User talk:Valereee: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Content deleted Content added
Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers
13,944 edits
→‎Stop immediately: wrong answer
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 146: Line 146:
:Jack, the ONUS is on the editor who wants to include, as we've told you repeatedly. I've [[Special:Diff/1125932718|claimed exemption]] from 3RR per potential BLP violation. [[User:Valereee|Valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee#top|talk]]) 17:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
:Jack, the ONUS is on the editor who wants to include, as we've told you repeatedly. I've [[Special:Diff/1125932718|claimed exemption]] from 3RR per potential BLP violation. [[User:Valereee|Valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee#top|talk]]) 17:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
::I asked you politely to await the end of discussion. No one BUT YOU has suggested that this is BLPvio, and using it as a defense against 3RR isn't going to shield you from the consequences. I will suggest that you immediately self-revert and await the end of discussion, or other action ''will'' be taken. Please do not force me to take that step. - [[User:Jack Sebastian|Jack Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Jack Sebastian|talk]]) 17:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
::I asked you politely to await the end of discussion. No one BUT YOU has suggested that this is BLPvio, and using it as a defense against 3RR isn't going to shield you from the consequences. I will suggest that you immediately self-revert and await the end of discussion, or other action ''will'' be taken. Please do not force me to take that step. - [[User:Jack Sebastian|Jack Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Jack Sebastian|talk]]) 17:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
:::If you want to self-revert, Valereee, I will happily reinstate the edit. Cheers. [[User:Dumuzid|Dumuzid]] ([[User talk:Dumuzid|talk]]) 17:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
:::And I'm telling you politely that the answer is no, I will not leave a potential BLP vio in the article while we are discussing whether it's appropriate to include. [[User:Valereee|Valereee]] ([[User talk:Valereee#top|talk]]) 17:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:20, 6 December 2022

Need help and don't know where to find it? Help!

I made

☖ 14:11, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

You are AWESOME! Thank you so much! Valereee (talk) 14:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded TheresNoTime
removed TheresNoTime

CheckUser changes

removed TheresNoTime

Oversight changes

removed TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Tech tip: A single IPv6 connection usually has access to a "subnet" of 18 quintillion IPs. Add /64 to the end of an IP in
    consider blocking the whole subnet
    rather than an IP that may change within a minute.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:45, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Pigs in blankets

On 5 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pigs in blankets, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that pigs in blankets aren't pigs in a blanket? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pigs in blankets. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pigs in blankets), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2022)

Reconstruction of Lucy, the first Australopithecus afarensis skeleton found
Hello, Valereee. The article for improvement of the week is:

Human history

Please be bold and help improve it!


Previous selections: Medjed • Culinary arts


Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Re: BLP-N section name

I think many folk might get what you were intending, but I think you've used the wrong word there (DYAC) in the section name. Watts is a family annihilator, not a family nihilist. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 06:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. Valereee (talk) 13:39, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop immediately

Please stop edit-warring, or I'll be forced to submit a noticeboard complaint about it. Have a little patience and have the courage of your convictions - if you are completely sure you are right, WAIT until a consensus coalesces around that assertion. Edit-warring is just going to get you blocked. Again, stop immediately. This is the only TIME i will offer this warning. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jack, the ONUS is on the editor who wants to include, as we've told you repeatedly. I've claimed exemption from 3RR per potential BLP violation. Valereee (talk) 17:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I asked you politely to await the end of discussion. No one BUT YOU has suggested that this is BLPvio, and using it as a defense against 3RR isn't going to shield you from the consequences. I will suggest that you immediately self-revert and await the end of discussion, or other action will be taken. Please do not force me to take that step. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to self-revert, Valereee, I will happily reinstate the edit. Cheers. Dumuzid (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And I'm telling you politely that the answer is no, I will not leave a potential BLP vio in the article while we are discussing whether it's appropriate to include. Valereee (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]