Talk:1966 Liberty Bowl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Good topic candidate
Promoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

I have decided to review this article. I have a few comments before I pass or fail it.

  1. A then-record 39,101 tickets were sold for the game, but due to 36-degree temperatures at game time, only 25,012 spectators attended - There is a source at the end of the sentence that states that the attendance was 39, 101. The statement written here says the attendance was 25,012. If only 25,012 spectators attended, can a source be found for that?
  2. The game was Virginia Tech's second bowl game in team history - Does that mean this is the second time that the Liberty Bowl was held in Virginia Tech?
  3. The whole sentence The game was Virginia Tech's second bowl game in team history, and the game marked the second time that Virginia Tech had played Miami needs to be sources.
  4. In the first half, Tech held Miami to just 16 yards of total offense, and Miami set bowl game records for fewest rushing yards allowed and fewest first downs allowed. - The sentence should be two separate sentences, to look like, In the first half, Tech held Miami to just 16 yards of total offense. Miami set bowl game records for fewest rushing yards allowed and fewest first downs allowed.

Once these concerns are addressed, please leave me a comment on my talk page. Thank you!

thew 2008 18:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank you for making the changes! I am passing this article.

thew 2008 20:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 13:21, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 13:21, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Dead link 3

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 13:21, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Dead link 4

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--

talk) 13:21, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1966 Liberty Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on 1966 Liberty Bowl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]