Talk:.577/450 Martini–Henry

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force British military history task force European military history task force World War I task force

United Kingdom Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This doesn't seem to fit with the other contents of the Ammunition category. Mike Wilson 22:51, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Removed it from Ammunition cat. Mike Wilson 07:39, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would love to see some more information about the cartridge's use against dangerous game/wildlife. My great grandfather worked on a project to lay telegraph lines in Rhodesia in the early part of the 20th Century. A fellow Briton was attacked by a young lion during the night and my relative shot the creature just below the right eye socket with a .577 Martini Henry. The lion dropped the man and turned on my relative. Fortunately, the lion was speared to death by native workers before it could inflict serious injury to him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.226.104.225 (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recoil from the blackpowder cartridge I had to order espcially is something! Wondered how Gurkas in british Armay handle this weapon!?BRANCUSIMOI (talk) 23:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recoil from the blackpowder cartridge I had to order espcially is something! Wondered how Gurkas in british Armay handle this weapon!?BRANCUSIMOI (talk) 23:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Granted, I'm no "expert" but, I've always heard this round referred to as the .450/.577 Martini-Henry round. How did the numbers get reversed?Al Lowe (talk) 14:39, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second that

Can/will somebody better at this than I/me please reverse/swap the numbers. It's confusing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.38.242 (talk) 04:48, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Early British cartridge designations are often this way around, (.500/450 Nitro Express, .450/400 Nitro Express, .400/350 Nitro Express etc), that is what they called it and what all of the sources still call it, it should not be swapped around. Cavalryman (talk) 06:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Late to the party I know, but the official British designation was .45 calibre. When in British army service it was not known as 577/450. Fdsdh1 (talk) 21:16, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]