User talk:Explicit: Difference between revisions

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51

This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

It is approximately 7:14 AM where this user lives (South Korea). [refresh]

The Wikipedia Asian Month 2022 Barnstar

Dear Explicit :

Thanks for participating Wikipedia Asian Month 2022. We are grateful of your dedication to Wikimedia movement and hope you join us next year!

Wish you all the best!

Wikipedia Asian Month Team

Hello. I just saw that you deleted this file: [1] that I uploaded with an explanation of its fair use rationale for the article Hunter Biden laptop controversy where this page and story set off a 2+ year political firestorm. The page was sourced from the website of the newspaper, where it is freely available. It has been widely used elsewhere per fair use. Is there something that would need to be added to the explanation I gave in the upload documentation that would enable the image to be restored. Are youc certain that the documentation provided was insufficient? Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 02:48, 24 February 2023 (UTC) @Explicit: I request that this image be restored. If you can provide a reason why it is not fair use for the page of its intended use, I'd appreciate an explanation so that the issues can be addressed. Thank you. SPECIFICO talk 15:45, 28 February 2023 (UTC) @Explicit: Kindly review this request SPECIFICO talk 12:18, 8 March 2023 (UTC) @Explicit:. Please review this and respond. SPECIFICO talk 02:34, 19 March 2023 (UTC) @Explicit: I see that you have made several contributions over the past month without responding to my messages here or to my email. This is the last time I am going to ping you to repeat that request before escalating my concern to Admin review. I think that editors who have taken the time and trouble to upload files and who disagree with or do not understand your deletions deserve the courtesy of your attention in the non-infrequent cases when they come here to ask for further review or discussion. Please review this section and respond. SPECIFICO talk 02:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uninvolved here but see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Explicit - Conduct related to file deletions. SkyWarrior 16:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please restore the File:Hefajate islam logo.jpg, it was a vandalism. Thanks.–MinisterOfReligion ^(Talk) 04:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Explicit. Would you mind checking to see whether File:Ken-Sharpe-Headshot.jpg is the same as File:Ken Sharpe Headshot.jpeg? The file names are similar and the uploader is the same. You deleted the second file per F7 back on January 7. The first file was just uploaded. It was first tagged for not having a license, but then the uploader add a CC license, claiming they own the rights to the photo. If they do "own the rights" and the file is verified by VRT, then great; however, the same image can be found online prior to it being uploaded (e.g. here and here) which makes the "own work" claim seem a bit questionable. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:51, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The file's licensing has been VRT verified which means nothing more probably needs to be done here. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Warpsmith, since the article was recreated? It may end up redirected / merged, so softdeletion may be best anyway. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:22, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Explicit. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{

ygm}} template. SPECIFICO talk 17:24, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply

]