User talk:Valereee: Difference between revisions
Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 13,944 edits →Stop immediately: wrong answer |
→Stop immediately: Reply |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
:Jack, the ONUS is on the editor who wants to include, as we've told you repeatedly. I've [[Special:Diff/1125932718|claimed exemption]] from 3RR per potential BLP violation. [[User:Valereee|Valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee#top|talk]]) 17:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC) |
:Jack, the ONUS is on the editor who wants to include, as we've told you repeatedly. I've [[Special:Diff/1125932718|claimed exemption]] from 3RR per potential BLP violation. [[User:Valereee|Valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee#top|talk]]) 17:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
::I asked you politely to await the end of discussion. No one BUT YOU has suggested that this is BLPvio, and using it as a defense against 3RR isn't going to shield you from the consequences. I will suggest that you immediately self-revert and await the end of discussion, or other action ''will'' be taken. Please do not force me to take that step. - [[User:Jack Sebastian|Jack Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Jack Sebastian|talk]]) 17:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC) |
::I asked you politely to await the end of discussion. No one BUT YOU has suggested that this is BLPvio, and using it as a defense against 3RR isn't going to shield you from the consequences. I will suggest that you immediately self-revert and await the end of discussion, or other action ''will'' be taken. Please do not force me to take that step. - [[User:Jack Sebastian|Jack Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Jack Sebastian|talk]]) 17:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC) |
||
:::If you want to self-revert, Valereee, I will happily reinstate the edit. Cheers. [[User:Dumuzid|Dumuzid]] ([[User talk:Dumuzid|talk]]) 17:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC) |
|||
:::And I'm telling you politely that the answer is no, I will not leave a potential BLP vio in the article while we are discussing whether it's appropriate to include. [[User:Valereee|Valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee#top|talk]]) 17:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:20, 6 December 2022
Need help and don't know where to find it?
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
I made
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
Administrators' newsletter – December 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).
- Consensus has been found in an RfC to automatically place RfAs on hold after one week.
- The article creation at scale RfC has been closed.
- An RfC on the banners for the December 2022 fundraising campaign has been closed.
- A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 12, 2022 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
- 2021-22 review of the discretionary sanctions systemis open.
- The arbitration case Reversal and reinstatement of Athaenara's block has been closed.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 1 December 2022.
- A Level 2 desysop.
- Tech tip: A single IPv6 connection usually has access to a "subnet" of 18 quintillion IPs. Add
/64
to the end of an IP inconsider blocking the whole subnetrather than an IP that may change within a minute.
DYK for Pigs in blankets
On 5 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pigs in blankets, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that pigs in blankets aren't pigs in a blanket? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pigs in blankets. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pigs in blankets), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2022)
Reconstruction of Lucy, the first Australopithecus afarensis skeleton found
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Medjed • Culinary arts Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
---|
Re: BLP-N section name
I think many folk might get what you were intending, but I think you've used the wrong word there (DYAC) in the section name. Watts is a family annihilator, not a family nihilist. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 06:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Stop immediately
Please stop edit-warring, or I'll be forced to submit a noticeboard complaint about it. Have a little patience and have the courage of your convictions - if you are completely sure you are right, WAIT until a consensus coalesces around that assertion. Edit-warring is just going to get you blocked. Again, stop immediately. This is the only TIME i will offer this warning. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Jack, the ONUS is on the editor who wants to include, as we've told you repeatedly. I've claimed exemption from 3RR per potential BLP violation. Valereee (talk) 17:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- I asked you politely to await the end of discussion. No one BUT YOU has suggested that this is BLPvio, and using it as a defense against 3RR isn't going to shield you from the consequences. I will suggest that you immediately self-revert and await the end of discussion, or other action will be taken. Please do not force me to take that step. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- If you want to self-revert, Valereee, I will happily reinstate the edit. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- And I'm telling you politely that the answer is no, I will not leave a potential BLP vio in the article while we are discussing whether it's appropriate to include. Valereee (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- I asked you politely to await the end of discussion. No one BUT YOU has suggested that this is BLPvio, and using it as a defense against 3RR isn't going to shield you from the consequences. I will suggest that you immediately self-revert and await the end of discussion, or other action will be taken. Please do not force me to take that step. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)