Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
31 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:14 +78 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: This part of Jimmy Wales original statement is fundamental to make clear the link with the fundamental notion of NPOV. In contrast, "reliable sources" can even be used to mean the opposite of NPOV as when people use "reliable" to mean "has a non biased point of view" and this incorrect use of "reliable" happens very often.)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 12:00 −13 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: The "scientific" is misleading when we do not have the historical context, which was a scientific OR. The general principle is not about scientific knowledge only. This historical context was added as footnote, but this is not sufficient.) Tag: Manual revert
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 11:54 −22 Dominic Mayers talk contribs (The notion of reliable sources was not discussed at the time. It's an important point, but not the key point.) Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout 09:40 −5 GhostInTheMachine talk contribs (→Section templates and summary style: use "links" to avoid confusion with actual references)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 09:22 +19 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 09:21 +12 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 09:19 −3 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language: ce)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 09:12 +449 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language: ce turned rewrite!)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 07:00 +2 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: better) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:59 +20 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: restore important clarification (revision 1226458510).) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Manual of Style 06:52 −2 Remsense talk contribs (→Technical language: (s)?)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:51 +13 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add per Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 06:50 −2 Remsense talk contribs (→Animals, plants, and other organisms: unnecessary bracketing)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 06:49 +276 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: add context for Jimbo Wales 2003 statement.)
30 May 2024
- Undo
- diffhist Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 19:33 +20 WhatamIdoing talk contribs (→Due and undue weight: Not a minority of editors) Tags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section 09:02 −552 Remsense talk contribs (→First sentence: ce, adherent to other parts of the MoS)
29 May 2024
- Undo
- diffhist m Wikipedia:Verifiability 20:50 −21 Dave souza talk contribs (Reverted edit by Dustfreeworld (talk) to last version by Cambalachero) Tags: Rollback Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 20:34 +21 Dustfreeworld talk contribs (Copied three words from the section below.) Tag: Reverted
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 15:11 −5 Wik6516 talk contribs (Minor rewording) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images 12:55 +23 Fuzheado talk contribs (add section for ethnic groups)
27 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Verifiability 17:46 −15 Cambalachero talk contribs (→Exceptional claims require exceptional sources: Despite the superficial similarities, Wikipedia's Verifiability and actual science are two different fields with their own rules.)
25 May 2024
- diffhist Wikipedia:Manual of Style 16:01 0 Schierbecker talk contribs (→Retaining existing styles: -ly adjective do not need hyphens)
- WP:Nfrom "reviewing > criteria" section and retain in nomination instructions; per recent discussions and prior linked discussions ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations/Archive_31#GAs_and_AfDs & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations/Archive_31#Notability_is_not_part_of_a_GA_review ) no consensus for wp:n as a criteria)