Talk:École secondaire Étienne-Brûlé
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Etienne brule logo.gif
Please go to
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Request to lock this page
I am a former student of this school, and I think it is disgusting what the current students have done to this page. Being a school, there are the students and faculty who would wish to add constructive content to this page, and there are the students who just want to have a laugh and vandalise the page. As such, I suggest locking this page so that one must have an account to edit it (the same sort of restrictions imposed on pages with sensitive content, but to a lesser extent).
This article used to be over a page long and contained legitimate information about the school and its extra-curricular work, but this information has since been progressively replaced by immature comments. Bosticko (talk) 03:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
- I second this suggestion. Only a couple of years ago, this page was of considerable length and of respectable quality; however, today, I surprising found little more than a sentence on this page. I believe this article would greatly benefit from the protection suggested by Bosticko. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silentrebel (talk • contribs) 19:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- I made an application for indefinite semi-protection of this page, but it got turned down because the vandalism isn't recent enough. Maybe the relevant information from the older versions should be moved to back onto the page. At least then, the article will be more complete. If there is more vandalism, then we can apply for protection again. --Silentrebel (talk) 21:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
For