Talk:"Slut!"

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good article"Slut!" has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star"Slut!" is part of the 1989 (Taylor's Version) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 5, 2024Good article nomineeListed
April 22, 2024Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Alleged single status

Is it really one as per

WP: SINGLESCRIT? ℛonherry 20:10, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Yes. Under "Factors that suggest a song is a single", The song was serviced to radio stations with an official add date and "Factors that don't affect the legitimacy of a single", The song was only released in one territory/to one radio format. — Status (talk · contribs) 01:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I examined the article (using Google Translate of course) and it does say that "Slut!" was available on radio (anche 5 nuove canzoni, contenute in “1989 (Taylor’s Version)”: “Slut!” da oggi in radio, “Say Don’t Go (Taylor’s Version) (From the Vault)”, “Now That We Don’t Talk (Taylor’s Version) (From the Vault)”, “Suburban Legends (Taylor’s Version) (From the Vault)” e “Is It Over Now? (Taylor’s Version) (From the Vault)”.) So yes, it is a single, just that not a US single.
Ippantekina (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Yep. ℛonherry 09:44, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 December 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Kiwiz1338 (talk) 06:38, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Ippantekina (talk) 04:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Comment If that's the case, then should the song's title be written ""Like this"" (standard formatting quotation marks and quotation marks used in the title) in the article prose instead of "Like this" (standard formatting quotation marks only, currently used in the article prose)? QuietCicada - Talk 02:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We can do "'Slut'" (as in
Ippantekina (talk) 04:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
]
Support based on above comparison to the article "Heroes" (David Bowie song). -JJonahJackalope (talk) 01:14, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom Bluesatellite (talk) 02:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom. — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 05:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom and because quotations marks are actual punctuation marks and not stylization. Stylization would be if it was titled "SluT!" or "5lut!" or something like that. 94.191.152.112 (talk) 15:03, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.