Talk:Vermont PBS

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Stations Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance). United States: Vermont Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Mid-importance).

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:24, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I propose that

• @
  Mrschimpf, Csworldwide1, and BlueboyLINY: Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• A straight-up merger is inadvisable here as the organizations had extensive, 50- and 40-year histories prior to merging. The TV and radio pages have a lot of tables. I would go for this structure: an umbrella article at Vermont Public plus pages at Vermont Public (television) and Vermont Public (radio). I have created a draft of the former page at User:Sammi Brie/Vermont Public to demonstrate what the organization page would look like. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• 'Oppose' merging the articles, both the radio and TV articles should be subtopics of a new Vermont Public article covering the new entity. VPR and VPTV would contain the detailed history of their existences, while VP would start with its creation and only have a light overview of VPR and VPTV prior to VP. -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 19:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Mvcg66b3r you should have left a note at VPR talk page about this proposal, since it also concerns that article. As proposal, it should use the
  mergeto|Vermont Public|discuss=Talk:Vermont PBS#Merger proposal (2022)}} ) -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 19:28, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Requested move 25 June 2022

It has been proposed in this section that Vermont PBS be renamed and moved to Vermont Public (television) . A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Polyamorph (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content below copied from

WP:RM/TR Polyamorph (talk) 16:18, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

• • WP:COMMONNAME? -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Comment I think you should write an article
  wP:NATURALDAB -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 03:52, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • A case could be made for that line of thinking could be made for Vermont Public Radio since that's what the radio side was just renamed from. But "Vermont Public Television" has not been used as a brand name for several years so it doesn't really align with
    WP:NATURALDAB, meaning parenthetical disambiguation makes more sense here. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 15:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• NOTE see the related move request at Talk:Vermont Public Radio -- 64.229.88.43 (talk) 03:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Guidelines at
  WP:NCBC would imply Vermont Public (TV network) would be a more appropriate title should we opt for this disambiguation format. — stickguy (:^›)— || talk || 15:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  That's probably a better fit, honestly, and I'd endorse. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 16:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]