Talk:1920 Muncie Flyers season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good article1920 Muncie Flyers season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 17, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
November 26, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA Review

This review is . The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 03:05, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman 03:05, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found:

  • "the Flyers had to play the rest of the season's game versus local, Indianian teams" I'd just say local teams, sounds a bit better.
  • "No player from the 1920 Muncie Flyers were listed" no players or was listed
  • " Since there was no rules" were no
  • "This was the first match between two APFA teams." both in the lead and later on, this is stated as one of the first. This sentence can probably be removed anyway since it ended up a bit repetitive.
  • "Ursella scored kicked a 25-yard field goal, " huh? reword.
  • "Waddy Kuehl scored 7-yard " scored a
  • Use Cooney Checkaye's full name and link on first mention. It's linked at the second Gas City game when it should be in the first. Also rename all the Checkeyes to Checkaye.
  • "both Mucnie teams" Muncie
  • "Weaver of the Tigers" Full name? Double check all single-names and make sure a full name is listed in the article where possible.
    • The source doesn't say the full name, and there are no rosters for non-APFA teams. How should I go about this?
      Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 22:30, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "could not content for the" contend
  • "but no single player from the Flyers were on" was
  • Do a copyedit as well, prose is a bit on the sloppy side.

I'll put the article on hold and will pass when the issues are fixed. Wizardman 04:09, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate all the comments and thank you for the review of this article!
Michael Jester (talk · contribs) 22:30, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman 02:20, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]