news/1662919 https://www.etcnews.tv/tiktoker-ayesha-akram-traffic-accident-mein-zakhmi/ https://nation.com.pk/19-Dec-2021/police-registers-another-sexual-harassment-case-at-minar-e-pakistan , https://www.bolnews.com/latest/2022/01/minar-i-pakistan-assault-case-lahore-court-grants-post-arrest-bail-to-suspect/ , https://arynews.tv/rambo-gets-bail-in-tiktoker-ayesha-akram-blackmailing-case/ https://www.brecorder.com/news/40181640/court-issues-notices-to-suspects-in-lahore-assault-case News report



Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 14:34, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 12:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Location

Imported from Talk:Minar-e-Pakistan Just for record: While one user admitting notability of incidence raised a query on my user talk page whether incidence happened @ Minar-e-Pakistan or adjacent Greater Iqbal Park? I replied as below:

Thanks for discussing.

Dawn news report: In the first information report (FIR) registered at the Lorry Adda police station, a copy of which is available with Dawn.com, the complainant stated that she, along with six companions, were filming a video near Minar-e-Pakistan on Independence Day when around 300 to 400 people "attacked us"....She said that she and her companions made a lot of effort to escape from the crowd. Observing the situation, the park's security guard opened the gate to the enclosure around Minar-e-Pakistan, the FIR quotes her as saying..."However, the crowd was huge and people were scaling the enclosure and coming towards us..
Samaa.tv report is more specific: A still from the video of the mob that attacked the woman on August 14, 2021 at Greater Iqbal Park and Minar-e-Pakistan....The incident took place on the public holiday Saturday at the Greater Iqbal Park at the Minar-e-Pakistan monument. The victim said that she was at the Minar-e-Pakistan with her friends to make a video for her YouTube channel when suddenly more than 300 to 400 men attacked them. The victim said when she and her friends tried to get away from the crowd, the guards at the Minar opened the gate of the fence and they went inside..The men jumped over the fence and surged towards us and started...
Even Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan referred incidence in his speech as Minar-e-Pakistan incidence.
It is almost a two hour thing so more details will emerge as police investigation and court cases move forward. Again Pakistan does have track record of victim blaming and also window dressing media but same time over a period of time scholarly academic books also keep coming up and visible written and street activism from women's movements and civil society. so let us see how things move forward and kind of references keep becoming available.
Pl. do suggest. Thanks
Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 14:28, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit dif 1104699210

Edit dif 1104699210 needs dispute resolution.

Edit dif 1104699210 with misleading summary, seems to delete sourced and important content; same time adds content in

WP:Wikivoice giving credence to victim blaming conspiracy theory against a female victim, even though medico-legal examination report clearly supports female victim's case, hence such content changes breach WP:SUSPECT
Wikipedia conventions. I shall elaborate both the issues in separate sub sections below.

Creation and addition of conspiracy theories seemingly in an efforts to mislead and

censor against victim, seem to be result of psychological process of I just don't like it
(denial) since incidence happened in precincts of a national monument on national independence day.

  • Misleading summary of edit dif: ".. Added later developments, removed the rest from lede as it is covered below .."


Deletion

Deleted content: ".. According to a medico-legal examination, the victim was found to have dozens of bruises and scratches on her body including her chest, waist, legs, and elbow, plus inflammation on the neck and hands.[1][2] The silence of the large group of spectators present, the inadequate response of security guards during the event, and the delayed police response were criticised.[3][4][5] .."

a) Important parts of the content body are to be included in lede and not vice versa hence edit summary is misleading one.

b) When victim is under huge pressure of victim blaming 'medico-legal examination' is core supportive factor and needs to find place in article lede itself.

c) Failure in attending untoward incidence at a national monument that too on national independence day whatever the nature of incidence might be is glaring security flaw and needs to find mention in the lede itself.


Addition

".. The case later turned out to be a pre-planned incident for getting fame and extortion money during police investigation.[6] Audiotapes emerged of victim and her associate Rambo about the planning which later on both blamed one another for blackmailing.[7][8] .."


d) Above accusations are improper and unfair defamatory against female victim. Pakistan's legal culture itself allows accused to settle criminal legal cases against monitory benefit to victim. When men benefit in huge number of cases in rampant honor crime against women then men are not blamed but women are and credence

WP:undue
weightage to such conspiracy theory is cause of concern.

e) Above accusations still not part of official charge sheet against the female victim. Case is still in the court likely to be heard some time in coming couple of months. before giving credence to conspiracy theory IMHO respected editors wait for court rulings.

f) As I have gone through other article discussions even accused names are not supposed to be mentioned until charge sheet is filed. IMHO It is against Wikipedia WP:SUSPECT and conventions.


Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 04:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 04:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ "Medical report of Ayesha Akram reveals severe bruises on victim's body". MM News TV. 20 August 2021. Retrieved 13 October 2021.
  2. ^ "Minar-e-Pakistan incident: Victim's medico-legal assessment completed | Dunya News". video.dunyanews.tv. 20 August 2021. Archived from the original on August 20, 2021. Retrieved 13 October 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  3. ^ Arjio, Nazeer (25 August 2021). "Pakistan Needs To Devise A Strategy Against Widespread Sexual Terrorism". The Friday Times – Naya Daur. Archived from the original on 25 August 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
  4. ^ Hyat, Kamila (27 August 2021). "The world of women". www.thenews.com.pk. Archived from the original on 27 August 2021. Retrieved 19 September 2021.
  5. ^ "Outrage in Pakistan after hundreds of men crowd female TikToker, tearing her clothes". The Independent. 19 August 2021. Retrieved 19 September 2021.
  6. ^ Desk, News (2021-08-19). "Investigation Reveals Ayesha Akram Planned Minar E Pakistan Incident As A Publicity Stunt With Her Partner Rambo". The Pakistan Frontier. Retrieved 2022-08-16. {{cite web}}: |first= has generic name (help)
  7. ^ "Minar-e-Pakistan incident: Tiktoker Rambo claims Ayesha Akram wanted to extort money from suspects". Geo.tv. 2021-10-09. Retrieved 2022-08-16.
  8. ^ "Minar-e-Pakistan incident: New audio tape exposes 'extortion plan' of Ayesha Akram and Rambo". Daily Pakistan Global. 2021-10-11. Retrieved 2022-08-16.